Scale-Area Analysis of Scanning Tunneling Microscopy/Atomic Force Microscopy Data by the Patchwork Method

  • Christopher A. Brown
  • E. Michael Shipulski

Abstract

A new method of analyzing large, topographic data sets, such as those generated by scanning probe microscopy (e.g., STM, AFM) is described. The method uses triangular patches to calculate areas of the topographic data set as a function of patch areas, i.e., as a function of scale. This patchwork method is analogous to the coastline method of fractal analysis for profiles, however, because the calculations are based on areas rather than profiles or coastlines, the patchwork method makes use of the information inherent in the proximity of the individual scans. This method develops characterizations for the data sets that have clear applications in engineering design and research. It has the potential for elucidating mechanisms of interactions with surfaces, analyzing surface creation and wear mechanisms, and for designing surface topographies and the manufacturing processes to produce them.

Using the patchwork method, one can identify the smooth-rough crossover in scale which separates the relatively large scales where the surface is smooth and best described by Euclidean geometry, from those smaller scales where the surface is rough and best described by fractal geometry. One also obtains parameters that characterize the intricacies, or complexities, of the topography below the smooth-rough crossover, and the scales over which different levels of geometric complexity exist. These complexity parameters can be related to fractal dimensions; more than one fractal dimension for a topographic data set indicates that the geometry has a multifractal character.

The surface areas, calculated as a function of scale from the topographic data sets, can also be used directly to determine the strengths of interactions with the surface. To determine the strength of interaction (e.g., adhesion) the interaction is modeled as a collection of discrete interactions (e.g., adhesive bonds) of determinable size and strength. The strength of the interaction is then determined from the surface area calculated at the size, or scale, of the interaction.

Keywords

Fractal Dimension Fractal Geometry Diamond Coating Triangle Area Dependent Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    L. Mummery, “Surface Texture Analysis The Handbook,” Hommelwerke, Schnurr Druck, West Germany 23–59 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Cailler, A. Lahmar, G.H. Lee, Adhesion studies of magnetron-sputtered copper films on chemically etched nickel substrates: effects of the concentration and the temperature of the bath, Thin Solid Films, 182: 167–184 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    B.B. Mandelbrot, Les Objects Fractal, l’Imprimerie Chirat, Saint-Just-la-Pendue (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.B. Mandelbrot, “Fractals Form, Chance, and Dimension,” W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco (1977).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    B.B. Mandelbrot, D.E. Passoja, A.J. Paullay, Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals, Nature 308: 721–722 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.J. Gagnepain, C. Roques-Carmes, Fractal approach to two-dimensional and three-dimensional surface roughness, Wear, 109: 119–126 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.E. Underwood, K. Banerji, Fractals in fractography, Mater. Sci. Eng. 80: 1–14 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Tricot, J.F. Quiniou, D. Wehbi, C. Roques-Carmes, B. Dubuc, Evaluation de la fractale d’un graphe, Review Phys. App. 23: 111–124 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    C.A. Brown, P.D. Charles, W.A. Johnsen, S. Chesters, Fractal Analysis of topographic data by the patchwork method, Wear, 161: 61–67 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Suzuki, F.E. Kennedy, Friction and temperature at head-disk interface in contact start/stop tests, Tribology and Mechanics of Magnetic Storage Systems. V: 30–36 (1988).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T.C. Tsai, Y. Mehmandoust, H. Samani, A. Eltoukhy, Tribological phenomena at the head-disk interface of thin-film–rigid disks, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A7: 2491–2495 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    B.B. Mandelbrot, Self-affine fractals and fractal dimension, Phys. Scr. 32: 257–260 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christopher A. Brown
    • 1
  • E. Michael Shipulski
    • 1
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering Department Manufacturing Engineering ProgramWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations