Electric Response Audiometry in Young Children

  • Hallowell Davis
Part of the Advances in the Study of Communication and Affect book series (ASCA, volume 10)

Abstract

Electric response audiometry refers to the assessment of the auditory system by means of small evoked potentials that are generated in many parts of the auditory system, from cochlea to cerebral cortex. They are separated from the background electrical activity of brain and muscle by summing, or averaging, a large number of responses. The responses are time-locked to the stimuli, and their sum increases in proportion to their number while the nearly random background largely cancels itself out. This greatly improves the signal-to-noise ratio. The technique is now quite familiar, and excellent equipment for it is commercially available.

Keywords

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Auditory System Auditory Brainstem Response Tone Burst Newborn Hearing Screening 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aran, J. M. L’électrocochléogramme: Méthodes et premiers résultats chez l’enfant. Revue de Laryngologie Otologie Rhinologie (Bordeaux), 1969, 90, 615–634.Google Scholar
  2. Davis, H. The second filter is real, but how does it work? American Journal of Otolaryngology, 1981, 2, 153–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, H., & Hirsh, S. K. A slow brainstem response for low-frequency audiometry. Audiology, 1979, 18, 445–461.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Galambos, R. Use of the auditory brainstem response (ABR) in infant hearing testing. In S. E. Gerber & G. T. Mencher (Eds.), Early diagnosis of hearing loss. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. Marshall, R. E., Reicher, T. J., Kerley, S. J., & Davis, H. Auditory function in newborn intensive care unit patients revealed by auditory brainstem potentials. Journal of Pediatrics, 1980, 96, 731–735.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mencher, G. T., & Gerber, S. E. (Eds.). Early management of hearing loss. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Roberts, J. L., Davis, H., Phon, G. L., Reichert, T. J., Sturtevant, E., & Marshall, R. E. Auditory brainstem responses in pre-term neonates: Maturation and follow-up. Journal of Pediatrics, 1982, 101, 257–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schulman-Galambos, C., & Galambos, R. Brainstem evoked response audiometry in newborn hearing screening. Archives of Otolaryngology, 1979, 105, 86–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Simmons, F. G. Patterns of deafness in newborns. The Larynogoscope, 1980, 90, 448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Starr, A., Amlie, R., Martin, W. H., & Sanders, S., Development of auditory function in newborn infants revealed by auditory brainstem potential. Pediatrics, 1977, 60, 831–839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Wiesel, T. M., & Hubel, D. H. Extent of recovery from the effects of visual deprivation in kittens. Journal of Neurophysiology, 1965, 28, 1060–1072.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yoshie, N. Auditory nerve action potential responses to clicks in man. The Laryngoscope, 1968, 78, 198–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hallowell Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Central Institute for the DeafSt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations