How Shall we Power Tomorrow’s Automobile?

  • Charles A. Amann


The thrust toward further gains in the fuel-utilization efficiency of the passenger-car engine, without sacrificing its many other desirable attributes, is continuing. The search for an attractive alternative powerplant has always been included in such efforts, but so far none has emerged. Prominent on the list of contenders today are the Stirling engine, the gas turbine, and the advanced diesel, including uncooled versions incorporating structural ceramics. Large-scale production of none of these is projected for passenger cars in the foreseeable future. Meanwhile, improvements continue to be made to indicated thermal efficiency, mechanical efficiency, and volumetric efficiency of the spark-ignition engine. Supercharging and variable engine geometry are additional options, and the advent of electronic controls has proven beneficial. The spark-ignition engine promises the ability to operate on the leading alternative fuels. Given the evolving scenario, that engine is expected to remain dominant in passenger cars to the end of this century.


Compression Ratio Fuel Economy Intake Valve Brake Thermal Efficiency Turbine Inlet Temperature 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    G. B. Warren and J. W. Bjerklie, “Proposed Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine with Constant Pressure Combustion.” SAE Paper 690045 (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Onishi, S. H. Jo, K. Shoda, P. D. Jo and S. Kato, “Active Thermo-Atmospheric Combustion (ATAC) -A New Combustion Process for Internal Combustion Engines.” SAE Transactions 88, 1851–1860 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Noguchi, Y. Tanaka, T. Tanaka and Y. Takeuchi, “A Study on Gasoline Engine Combustion by Observation of Intermediate Reactive Products During Combustion.” SAE Transactions 88, 2816–2828 (1979).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. M. Najt and D. E. Foster, “Compression-Ignited Homogeneous Charge Combustion.” SAE Transactions 92, 1.964–1. 979 (1983).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. A. Amann, “Why Not a New Engine?” SAE Transactions 89, 4561–4593 (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. M. Heavenrich, J. D. Murrell and J. P. Chang, “Light Duty Automotive Trends Through 1986.” SAE Paper 860366 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C. A. Amann, “The Powertrain, Fuel Economy and the Environment.” International Journal of Vehicle Design 7, 1–34 (1986).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Luchter and R. A. Renner, “An Assessment of the Technology of Rankine Engines for Automobiles.” U.S. Energy Research and Development Report ERDA-77–54 (1977).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    W. H. Haverdink, F. E. Heffner and C. A. Amann, “Assessment of an Experimental Stirling-Engine-Powered Automobile.” Proceedings of the 22nd Automotive Technology Development Contractors’ Meeting, 151–166 (1985).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. S. Collman, C. A. Amann, C. C. Matthews, R. J. Stettler and F. J. Verkamp, “The GT-225–An Engine for Passenger-Car Gas Turbine Research.” SAE Transactions 84, 690–712 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. L. Plee, T. Ahmad and J. P. Myers, “Flame Temperature Correlation for the Effects of Exhaust Gas Recirculation on Diesel Particulate and NOx Emissions.” SAE Transactions 90, 3738–3770 (1981).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. A. Burley and T. L. Rosebrock, “Automotive Diesel Engines–Fuel Composition Versus Particulates.” SAE Transactions 88, 3112–3123 (1979).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J. C. Wall and S. K. Hoekman, “Fuel Composition Effects on Heavy-Duty Particulate Emissions.” SAE Transactions 93, 5.1030–5. 1071 (1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R. Kamo and W. Bryzik, “Adiabatic Turbocompound Engine Prediction.” SAE Transactions 87, 213–223 (1978).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. M. Bailey, “Comparative Evaluation of Three Alternative Power Cycles for Waste Heat Recovery from the Exhaust of Adiabatic Diesel Engines.” NASA TM-86953 (1985).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    D. C. Siegla and C. A. Amann, “Exploratory Study of the Low-HeatRejection Diesel for Passenger-Car Application.” SAE Transactions 93, 259–283 (1984).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. F. Caris and E. E. Nelson, “A New Look at High Compression Engines.” SAE Transactions 67, 112–124 (1959).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. N. Mattavi, E. G. Groff, J. H. Lienesch, F. A. Matekunas and R. N. Noyes, “Engine Improvements Through Combustion Modeling.” Combustion Modeling in Reciprocating Engines, 537–579 (Eds. J. N. Mattavi and C. A. Amann ), Plenum Press, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    I. Matsumoto and A. Ohato, “Variable Induction Systems to Improve Volumetric Efficiency at Low and/or Medium Engine Speeds.” SAE Paper 860100 (1986).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    D. C. Siegla and R. M. Siewert, “The Variable Stroke Engine -Problems and Promises.” SAE Transactions 87, 2726–2736 (1978).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    W. A. Wallace and F. B. Lux, “A Variable Compression Ratio Engine Development.” SAE Transactions 72, 680–694 (1964).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    W. B. Paul and I. B. Humphreys, “Humphreys Constant Compression Engine.” SAE Transactions 6, 259–286 (1952).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    H. Getting and P. Walzer, “Alternative Approaches to Lean Burn Concepts.” (in German) Proceedings of the Symposium on Lean Burn Engines, 255–272, VDI Berichte 578 (1985).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    A. Titolo, “The Fiat System for Load Control by Variable Valve Timing.” FISITA Conference on the Automotive Spark-Ignition Engine in a New European Context, Aachen (1985).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. J. Herrin and D. J. Pozniak, “A Lost-Motion, Variable-Valve-Timing System for Automotive Piston Engines.” SAE Transactions 93, 2.7172. 729 (1984).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. L. Stivender, “Intake Valve Throttling–A Sonic Throttling Intake Valve.” SAE Transactions 77, 1293–1303 (1968).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. H. Tuttle, “Controlling Engine Load by Means of Late Intake-Valve Closing.” SAE Transactions 89, 2429–2441 (1980).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J. H. Tuttle, “Controlling Engine Load by Means of Early Intake-Valve Closing.” SAE Transactions 91, 1648–1662 (1982).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. L. Dimick, S. L. Genslak, R. E. Greib and M. J. Malik, “Emissions and Economy Potential of Prechamber Stratified Charge Engines.” SAE Transactions 88, 1653–1667 (1979).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    M.-F. Chang, M. P. Nolan, J. H. Rillings and A. A. Quader, “The Axially Stratified-Charge Engine: Control, Calibration, and Vehicle Implementation.” SAE Paper 851674 (1985).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Matsushita, T. Inoue, K. Nakanishi and N. Kobayashi, “Development of the Toyota Lean Combustion System.” SAE Paper 850044 (1985).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    A. J. Scussel, A. O. Simko and W. R. Wade, “The Ford PROCO Engine Update.” SAE Transactions 87, 2706–2725 (1978).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    W. T. Tierney, E. Mitchell and M. Alperstein, “The Texaco Controlled-Combustion System - A Stratified Charge Engine Concept - Review and Current Status.” I. Mech. E. Paper C1/75, Conference on Power Plants and Future Fuels (1975).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    R. R. Toepel, J. E. Bennethum and R. E. Heruth, “Development of Detroit Diesel Allison 6V–92TA Methanol-Fueled Coach Engine.” SAE Transactions 92, 4.959–4. 975 (1983).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    M. K. Martin, “Wankel Rotary Engine Development Status and Research Needs.” Aerospace Report No. ATR-82(2869)-5ND (1982).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    R. R. Stephenson, “Should We Have a New Engine?” Jet Propulsion Laboratory JPL SP 43–17 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles A. Amann
    • 1
  1. 1.Engine Research DepartmentGeneral Motors Research LaboratoriesWarrenUSA

Personalised recommendations