Gasification Studies of Graphite Surface by Scanning Tunneling Microscopy

  • Deepak Tandon
  • Edwin J. Hippo


Carbon-gas reactions have been an important area of study over the past two decades. The basic mechanisms of carbon gasification are essential to understanding coal gasification. However, the studies of the inhibition and catalysis of carbon gasification have raised technical issues which have not been fully addressable until now. Some of these issues for catalytic gasification include: the effective particle size of the catalysts; the exact nature of bi-metallic catalysts; the interaction between carbon surfaces, gas, and catalyst; the percentage of the catalyst which is active; and catalyst deactivation mechanisms. The scanning tunneling microscope (STM) can address some of these issues. The purpose of this paper is to describe some preliminary work on applying STM to characterizing gasified carbon surfaces. Highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) was gasified at 650° C for a net weight loss of 5 and 30%. The study has identified the tendency to develop high oxidation rate perpendicular to the basal plane despite the unfavorable thermodynamics of attack in this direction. The initial attack does not develop in the expected hexagonal pattern which develops after 5% burnoff. Oxygen on the surface can be identified by study of bond lengths in cross sectional analysis. Additional work is required to identify the exact nature of the oxygen structures, but the techniques developed in this study demonstrate that it is possible to follow gasification with the STM.


Basal Plane Scanning Tunneling Microscope Coal Gasification Scanning Tunneling Microscope Image Graphite Surface 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Meijer, “Kinetics and Mechanism of the Alkali-Catalyzed Gasification of Carbon,” Ph.D., Thesis, University of Amsterdam (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E.J. Hippo and N. Murdie, The role of active sites in the inhibition of gas-carbon reactions, Carbon, 27, 6, 689–695 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    N. C. Nahas, Exxon catalytic coal gasification porcess, Fuel, 62, 239–241 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. A. Mims, and J. K. Pabst, Role of surface salt complexes in alkali-catalyzed carbon gasification, Fuel, 62, 176–179, (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P.L. Walker Jr., F. Rusinko, and L.G. Austin, The kinetics of the stereospecific polymerization of cc-olefins, Advances in Catalysis, 11, 2–65, 1959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Linares-Solano, E.J. Hippo, and P.L. Walker, Jr., Catalytic activity of calcium for lignite char gasification in various atmospheres, Fuel, 65, (6), 776–779 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.J. Hippo, R.J. Jenkins, and P.L. Walker, Jr., The enhancement of lignite char reactivity to steam by cation addition, Fuel 57, (5), 338–344 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Hippo and P.L. Walker, Jr., Reactivity of American coal chars in carbon dioxide at 900° C Fuel 54, 245–248 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Binnig and H. Rohrer, Scanning tunneling microscopy, Hely. Phys. Acta., 55, 726–735 (1982)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. C. W. Davies, “Quantum Mechanics,” Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, U.K. (1984)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.K. Hansma and J. Tersoff, Scanning tunneling microscopy, J. Appl. Phys. 61(2), RI-R3 (1987).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    C.J. Chen, Theory of scanning tunneling spectroscopy, J. Vac. Sci. Technol.. vol. A 6(2), 319–322.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Batra, N. Garcia, H. Rohrer, H. Salemink, E. Stoll, and S. Ciraci, A study of graphite surface with STM and electronic structure calculations, Surface Science, 181, 26–138 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. Gauthier, et al. A study of graphite and intercalated graphite by STM, J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 6 (2), 360–362 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.M. Tromp, R.J. Hamers, and J.E. Demuth, Atomic and electronic contributions to Si(111)-(7X7) STM images, Phys. Rev. B15, 34: 2, 1388–1391 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P. N. First,.1.A. Stroscio, R. A. Dragoset, D. T. Pierce, and R. J. Celotta, Metallicity and gap states in tunneling to Fe clusters on FaAs(1 10), Phys. Rev. Lett., 63: 13. 1416–1419 (1989).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Schneir, H. H. Harary, J. A. Dagata, P. K. Hansma, and R. Sonnefeld, Scanning tunneling microscopy and fabrication of nanometer scale structures at the liquid-gold interface, Scanning Microscopy, 3: 3, 719–724 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E.B. Sebok, E.J. Hippo, N. Murdie, J.F. Byrne, and J. Rehak, Scanning tunneling microscopy of various carbon materials, Materials Technology Center 7th Annual Conference, 111–117, SIUC, April 10–11 (1991).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Digital Instruments, Nanoscope II Instruction Manual, Version 5, 6780 Cortona Dr., Santa Barbara, California, 93–117.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M.R. Soto. The Effect of a vacancy on the STM image of graphite, J. Microscopy, 152:3, 779–788 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    G. Binnig, et al. Energy dependent state density corrugation of a graphite surface as seen by STM, EuroPhys. Lett. 1(1), 31–36 (1986).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. Cricient, A graphite study with a new air-operating STM, J. Microscopy, 152: 3, 789–794 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    V. Elings and F. Wudl, Tunneling microscopy of various carbon materials, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6 (2), 412–414 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. Porte, D. Richard and P. Gallezor, STM of oxidized graphite, J. Microscopy, 152: 2, 515–552 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    D.P.E. Smith, H. Horber and C. Gerber, Smeetic liquid crystal monolayers on graphite observed by STM, Science, 245, 43–45 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.S. Hubacek, R.T. Brockenbrough, G. Gommie, S.L. Skala, J.W. Lyping, J.L. Latten and J.R. Shapley, STM of graphite adsorbed molecular species, J. Microscopy, 152: 1, 221–227 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    P.K. Hansma, V.B. Elings and O. Marti, Scanning tunneling microscopy and atomic force microscopy: pplication to biology and technology, Science, 242, 209–216 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Batra and S. Ciraci. Theoretical STM and AFM study of graphite including tip-surface interaction, J. Vac. Sci. Techol. A 6 (2), 313–318 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    L.L. Soethout,J.W. Gerristen, P.P. McGroeneveld, B.J. Nelissen and H. van Kempen, STM measurements on graphite using correlation averaging of the data, J. Microscopy, 152: 1, 251–258 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    R.D. Colton, S.M. Baker, R.J. Driscoll, M.G. Youngquist, and J.D. Baldeschwieler, Imaging graphite in air by STM: role of the tip, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 6 (2), 349–353 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S.P. Kelty, C.M. Lieber, STM investigations of the electronic structure of potassium-graphite intercalation compounds, J. Phys. Chem. 93: 5983–5985 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deepak Tandon
    • 1
  • Edwin J. Hippo
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical Engineering and Energy ProcessesSouthern Illinois University at CarbondaleCarbondaleUSA

Personalised recommendations