Final State Interaction and Field Polarization Effects in the Multiphoton Ionization of Atoms

  • F. Trombetta
  • S. Basile
  • G. Ferrante
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSB, volume 212)

Abstract

This paper deals with the role of the final state interactions in the multiphoton ionization of atoms by strong radiation fields. Considerable work has been devoted to this topic, and several aspects of it have been evidenced to various degrees along the years. The early papers neglected at all the interaction between the ejected electron and the residual ion1, and no systematic calculation was performed at orders higher than the lowest one; nevertheless, these early approaches qualitatively predicted most of the above-threshold-ionization phenomenology and only now it is becoming clear their actual potential and limits2, 3. Other approaches have tried to deal with the final state interactions suggesting that the experimental findings could be explained by means of electron scattering by the parent ion after the ionization4 or by ponderomotive scattering of the ejected electrons when leaving the laser beam5. This latter approach describes the ejected electron by a Volkov wave and let the electrons experience the time and space inhomogeneities of the laser beam, causing significant modifications of their energy and angular distributions. The experimental results appear qualitatively well reproduced by treatments relying on these mechanisms, which thus should be seriously considered for inclusion in a comprehensive, rigorous theory.

Keywords

Strong Field Atomic Spectrum Multiphoton Ionization Final State Interaction Weak Field Limit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.(a)
    L.V. Keldysh, Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1307 (1964).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. (b).
    F.H.M. Faisal, J. Phys. B 6, L89 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. H.R. Reiss, Phys. Rev. A 22, 1786 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. V. Becker, R.R. Schlicher and M.O. Scully, J. Phys. B 19, L785 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 2.
    H.R. Reiss, J. Phys. B 20, L79 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. P.H. Bucksbaum, M. Bashkansky and D.W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. A 37, 3615 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. M.D. Perry, A. Szoke, O.L. Landen and E.M. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 1270 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 3.
    M. Bashkansky, P.H. Bucksbaum and D.W. Schumacher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2458 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. S. Basile, F. Trombetta and G. Ferrante, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2435 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 4.
    L.A. Lompré, G. Mainfray, C. Manus and J. Kupersztych, J. Phys. B 20, 1009 (1987). See alsoADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. P. Agostini and G. Petite, Contemp. Phys. 29, 57 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 5.
    P.H. Bucksbaum, R.R. Freeman, M. Bashkansky and T.J. Mcllrath, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 760 (1987). See alsoADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. M. Crance, J. Phys. B 21, 1987 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 6.
    M.D. Perry, O.L. Landen, A. Szoke, E.M. Campbell, Phys. Rev. A 37, 747 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 7.(a)
    F. Trombetta, S. Basile and G. Ferrante, “Nonperturbative Treatments of Nonresonant Multiphoton Ionization of the Hydrogen Atom. The Weak Field Limit”, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B (in press).Google Scholar
  16. (b).
    S. Basile, F. Trombetta, G. Ferrante, R. Burlon and C. Leone, Phys. Rev. A 37, 1050 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 8.
    M. Jain and N. Tzoar, Phys. Rev. A 18, 538 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. P. Cavalière, G. Ferrante and C. Leone, J. Phys. B 13, 4495 (1980).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Kaiman, Phys. Rev. A 38, 5458 (1988). A similar wavefunction has been used inADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. L. Rosenberg, Phys. Rev. A 34, 4567 (1986).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Potvliege and R. Shakeshaft, Phys. Rev. A 38, 4597 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. J.Z. Kaminski, Phys. Rev. A 37, 622 (1988).ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. J.Z. Kaminski, J. Phys. C 21, 3983 (1988).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 9.
    S. Basile, F. Trombetta and G. Ferrante, J. Phys. B 21, L377 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. F. Trombetta, S. Basile and G. Ferrante, J. Phys. B 21, L539 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 10.
    See, for instance, S.M. Susskind and R.V. Jensen, Phys. Rev. A 38, 711 (1988) and references therein.ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 11.
    M. Lewenstein, J. Mostowski and M. Trippenbach, J. Phys. B 18, L461 (1985).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. M. Trippenbach, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 1429 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 12.
    W.E. Lamb, Jr, R.R. Schlicher and M.I. Scully, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2763 (1987). For a discussion about gauge-dependent intepretations in multiphoton ionization of atoms, see.ADSCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. R. Burlon, C. Leone, F. Trombetta and G. Ferrante, Il Nuovo Cimento D9, 1033 (1987) andADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. R. Shakeshaft, Z. Phys. D8, 47 (1988).ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 13.
    L. Pan, B. Sundaram and L. Armstrong, Jr., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 4, 754 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. B. Sundaram and L. Armstrong Jr, Phys. Rev. A 38, 152 (1988). For an older contribution along the same line of thought, seeADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. V.A. Kovarskii and N.F. Perel’man, Sov. Phys. JETP 34, 738 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  35. 14.
    F.H.M. Faisal, Theory of Multiphoton Processes (Plenum Press, New York, 1987), 1st edition, p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 15.
    A.I. Nikishov and V.I. Ritus, Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 168 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. A.M. Perelomov, V.S. Popov and M.V. Terent’ev, Sov. Phys. JETP 23, 924 (1966).ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. A.I. Nikishov and V.I. Ritus, Sov. Phys. JETP 25, 145 (1967).ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. A.M. Perelomov, V.S. Popov and V.P. Kuznetsov, Sov. Phys. JETP 27, 451 (1968).ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 16.
    S. Geltman, J. Phys. B 10, 831 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. J. Javanainen and J.H. Eberly, J. Phys. B 21, L93 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. L.A. Collins and A.L. Merts, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2415 (1988).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 17.(a)
    H.S. Antunes Neto and L. Davidovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2238 (1984).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. (b).
    P.W. Milonni, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2682 (1988).MathSciNetADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 18.
    K.C. Kulander, Phys. Rev. A 36, 2726 (1987).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Trombetta
    • 1
  • S. Basile
    • 2
  • G. Ferrante
    • 2
  1. 1.Istituto di Fisica dell’UniversitàPalermoItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Fisica Teorica dell’UniversitáSant’Agata di Messina, MessinaItaly

Personalised recommendations