Bee Products pp 173-178 | Cite as

Effects of Feeding, Age of the Larvae, and Queenlessness on the Production of Royal Jelly

  • Nuray Sahinler
  • Osman Kaftanoglu


The effects of feeding, the age of the larvae and queenlessness on the acceptance rates and royal jelly production were studied. The average acceptance rates were 65.0±0.82% in queenright cell builders and 87.1±1.08% in queenless cell builders. Feeding colonies with pollen substitute increased the acceptance rates significantly (P<0.01) in queenless cell builders but not in queenright cell builders (P>0.05). The age of the larvae was also important on the acceptance of the cells. The acceptance rates of 1 or 2 days old larvae were higher than that of 3 days old larvae in both queenless and queenright colonies.

In queenright cell builders the average royal jelly yields were 153.7±4.27 mg per cell when they were fed with sugar syrup and 185.3±5.68 mg when pollen substitute was given besides sucrose syrup. In the queenless cell builders the average yields were 189.3±9.11 mg in the sugar syrup fed and 225.6±14.52 mg in the pollen substitute fed colonies.

In general royal jelly yield was much higher in queenless cell builders than that of queenright. Feeding colonies with pollen substitutes in addition to sucrose syrup increased the royal jelly yield by 36% in queenright colonies and 40% in queenless colonies. The best result were obtained by grafting one day old larvae in queenless cell builders that were fed with pollen substitute and sucrose syrup.


Acceptance Rate Royal Jelly Sugar Syrup Queenright Coloni Queenless Coloni 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Laidlaw, H.H., (1979). Contemporary Queen Rearing. Dadant and Sons Hamilton, Illinois.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gül, M.A., Kaftanoglu, O. (1990) Effects of grafting techniques on the quality of queen bees (Apis mellifera L.) raised under Çukurova Region conditions. Çukurova Univ. J. of Science and Engineering 4(2): 41–53 (In Turkish).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shibi, C., Fuhai, L., Shengming, H., Puxiu, L., Study on Relationship Between the Yield of Royal Jelly and the age of grafted Larvae. Bee honey. Royal jelly. Environment. China 1993. P: 67-81.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shibi, C., Shengming, H., Fuhai, L., Puxiu, L., Studies on the Relationship Between the Bee Races and the Yield of Royal Jelly. Bee honey. Royal jelly. Environment. China. 1993. P:40-53.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ruttner, F. (1988). Biogeography and taxonomy of honey bees. Springer, Verlag, Berlin. 293 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dogaroglu, M.(1981). Türkiye’de yetiştirilen onemli ari irk ve tiplerinin Cukurova Bolgesi kosullarinda performanslarinin karsilastirilmasi. Ph.D. Thesis, C.U. Ziraat Fakultesi, Adana, Turkey. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Güler, A., Kaftanoglu, O., Bek, Y, Yeninar, H. (1996) Discrimination of some Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) races and ecotypes by using morphological characteristics. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Güler, A., Kaftanoğlu, O. (1996)The performance of Anatolian honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) races and ecotypes in migratory beekeeping. Submitted for publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nuray Sahinler
    • 1
  • Osman Kaftanoglu
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureMustafa Kemal UniversityHatayTurkey
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureCukurova UniversityAdanaTurkey

Personalised recommendations