Advertisement

Wildfire Detection with a Microsatellite

  • Paul J. Thomas
  • Charles Hersom
  • Saad Al Kenany
  • Doug Staley

Abstract

Wildfires (Table 1) tend to be small objects that are hot compared to the ambient thermal environment. They occur infrequently and give rise to clustered events when large. Systems have been developed for fire detection from an aircraft platform1,2. A small, incipient wildfire can be masked by the forest canopy for some directions of viewing. Wildfires can make the transition from incipient’ to ‘large’ in a time interval as short as one hour. The economic impact of wildfires can be significant, on the order of billions of dollars annually worldwide. Early detection and regular monitoring of wildfire events are valuable, to constrain human activity in the affected regions and to allow timely decisions on active intervention for fire suppression3.

Keywords

Attitude Sensor Attitude Control System Fire Detection Detector Pixel Disturbance Torque 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Paul J. Thomas and Nixon O, Near-infrared forest fire detection concept, Applied Optics 32 (27), 20 September 1993, pp. 5348–5355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. David Nichols, Firefly system concept, SPIE Vol. 1540, Infrared Technology XVII, December 1991, pp. 202–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Kourtz, The need for improved forest fire detection, For. Chron. 63, 272 (1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Paul J. Thomas, Charles Hersom, Peter Kourtz, Gary Buttner, Space-based forest fire detection concept, SPIE Vol. 2553, Infrared Spaceborne Remote Sensing III (1995), pp. 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul J. Thomas, Allan B. Hollinger, R.H. Wiens, Adaptive infrared forest fire sensor, SPIE Vol. 1969, April 1994, pp. 370–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paul J. Thomas, Erik Lithopoulos, Sylvain Pelletier and Stephen Law, Image processing for forest fire detection, Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, Toronto, 13–16 September 1992, paper WA3.31.1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    C.F. Gartrell, C.L. Butner, B.E. Flanders, Applications of small satellites to global-change measurements, SPIE Vol. 1691, Small Satellite Technologies and Applications II (1992), pp. 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Donald V. McMillen, Model “T” satellite (T-SAT) series small satellites designed for scientific and commercial use, SPIE Vol. 1495, Small Satellite Techology and Applications (1991), pp. 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    R. Peralta, J. Mendieta, J. Prado, A. Peralta, M. Navarrete, Y. Fairuzov, Bus development for a multitask engineering test satellite: SATEX, SPIE Vol. 1940, Small Satellite Technology and Applications III (1993), pp.214–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    SILA Satellite Project Executive Summary, Prof. Doug Staley, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa Ontario, Canada, K1S–5B6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W.J. Larson, J.R. Wertz, Space Mission Analysis and Design: Second Edition, Microcosm Inc., 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    James R. Wertz, Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control, Kluwer Anademic Publishers, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul J. Thomas
    • 1
  • Charles Hersom
    • 1
  • Saad Al Kenany
    • 1
  • Doug Staley
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Space and Terrestrial ScienceNorth York
  2. 2.Carleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations