Problem Genera and Family Interfaces in the Eupyrenomycetes

  • J. D. Rogers
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 269)

Summary

Perplexities related to the systematics of Eupyrenomycetes are due to the relatively few taxa that have been studied, and the many fewer taxa that have been investigated in depth. Moreover, the apparent great age of the ascomycetes, the general scarcity of fossil records, and the supposition that early genera have not survived to the present, accentuate problems associated with developing a natural (phylogenetic) classification. Two specific problem areas of eupyrenomycete systematics discussed are: the interfaces among Eupyrenomycetes and Loculoascomycetes; and selected examples of problem interfaces among eupyrenomycete families and genera. In the latter problem area the following topics are considered: generic relationships in Xylariaceae; relationships between Xylariaceae and Diatrypaceae; relationships between Calosphaeriaceae and some other families; the status of Boliniaceae; the status of Coniochaetaceae; Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma; interfaces between Amphisphaeriaceae and Xylariaceae; problems in taxa of Diaporthales; the status of Cainiaceae; and parallel versus convergent evolution among Eupyrenomycetes.

Keywords

Convergent Evolution Conidiogenous Cell Apical Ring Germ Slit Ascogenous Hypha 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arx, J. A. von, 1979, Ascomycetes as Fungi Imperfecti, in: The Whole Fungus ([W.] B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 201–213. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, M.E., 1989, Some unitunicate taxa excluded from Didymosphaeria, Studies in Mycology, Baarn 31: 23–27.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, M.E., J.D. Rogers, and Y.-M. Ju, 1993, Revisionary studies in the Calosphaeriales, Mycotaxon 98: 529–535.Google Scholar
  4. Barr, M.E., 1990a, Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes, Mycotaxon 39: 43–184.Google Scholar
  5. Barr, M.E., 1990b, Melanommatales (Loculoascomycetes), North American Flora 2(13): 1–129.Google Scholar
  6. Barr, M.E., 1993, Redisposition of some taxa described by J.B. Ellis, Mycotaxon 46: 45–76.Google Scholar
  7. Bellemère, A., M.-C. Janex-Favre, and A. Parguey-Leduc, 1987, Marius Chadefaud et les asques: données in édites études ultrastructurales complémentaires, Bulletin de la Société Botanique du France 134 (Lettres botanique): 217-246.Google Scholar
  8. Bellemère, A., and M.A. Letrouit-Galinou, 1981, The lecanoralean ascus: an ultrastructural preliminary study, In: Ascomycete Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept (D.R. Reynolds, ed.): 54–70. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain, R.F., 1972, Evolution of the fungi, Mycologia 64:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Checa, J., J.M. Barrasa, G. Moreno, F. Fort, and J. Guarro, 1988, The genus Coniochaeta (Sacc.) Cooke (Coniochaetaceae, Ascomycotina) in Spain, Cryptogamie, Mycologie 9: 1–34.Google Scholar
  11. Constantinescu, O., and L. Tibell, 1992, Teleomorph-anamorph connections in ascomycetes 4. Arthropycnis praeternüssa gen. and sp. nov., the anamorph of Rhynchostoma minutum, Nova Hedwigia 55: 169–177.Google Scholar
  12. Davis, P.H., and V.H. Heywood, 1963, Principles of Angiosperm Taxonomy, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh & London.Google Scholar
  13. de Hoog, G.S., and R.J. Scheffer, 1984, Ceratocystis versus Ophiostoma: a reappraisal, Mycologia 76: 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dick, M.W., and D.L. Hawksworth, 1985, A synopsis of the biology of the Ascomycotina, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 91: 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doguet, G., 1959, Organogénie du périthèce du Coniochaeta ligniaria. Comparison avec l’organogénie des Xylaria et des discomycétes angiocarps, Revue de Mycologie 24: 18–38.Google Scholar
  16. Eriksson, O., 1966, On Anthostomella Sacc, Entosordaria (Sacc.) Höhn. and some related genera (Pyrenomycetes), Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 60: 315–324.Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson, O., 1981, The families of bitunicate ascomycetes, Opera Botanica 60: 8–220.Google Scholar
  18. Glawe, D.A., and J.D. Rogers, 1986, Conidial states of some species of Diatrypaceae and Xylariaceae, Canadian Journal of Botany 64: 1493–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington, T.C., 1981, Cycloheximide sensitivity as a taxonomic character in Ceratocystis, Mycologia 73: 1123–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hausner, G., J. Reid, and G.R. Klassen, 1992, Do galeate-ascospore members of the Cephaloascaceae, Endomycetaceae and Ophiostomataceae share a common phylogeny?, Mycologia 84: 870–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hawksworth, D.L., 1985, Problems and prospects in the systematics of the Ascornycotina, Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences, Plant Sciences 94: 319–339.Google Scholar
  22. Hawksworth, D.L., 1991, The fungal dimension of biodiversity: magnitude, significance, and conservation, Mycological Research 95: 641–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huhndorf, S.M., 1992, Neotropical ascomycetes 2. Hypsostroma, a new genus from the Dominican Republic and Venezuela, Mycologia 84: 750–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingold, C.T., 1954, The ascogenous hyphae in Daldinia, Transactions of the British Mycological Society 37: 108–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jensen, J.D., 1981, The developmental morphology of Hypoxylon serpens in culture, Canadian Journal of Botany 59: 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen, J.D., 1983, The development of Diaporthe phaseolorum variety sojae in culture, Mycologia 75: 1074–1091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnston, P.R., and D.W. Minter, 1989, Structure and taxonomic significance of the ascus in the Coryneliaceae, Mycological Research 92: 422–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jong, S.C., and J.D. Rogers, 1972, Conidial states of some Hypoxylon species, Washington State University, College of Agriculture Technical Bulletin 71: 1–51.Google Scholar
  29. Ju, Y.-M., and J.D. Rogers, 1990, Astrocystis reconsidered, Mycologia 82: 342–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ju, Y.-M., F. San Martin Gonzalez, and J.D. Rogers, 1993, Three xylariaceous fungi with scolecosporous conidia, Mycotaxon 47: 219–228.Google Scholar
  31. Kendrick, B., and F. DiCosmo, 1979, Teleomorph-anamorph connections in ascomycetes, In: The Whole Fungus ([W.] B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 283–359. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  32. Krug, J.C., 1977, The genus Cainia and a new family, Cainiaceae, Sydowia 30: 122–133.Google Scholar
  33. Laessoe, T., J.D. Rogers, and A.J.S. Whalley, 1989, Camillea, Jongiella, and light-spored species of Hypoxylon, Mycological Research 93: 121–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Letrouit-Galinou, M.-A., 1973, Les asques des lichens et le type archaeascé, Bryologist 76: 30–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luttrell, E.S., 1951, Taxonomy of the pyrenomycetes, University of Missouri Studies 24 (3): 1–120.Google Scholar
  36. Luttrell, E.S., 1973, Loculoascornycetes, In: The Fungi: An advanced treatise (G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow and A.S. Sussman, eds) 4A: 185–219. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  37. Luttrell, E.S., 1981, The pyrenomycete centrum — Loculoascornycetes, In: Ascomycete Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept (D.R. Reynolds, ed.): 124–137. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Luttrell, E.S., 1989, The package approach to growing peanuts, Annual Review of Phytopathology 27: 1–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mahoney, D.P., and J.S. LaFavre, 1981, Coniochaeta extramundana with a synopsis of other Coniochaeta species, Mycologia 73: 931–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malloch, D., and R.F. Cain, 1971, New cleistothecial Sordariaceae and a new family, Coniochaetaceae, Canadian Journal of Botany 49: 869–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Malloch, D., and C.T. Rogerson, 1977, Pulveria, a new genus of Xylariaceae (ascomycetes), Canadian Journal of Botany 55: 1505–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, J.H., 1961, A Monograph of the World Species of Hypoxylon, University of Georgia Press, Athens.Google Scholar
  43. Müller, E., and J. A. von Arx, 1973, Pyrenomycetes: Meliolales, Coronophorales, Sphaeriales, In: The Fungi: An advanced treatise (G.C. Ainsworth, F.K. Sparrow, and A.S. Sussman, eds) 4A: 87–132. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Müller, E., and R. Corbaz, 1956, Kulturversuche mit Ascomyceten III, Sydowia 10: 181–188.Google Scholar
  45. Munk, A., 1957, Danish pyrenomycetes, Dansk Botanisk Arkiv 17: 1–491.Google Scholar
  46. Nannfeldt, J.A., 1972, Camarops Karst. (Sphaeriales, Boliniaceae) with special regard to European species, Svensk Botanisk Tidskrifl 66: 335–376.Google Scholar
  47. Parguey-Leduc, A., and M.-C. Janex-Favre, 1981, The ascocarps of ascohymenial pyrenomycetes, In: Ascomycete Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept (D.R. Reynolds, ed.): 102–123. Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Petrini, L.E., and E. Müller, 1986, Haupt-und Nebenfruchtformen Europäischer Hypoxylon — arten (Xylariaceae, Sphaeriales) und verwandter pilze, Mycologia Helvetica 1: 501–627.Google Scholar
  49. Pirozynski, K.A., 1974, Xenotypa Petrak and Graphostroma gen. nov., segregates from Diatrypaceae, Canadian Journal of Botany 52: 2129–2135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rappaz, F., 1987, Taxonomic et nomenclature des Diatrypacées à asques octospores, Mycologia Helvetica 2: 285–648.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, D.R., 1981, Ascomycete Systematics: The Luttrellian Concept, Springer-Verlag, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reynolds, D.R., 1989, The bitunicate ascus paradigm, Botanical Review 55: 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roane, M.K., G.J. Griffin, and J.R. Elkins, 1986, Chestnut Blight, other Endothia diseases, and the genus Endothia, American Phytopathological Society Press, St Paul, Minn.Google Scholar
  54. Rodrigues, K.F., and G.J. Samuels, 1989, Studies in the genus Phylacia (Xylariaceae), Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 49: 290–297.Google Scholar
  55. Rogers, J.D., 1971, Observations on the ascogenous system of Hypoxylon microplacum, Canadian Journal of Botany 49: 1075–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rogers, J.D., 1972, Hypoxylon cohaerens: cytology of the ascus, Mycopathologia et Mycologia Applicata 48: 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rogers, J.D., 1975, Hypoxylon serpens: cytology and taxonomic considerations, Canadian Journal of Botany 53: 52–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rogers, J.D., 1979, The Xylariaceae: systematic, biological and evolutionary aspects, Mycologia 71: 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rogers, J.D., 1985, Anamorphs of Xylaria: taxonomic considerations, Sydowia 38: 255–262.Google Scholar
  60. Rogers, J.D., and G.J. Samuels, 1987, Camarops biporosa sp. nov. from French Guiana, Mycotaxon 28: 415–417.Google Scholar
  61. Rogerson, C.T., 1970, The hypocrealean fungi (ascomycetes, Hypocreales), Mycologia 62: 865–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Romero, A.I., and G.J. Samuels, 1991, Studies on xylophilous fungi from Argentina. VI. Ascornycotina on Eucalyptus viminalis (Myrtaceae), Sydowia 43: 228–248.Google Scholar
  63. Rossman, A.Y., 1976, Xylobotryum andinum, a tropical pyrenomycete from norther California, Mycotaxon 4: 179–183.Google Scholar
  64. Samuels, G.J., and E. Müller, 1980, Life histories of Brazilian ascomycetes 8. Thamnomyces chordalis (anam.: Nodulisporium) and Camillea bacillum (anam.: Geniculosporium) with notes on taxonomy of the Xylariaceae, Sydowia 33: 274–281.Google Scholar
  65. Samuels, G.J., and J.D. Rogers, 1987, Camarops flava sp. nov., Apiocamarops alba gen. et sp. nov., and notes on Camarops scleroderma and C. ustulinoides, Mycotaxon, 28:45–59.Google Scholar
  66. Samuels, G.J., J.D. Rogers, and E. Nagasawa, 1987, Studies in the Amphisphaeriaceae (sensu lato). 1. Collodiscula japonica and its anamorph, Acanthodochium collodisculae, Mycotaxon 28: 453–459.Google Scholar
  67. Samuels, G.J., and A.Y. Rossman, 1992, Thuemenella and Sarawakus, Mycologia 84: 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sherwood, M.A., 1977, The ostropalean fungi, Mycotaxon 5: 1–277.Google Scholar
  69. Sherwood, M.A., 1981, Convergent evolution in discomycetes from wood and bark, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 82: 15–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uecker, F.A., 1976, Development and cytology of Sordaria humana, Mycologia 68: 30–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Uecker, F.A., 1989, A timed sequence of development of Diaporthe phaseolorum (Diaporthaceae) from Stokesia laevis, Memoirs of the New York Botanical Garden 49: 38–50.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. D. Rogers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant PathologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations