Issues of Cultural Bias in the Assessment of Minority Handicapped Children

  • Cecil R. Reynolds

Abstract

This chapter is based on an invited address to the American Psychological Association Division of Evaluation and Measurement at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Los Angeles, August, 1981, and a subsequent article appearing in the Journal of Special Education in 1983.

Keywords

Black Child Cultural Bias Test Bias Aptitude Test Scholastic Aptitude Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anastasi, A. Psychological testing. New York: MacMillan, 1976. Bernal, E.M. A response to “Educational uses of tests with disad-vantaged students. ” American Psychologist 1975, 30, 93–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blaha, J., Wallbrown, F., and Wherry, R.J. The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. Psychological Reports 1975, 35, 771–778.Google Scholar
  3. Bossard, M.D., Reynolds, C.R., and Gutkin, T.B. A regression analysis of test bias on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1980, 9, 52–54.Google Scholar
  4. Cleary, T.A., Humphreys, L.G., Kendrick, S.A., and Wesman, A. Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist 1975, 30, 15–41.Google Scholar
  5. Dean, R.S. Reliability of the WISC-R with Mexican-American children. Journal of School Psychology 1977, 15, 267–268.Google Scholar
  6. Dean, R.S. WISC-R factor structure for Anglo and Hispanic children. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York, September, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. DeFries, J.C., Vandenberg, S.G., McClearn, G.E., Kuse, A.R., Wilson, J.R., Ashton, G.C., and Johnson, R.C. Near identity of cognitive structure in two ethnic groups. Science 1974, 183, 338–339.Google Scholar
  8. Feldt, L.S. A test of the hypothesis that Cronbach’s alpha or Kuder-Richardson coefficient twenty is the same for two tests. Psychometrika 1969, 34, 363–373.Google Scholar
  9. Gutkin, T.B., and Reynolds, C.R. Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred for psychological services. Journal of School Psychology 1980, 18, 34–39.Google Scholar
  10. Gutkin, T.B., and Reynolds, C.R. Factorial similarity of the WISC-R for white and black children from the standardization sample. Journal of Educational Psychology 1981, 73, 227–231.Google Scholar
  11. Hilliard, A.G. Standardization and cultural bias as impediments to the scientific study and validation of “intelligence.” Journal of Research and Development in Education 1979, 12, 47–58.Google Scholar
  12. Hirsch, J. To “unfrock the charlatans.” SAGE Race Relations Monographs 1981, 6, 1–67.Google Scholar
  13. Horn, J., and Goldsmith, H. Reader be cautious: A review of Bias in Mental Testing. American Journal of Education 1981, 89, 305–329.Google Scholar
  14. Hunter, J.E., Schmidt, F.L., and Hunter R. Differential validity of employment tests by race: A comprehensive review and analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1979, 86, 721–735.Google Scholar
  15. Jensen, A.R. How biased are culture-loaded tests? Genetic Psychology Monographs 1974, 90, 185–224.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, A.R. An examination of bias in the Wonderlic Personnel Test. Intelligence 1977, 1, 51–64.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, A.R. Bias in mental testing. New York: The Free Press, 1980.a.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, A.R. Correcting the bias against mental tests: A preponderance of peer agreement. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980, 3, 359–371.b.Google Scholar
  19. Kaufman, A.S. Intelligent testing with the WISC-R. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1979.Google Scholar
  20. Kaufman, A.S., and DiCuio, R. Separate factor analyses of the McCarthy Scales for groups of black and white children. Journal of School Psychology 1975, 13, 10–18.Google Scholar
  21. Kaufman, A.S., and Hollenbeck, G.P. Comparative structure of the WPPSI for blacks and whites. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1974, 30, 316–319.Google Scholar
  22. Larry P. et al. v. Riles et al. No. C 71 2270. U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of California, San Francisco, October, 1979, slip opinion.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, D.O., Balla, D.A., and Shanok, S.S. Some evidence of race bias in the diagnosis and treatment of the juvenile offender. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 1979, 49, 53–61.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, D.O., Shanok, S.S., Cohen, R.J., Kligfield, M., and Frisone, G. Race bias in the diagnosis and disposition of violent adolescents. American Journal of Psychiatry 1980, 137, 1211–1216.Google Scholar
  25. Lindsey, J. The factorial organization of intelligence as related to the variables of age, sex, and subculture. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, 1967.Google Scholar
  26. Mercer, J.R. What is a racially and culturally nondiscriminatory test? A sociological and pluralistic perspective. In C.R. Reynolds and R.T. Brown (Eds.) Perspectives on Bias in Mental Testing New York: Plenum, in press.Google Scholar
  27. Merz, W.R. A factor analysis of the Goodenough-Harris Drawing Test across four ethnic groups. (Doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico, 1970). Dissertation Abstracts International 1970 (University Microfilms #70–19, 714).Google Scholar
  28. Miele, F. Cultural bias in the WISC. Intelligence 1979, 3, 149–164.Google Scholar
  29. Mulaik, S.A. The foundations of factor analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1972.Google Scholar
  30. Oakland, T., and Feigenbaum, D. Multiple sources of test bias on the WISC-R and the Bender-Gestalt test. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979, 47, 968–974.Google Scholar
  31. O’Conner, E.J., Wexley, K.N., and Alexander, R.A. Single group validity: Fact or fallacy. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975, 60, 352–355.Google Scholar
  32. PASE: Parents in Action of special education et al. v. Hannon et al. No. 74 C 3586. U.S.D.C. for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, Chicago, July, 1980, slip opinion.Google Scholar
  33. Potthoff, R.F. Statistical aspects of the problem of bias in psychological tests. Institute of Statistics Mimeo Series No. 479, Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Department of Statistics, 1966.Google Scholar
  34. Reschly, D.J. WISC-R factor structures among Anglos, Blacks, Chicanos, and Native American Papagos. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1978, 46, 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reschly, D.J., and Reschly, J.E. Validity of WISC-R factor scores in predicting achievement and attention for four sociocultural groups. Journal of School Psychology 1979, 17, 355–361.Google Scholar
  36. Reschly, D.J., and Sabers, D. Analysis of test bias in four groups with the regression definition. Journal of Educational Measurement 1979, 16, 1–9.Google Scholar
  37. Reynolds, C.R. Differential validity of several preschool assessment instruments for blacks, whites, males, and females. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens, 1978.Google Scholar
  38. Reynolds, D.R. The invariance of the factorial validity of the Metropolitan Readiness Tests for blacks, whites, males, and females. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1979, 39, 1047–1052.Google Scholar
  39. Reynolds, C.R. In support of “Bias in Mental Testing” and scientific inquiry. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1980, 3, 352.a.Google Scholar
  40. Reynolds, C.R. Differential construct validity of a preschool battery for blacks, whites, males, and females. Journal of School Psychology 1980, 18, 112–125.b.Google Scholar
  41. Reynolds, C.R. Differential construct validity of intelligence as popularly measured: Correlations of age with raw scores on the WISC-R for blacks, whites, males, and females. Intelligence 1980, 4, 371–379.c.Google Scholar
  42. Reynolds, C.R. An examination for test bias in a preschool battery across race and sex. Journal of Educational Measurement 1980, 1/, 137–146.d.Google Scholar
  43. Reynolds, C.R. The problem of bias in psychological assessment. In C.R. Reynolds and T.B. Gutkin (Eds.), The Handbook of School Psychology New York: Wiley, 1982.a.Google Scholar
  44. Reynolds, C.R. Methods for detecting construct and predictive bias. In R.A. Berk (Ed.), Handbook of Methods for Detecting Test Bias Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982.b.Google Scholar
  45. Reynolds, C.R., and Brown, R.T. Bias in mental testing: An introduction to the issues. In C.R. Reynolds and R.T. Brown (Eds.), Perspectives on Bias in Mental Testing New York: Plenum, in press.a.Google Scholar
  46. Reynolds, C.R., and Brown, R.T. (Eds.) Perspectives on bias in mental testing. New York: Plenum, in press.b.Google Scholar
  47. Reynolds, C.R., Gutkin, T.B., Dappen, L., and Wright, D. Differential validity of the WISC-R for boys and girls referred for psychological services. Perceptual and Motor Skills 1979, 48, 868–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reynolds, C.R., and Gutkin, T.B. A regression analysis of test bias on the WISC-R for Anglos and Chicanos referred to psychological services. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1980, 8, 237–243.Google Scholar
  49. Reynolds, C.R., and Harding, R.E. Comparative outcome in two studies of factorial similarity under six methods of factor comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement in press.Google Scholar
  50. Reynolds, C.R., and Hartlage, L.C. Comparison of WISC and DISC-R regression lines for academic prediction with black and with white referred children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979, 47, 589–591.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, C.R., and Nigl, A.J. A regression analysis of differential validity of intelligence tests for black and for white inner city children. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 1981, 10, 176–178.Google Scholar
  52. Reynolds, C.R., and Paget, K.D. Factor analysis of the revised children’s manifest anxiety scale for blacks, whites, males, and females with a national normative sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1981, 49, 352–359.Google Scholar
  53. Reynolds, C.R., and Paget, K.D. National normative and reliability data for the Revised-Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale. School Psychology Review in press.Google Scholar
  54. Reynolds, C.R., and Piersel, W.C. Multiple aspects of bias on the Boehm Test of Basic Concepts (Forms A and B) for whites and Mexican-Americans. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment in press.Google Scholar
  55. Reynolds, C.R., Plake, B.S., and Harding, R.E. Group by item interactions in the assessment of children’s anxiety levels: Effects of race, sex, and age on item responses. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment in press.Google Scholar
  56. Reynolds, C.R., and Richmond, B.O. What I Think and Feel: A revised measure of children’s manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 1978, 6, 271–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reynolds, C.R., and Richmond, B.O. Factor structure and construct validity of “What I Think and Feel:” The Revised-Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment 1979, 43, 281–283.Google Scholar
  58. Sandoval, J7— The WISC-R and internal evidence of test bias with minority children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1979, 47, 919–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sandoval, J., Zimmerman, I.L., and Woo-Sam, J. Cultural differences on WISC-R verbal items. Paper presented to the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Montreal, September, 1980.Google Scholar
  60. Schoenfeld, W.N. Notes on a bit of psychological nonsense: “Race differences in intelligence.” Psychological Record 1974, 24, 17–32.Google Scholar
  61. Semler, I., and Iscoe, I. Structure of intelligence in Negro and White children. Journal of Educational Psychology 1966, 57. 326–336.Google Scholar
  62. Sewell, T.E. Intelligence and learning tasks as predictors of scholastic achievement in black and white first-grade children. Journal of School Psychology 1979, 17, 325–332.Google Scholar
  63. Silverstein, A.B. Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children for three ethnic groups. Journal of Educational Psychology 1973, 65, 408–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vance, H.B., and Wallbrown, F.H. The structure of intelligence for black children: A hierarchical approach. The Psychological Record 1978, 28, 31–39.Google Scholar
  65. Wallbrown, F.H., Blaha, J., Wallbrown, J., and Engin, A. The hierarchical factor structure of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. British Journal of Educational Psychology 1974, 44, 47–55.Google Scholar
  66. Wechsler, D. Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1974.Google Scholar
  67. Williams, R.L. From dehumanization to black intellectual genocide: A rejoinder. In G.J. Williams and Sol Gordon (Eds.), Clinical Child Psychology: Current Practices and Future Perspectives New York: Behavioral Publications, 1974.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cecil R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Texas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations