Advertisement

Young Multihandicapped Sensory Impaired Children: Making Educational Decisions

  • Rebecca R. Fewell
  • Betty Carlson
Chapter

Abstract

Educational decision making is a process in which parents, educators, and other persons involved in a child’s educational program decide the most appropriate services for the child and how those services should be rendered. The process for making educational decisions for multihandicapped sensory impaired children is the same as that for other children with special needs, except for possible differences in the service options, the instructional perspectives, and to some extent, the content and emphasis of the curriculum.

Keywords

Handicapped Child Deaf Child Instructional Program Impaired Child Residential School 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adelson, E., and Fraiberg, S. Gross motor development in infants blind from birth. Child Development 1974, 45, 114–126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberto, P., and Troutman, A. Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Columbus, OH: Charles Merrill, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. Almy, M. The impact of Piaget on early childhood education. In F. B. Murray (Ed.), The impact of Piagetian theory on education, psychiatry and psychology. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  4. Bagnato, S.J., and Neisworth, J.T., Linking developmental assessment and curricula. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. Barraga, N.C. Visual handicaps and learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1976.Google Scholar
  6. Burlingham, D. Some notes on the development of the blind. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 1961, 16, 121–145.Google Scholar
  7. Cutsforth, T.D. The blind in school and society: A psychological study. New York: American Foundation for the Blind, 1951.Google Scholar
  8. Diebold, M.H., Curtis, W.S., and DuBose, R.F. Developmental scales versus measures for deaf-blind children. Exceptional Children 1978, 44, 275–278.Google Scholar
  9. Diebold, M.H., Curtis, W.S., and DuBose, R.F. Relationship between psychometric and observational measures of performance in low-functioning children. AAESPH Review 1978, 3, 123–128.Google Scholar
  10. DuBose, R., and Kelly, J. Curricula and instruction for young handicapped children: A guideline for selection and evaluation WESTAR Series Paper #9, Monmouth, OR, May 1981.Google Scholar
  11. DuBose, R.F. Working with sensorily impaired children, Part I: Visual impairments. In S.G. Garwood (Ed.), Educating young handicapped children. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems Corporation, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Elliott, L.L. Epidemiology of hearing impairment and other communicative disorders. In B.S. Schoenberg (Ed.) Advances in Neurology Vol. 19, New York: Raven Press, 1978.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrell, K. Orientation and mobility for preschool children: What we have and what we need. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness. April, 1979, 147–150.Google Scholar
  14. Folio, M.R., and Fewell, R.R. Peabody developmental motor scales and programmed activities. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources, 1982.Google Scholar
  15. Fraiberg, S. Insights from the blind. New York: Basic Books, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. Fraiberg, S., and Adelson, E. Self-representation in language and play: Observations of blind children. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly 1973, 42, 539–562.Google Scholar
  17. Goodwin, W.L., and Driscoll, L.A. Handbook for measurement and evaluation in early childhood education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers, 1980.Google Scholar
  18. Hanninen, K.A. Teaching the visually handicapped. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1975.Google Scholar
  19. Harley, R.J., Jr. Children with visual disabilities. In L. Dunn (Ed.), Exceptional children in the schools: Special education in transition. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1973.Google Scholar
  20. Hart, V. The multiply-impaired visually handicapped child in the day school. Association for the Education of the Visually Handicapped. Selected Papers 50th Biennial Conference, 1970, 45–54.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, T., Lang, R., and Wyatt, P. A model field service delivery system: The public day school component of the model vision project. Nashville, TN: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1978.Google Scholar
  22. Kapperman, G. Assessment of the visually handicapped. In D. Sabatino and T. Miller (Eds.), Describing learner characteristics of handicapped children and youth. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1979.Google Scholar
  23. Langley, M.B. The teachable moment and the handicapped infant. Reston, VA: ERIC Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children, Council for Exceptional Children, 1980.Google Scholar
  24. Langley, M.B., and DuBose, R.F. Functional vision screening for severely handicapped children. The New Outlook for the Blind 1976, 70, 346–350.Google Scholar
  25. McGinnis, A. Functional linguistic strategies of blind children. Journal of Visual Impairments and Blindness. May, 1981, 210–214.Google Scholar
  26. McGuigan, C. Analysis and use of performance data. In C.L. Hansen (Ed.), Child assessment: The process and the product. Seattle, WA: Program Development Assistance System, 1980.Google Scholar
  27. Mori, A., and Olive, J. The blind and visually handicapped mentally retarded: Suggestions for interventions in infancy. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness September, 1978, 273–279.Google Scholar
  28. National Society for the Prevention of Blindness. NSPB fact book. Estimated statistics on blindness and visual problems New York. Author, 1966.Google Scholar
  29. Norris, M., Spaulding, P., and Brodie, F. Blindness in children Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957.Google Scholar
  30. Provus, M.M. Evaluation of ongoing programs in the public school system. In R.W. Tyler (Ed.), Educational evaluation: New roles, new means 68th yearbook, Part 2. National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.Google Scholar
  31. Rapin, I. Effects of early blindness and deafness on cognition. In R. Katzman (Ed.), Congenital and acquired cognitive disorders. New York: Raven Press, 1979.Google Scholar
  32. Report on the Ad Hoc Committee to Define Deaf and Hard of Hearing to Conference of Executives of American Schools for the Deaf, June 22, 1975.Google Scholar
  33. Rogow, S. Play and reality: Essentials of educational planning for blind retarded children. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded December, 1976, 314–317.Google Scholar
  34. Rogow, S. Developing play skills and communicative competence in multiply handicapped young people. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness May 1981, 197–202.Google Scholar
  35. Stephens, B. A Piagetian approach to curriculum development for the severely, profoundly and multiply handicapped. In E. Sontag, J. Smith, and N. Certo (Eds.)., Educational Programming for the Severely and Profoundly Handicapped Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, Division on Mental Retardation, 1977.Google Scholar
  36. Stufflebeam, D.L., and others. Educational evaluation and decision making. Itasca, IL: Peacock, 1971.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, J.L. Educating the multihandicapped blind child. Association for Educators of the Visually Handicapped. Selected Papers 50th Biennial Conference, 1970, 1–10.Google Scholar
  38. Tyler, R.W. General statement on evaluation. Journal of Educational Research 1942, 35, 492–501.Google Scholar
  39. Walker, J., Tucker, J., Louro, C., and Mirro, M. Individualizing programming for the severely multiply-handicapped. Texas Regional Resource Center, Technical Report No. 1, Austin, TX, 1975.Google Scholar
  40. Warren, D. Blindness and early childhood development. New York: American Foundation for the Blind Inc., 1977.Google Scholar
  41. Waterhouse, E.J. The multiple handicapped blind child. American Association of Instructors for the Blind. Selected Papers. 47th Biennial Conference, 1964, 28–31.Google Scholar
  42. Williams, W., and Gotts, E. Selected considerations in developing curriculum for severely handicapped students. In E. Sontag, J. Smith, and N. Certo (Eds.), Educational programming for the severely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children, 1977.Google Scholar
  43. Wills, D. Early speech development in blind children. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child 1979, 34, 85–117.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Writer, J. The design of instructional programs for severely multihandicapped students. In Educational Methods for Deaf-Blind and Severely Handicapped Students. Austin, TX: Texas Education Agency, 1979.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rebecca R. Fewell
    • 1
  • Betty Carlson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options