Implications of the Holomorph Concept for Ascomycete Systematics

  • D. R. Reynolds
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 269)


The expectation for ascomycetous species expressed by de Bary in 1887 is still prevalent. A life cycle with morphological expression of the ascal stage was the norm. The mitotic fungus was considered as a sometimes more frequently expressed intermittant life cycle stage. The mitotic and meiotic species were acknowledged as rare and derived from the loss of a pleomorphous life cycle stage.

In a contemporary sense, the ascomycete species with a pleomorphic life cycle are fewer in number than those species that morphologically express only meiotic or only mitotic reproduction. Yet, the anamorph and the teleomorph stages of the pleomorphic species have a predictive role as indicators of phylogenetic trends that can provide a basis for a single system of classification.

The recognition of meiotic, mitotic and pleomorphic holomorphs in fungal systematics has both taxonomic and nomenclatural implications which are discussed with examples from the Capnodiaceae and Mycosphaerella.

The merger of mitotic and meiotic ascomycetes into a single system of classification is recommended as a specific goal for ascomycete systematics in the 1990s.


Sexual Reproduction American Phytopathological Society Commonwealth Mycological Institute Mitosporic Fungus Ascomycete Species 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alcorn, J.L., 1983, Generic concepts in Drechslera, Bipolaris and Exoserohilum, Mycotaxon 27: 1–86.Google Scholar
  2. Barr, M.E., 1987, Prodromus to Class Loculoascomycetes, Privately printed, ME Barr, Amherst, Mass.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, M.E. and C.T. Rogerson, 1983, Two new species of loculoascomycetes, Mycotaxon 27: 247–252.Google Scholar
  4. Bary, A. de, 1887, Comparative Morphology and Biology of the Fungi, Mycetozoa and Bacteria, [English transi. H.E.F. Garnsey, revised I.B. Balfour], Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. Berbee, M. and J.W. Taylor, 1993, Ascomycete relationships: dating the origin of asexual lineages with 18s ribosomal RNA gene sequence data, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 67–78. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  6. Corlett, M., 1991. An annotated list of the published names in Mycosphaerella and Sphaerella. [Mycological Monograph No. 18.] J. Cramer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  7. Culberson, W.L., 1986, Chemistry and sibling speciation in the lichen-forming fungi: ecological and biological considerations, The Bryologist, 89: 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellis, M.B., 1971, Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.Google Scholar
  9. Eriksson, O.E. and D.L. Hawksworth, 1991, Outline of the ascomycetes — 1990, Systema Ascomycetum 9: 39–271.Google Scholar
  10. Farr, D.F., G.F. Bills, G.P. Chamuris, and A.Y. Rossman, 1989, Fungi on plants and plant products in the United States, American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  11. Greuter, W., H.M. Burdet, W.G. Chaloner, V. Demoulin, R. Grolle, D.L. Hawksworth, D.H. Nicholson, P.C. Silva, F. A. Stafleu, E.G. Voss, and J. McNeill, eds., 1988., International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Fourteenth International Botanical Congress, Berlin, July-August, 1987. [Regnum Vegetabile No. 118.] Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein.Google Scholar
  12. Hanlin, R.T., 1990. Ilustrated Genera of Ascomycetes. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Hawksworth, D.L., B.C. Sutton, and G.C. Ainsworth, 1983, Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi, 7th edn, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Kew.Google Scholar
  14. Hennebert, G.L., 1991. Article 59 and the problem with pleoanamorphic fungi, Mycotaxon 40: 479–496.Google Scholar
  15. Hennebert, G.L., 1993, Toward a natural classification of the fungi, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 283–294. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  16. Kendrick, [W.] B., ed., 1979, The Whole Fungus, National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  17. LoBuglio, K. and J.W. Taylor 1993, Penicillium species, subgenus Biverticillium, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 115–119. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  18. Luttrell, E.S., 1979, Deuteromycetes and their relationships, In: The Whole Fungus ([W.] B. Kendrick, ed.) 1: 241-264. National Museums of Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  19. Poelt, J., 1970, Das Konzept der Artenpaare bei den Flechten, Vörtrage aus dem Gesamtgebeit der Botanik, N.F. 4: 187–198.Google Scholar
  20. Poelt, J. 1972. Die taxonomische Behandlung von Artenparren bei den Flechten. Botaniska Notiser 125: 77–81.Google Scholar
  21. Reynolds, D.R., 1993, The fungal holomorph: an overview, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 15–25. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  22. Reynolds, D.R., and J.W. Taylor 1993, The Fungal Holomorph: A Consideration of Meiotic, Mitotic and Pleomorphic speciation, CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  23. Reynolds, D.R., and J.W. Taylor, 1994, Higher fungi genera: their holomorphic content, Mycologia Helvetica 6: 123–140.Google Scholar
  24. Robinson, H., 1975, Considerations on the evolution of lichens, Phytologia 32: 407–413.Google Scholar
  25. Rossman, A.Y., G.J. Samuels, and R. Lowen. Leuconectria clusiae gen. nov. and its anamorph Gliocephalotrichum bulbilium with notes on Pseudonectria, Mycologia 85: 685–704.Google Scholar
  26. Simmons, E.G., 1952, Culture studies in the genus Pleospora, Clathrospora, and Leptosphaeria, Mycologia 44: 330–365.Google Scholar
  27. Sivanesan, A. 1984, The Bitunicate Ascomycetes and their Anamorphs, J. Cramer, Vaduz.Google Scholar
  28. Sutton, B. 1993, Mitosporic fungi (deuteromycetes) in the Dictionary of the Fungi, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 27–55. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  29. Tehler, A. 1982, The species pair concept in lichenology, Taxon 31: 708–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turgeon, G., S.K. Christiansen, and O.C. Yoder, 1993, Mating type genes in ascomycetes and their imperfect relatives, In: The Fungal Holomorph (D.R. Reynolds and J.W. Taylor, eds): 199–215. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. R. Reynolds
    • 1
  1. 1.Natural History Museum of Los Angeles CountyLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations