Blowhards, Snobs, and Narcissists

Interpersonal Reactions to Excessive Egotism
  • Mark R. Leary
  • Richard Bednarski
  • Dudley Hammon
  • Timothy Duncan
Part of the The Springer Series in Social/Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)


Few interactions are as annoying, exasperating, and unpleasant as those with people whom we perceive are behaving egotistically. The words commonly used to describe egotistical individuals are extremely disparaging; we call them arrogant, haughty, big-headed, vain, conceited, stuck-up, or pretentious, and brand them blowhards, show-offs, snobs, narcissists, pompous asses, or worse. Of the 300 adjectives on the Adjective Check List, those that connote egotism—arrogant, boastful, conceited, egotistical, snobbish, and the like—rank among those rated most unfavorably (Gough & Heilbrun, 1983). Simply put, we don’t like egotistical people. Our interest in this chapter is on the interpersonal aspects of egotism—why egotistical behavior evokes such strong negative reactions in other people, the consequences of egotism for both the egotistic individual and others who are present, and why, given the negative reactions of others, people often act egotistically.


Causal Attribution Borderline Personality Disorder Positive Illusion Journal ofPersonality Narcissistic Personality Inventory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (1989). The gloried self: The aggrandizement and constriction of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 52, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alicke, M. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1621–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Anderson, N. H. (1968). Likableness ratings of 555 personality-trait words, journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 272–279.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F., & Jones, E. E. (1978). When self-presentation is constrained by the target’s knowledge: Consistency and compensation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 608–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., Smart, L., & Boden, J. M. (1996). Relation of threatened egotism to violence and aggression: The dark side of high self-esteem. Psychological Review, 103, 5–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bednarski, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995, November). Narcissistic reactions to interpersonal evaluations. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society of Southeastern Social Psychologists, Del Ray Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  8. Bednarski, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1996, March). The paradox of narcissism: When high self-esteem fails. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.Google Scholar
  9. Bennett, J. B. (1988). Power and influence as distinct personality traits: Development and validation of a psychometric measure. Journal of Research in Personality, 22, 361–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blaine, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Self-esteem and self-serving biases in reactions to positive and negative events. In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard (pp. 55–85). New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bradbury, T. N., & Fincham, F. D. (1990). Attributions and behavior in marital interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bradley, G. W. (1978). Self-serving biases in the attribution process: A reexamination of the fact or fiction question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4, 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carroll, L., Corning, A. F., Morgan, R. R., & Stevens, D. M. (1991). Perceived acceptance, psychological functioning, and sex role orientation of narcissistic persons. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 943–954.Google Scholar
  15. Carroll, L., Hoenigmann-Stovall, N., King, A., Wienhold, J., & Whitehead, G. I. (in press). Interpersonal consequences of narcissistic and borderline personality disorders: A comparative investigation. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology.Google Scholar
  16. Colvin, C. R., & Block, J. (1994). Do positive illusions foster mental health? An examination of the Taylor and Brown formulation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 3–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Emmons, R. A. (1984). Factor analysis and construct validity of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 291–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farh, J., Dobbins, G. H., & Cheng, B. (1991). Cultural relativity in action: A comparison of self-ratings made by Chinese and U.S. Workers. Personnel Psychology, 44, 129–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Felson, R. B. (1993). The (somewhat) social self: How others affect self-appraisals. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 4; pp. 1–26). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Forsyth, D. R. (1986). An attributional analysis of students’ reactions to success and failure. In R. Feldman (Ed.), The social psychology of education (pp. 17–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Forsyth, D. R., Berger, R., & Mitchell, T. (1981). The effects of self-serving vs. other-serving claims of responsibility on attraction in groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Forsyth, D. R., & Schlenker, B. R. (1977). Attributing the causes of group performance: Effects of performance quality, task importance, and future testing. Journal of Personality, 45, 220–236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  24. Gough, H. G., & Heilbrun, Jr., A. B. (1983). The adjective check list manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  25. Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history. American Psychologist, 35, 603–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harder, D. W. (1984). Character style of the defensively high self-esteem man. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 26–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hartouni, Z. S. (1992). Effects of narcissistic personality organization on causal attributions. Psychological Reports, 71, 1339–1346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Jankowski, M. S. (1991). Islands in the street: Gangs and American urban society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. In J. Suls (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on the self (Vol. 1, pp. 231–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Kohut, H. (1971). The analysis of the self. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of the self. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  32. Ladd, E. R., & Welsh, M. C. (1996, March). Narcissism and causal attribution. Paper presented at the meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, Norfolk, VA.Google Scholar
  33. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  34. Leary, M. R., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Interpersonal functions of the self-esteem motive: The self-esteem system as a sociometer. In M. H. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 123–144). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  35. Leary, M. R., & Forsyth, D. R. (1987). Attributions of responsibility for collective endeavors. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Group processes (pp. 167–188). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Leary, M. R., Rogers, P. A., Canfield, R. W., & Coe, C. (1986). Boredom in interpersonal encounters: Antecedents and social implications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 968–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raskin, R., & Novacek, J. (1989). An MMPI description of the narcissistic personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53, 66–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Raskin, R., & Novacek, J. (1991). Narcissism and the use of fantasy. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 47, 490–499.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. (1991a). Narcissism, self-esteem, and defensive self-enhancement. Journal of Personality, 59, 19–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raskin, R., Novacek, J., & Hogan, R. (1991b). Narcissistic self-esteem management. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 911–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raskin, R., & Shaw, R. (1988). Narcissism and the use of personal pronouns. Journal of Personality, 56, 393–404.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rhodewalt, F., & Morf, C. C. (1995). Self and interpersonal correlates of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory: A review and new findings. Journal of Research in Personality, 29, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Roberts, J. E., & McCready, V. (1987). Different clinical perspectives of good and poor therapy sessions. Journal of Speech and Hearing research, 30, 335–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schlenker, B. R. (1975). Self-presentation: Managing the impression of consistency when reality interferes with self-enhancement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1030–1037.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
  47. Schlenker, B. R., & Leary, M. R. (1982). Audiences’ reactions to self-enhancing, self-denigrating, and accurate self-presentations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schlenker, B. R., & Miller, R. S. (1977). Egocentrism in groups: Self-serving biases or logical information processing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schlenker, B. R., Miller, R. S., Leary, M. R., & McCown, N. E. (1979). Group performance and interpersonal evaluation as determinants of egotistical attributions in groups. Journal of Personality, 47, 575–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of selrf-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 549–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smith, B. M. (1990). The measurement of narcissism in Asian, Caucasian, and Hispanic American Women. Psychological Reports, 67, 779–785.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sullivan, H. S. (1953). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: Asocial psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 193–210.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1994). Positive illusions and well-being revisited: Separating fact from fiction. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 21–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tesser, A. (1988). Toward a self-evaluation maintenance model of social behavior. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, 21, 181–227.Google Scholar
  56. Trivers, R. (1976). Foreward. In R. Dawkins, The selfish gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Watson, P. J., & Morris, R. J. (1991). Narcissism, empathy, and social desirability. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 575–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Whitley, B. E., & Frieze, I. H. (1985). Children’s causal attributions for success and failure in achievement settings: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark R. Leary
    • 1
  • Richard Bednarski
    • 1
  • Dudley Hammon
    • 1
  • Timothy Duncan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyWake Forest UniversityWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations