Low Latency Optical Bus for Multiprocessor Architecture

  • Laurent Fesquet
  • Jacques Henri Collet


Many computing applications require a processing power that necessitates a parallel organization of architecture. The architectures we consider include both tightly coupled multiprocessor machines and clusters of workstations. The execution of parallel applications generally implies numerous exchanges between the different processors through a communication system, the performance of which must be appreciated in terms of throughput and latency. The throughput specification characterizes correctly the voluminous exchanges but is inadequate for describing elementary exchanges (from one to several words of data). The latency, defined as the time elapsed between the request for an elementary data and its delivery, implicitly accounts for all the layers crossed between the communicating nodes and for the communication throughput in the transport of the elementary data. Whatever application we consider, the network latency represents one bottleneck which limits the global performance. The reduction of the access latency to remote memory to a value close to the local RAM access time is a crucial factor to be considered when searching to improve the performance of a multiprocessor architecture. The utilization of optical communications has been considered for many years by computer scientists1,2,3,4,5 but how to interconnect processors via a transparent optical network with a short communication latency is an still open question. Several point to point optical links operating around 0.5–1 Gbit/s/channel have been constructed6,7.


Network Latency Mesh Topology Destination Address Optical Packet Incoming Packet 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    M. Feldman, S. Esener, C. Guest, and S. Lee Comparison between optical and electrical interconnects based on power and speed considerations; Appl. Opt., 27:742–751 (1988).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Jahns and Murdocca; Crossover Networks and their Optical Implementation Appl. Opt. 27:3155–3160 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Sauer; A multi-Gb/s optical interconnect SPIE, Proc. Digital Opt. Comp. Il 1215:198–207 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chunming Qiao and Rami Melhem Reconfiguration with Time Division Multiplexed MIN’s for multiprocessor communications; IEEE Trans. On Parallel and distributed Systems 5:337–352 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    D.M. Chiarulli, S.P. Levitan, R.G. Melhem, M. Bidnurkar, R. Ditmore, G. Gravenstreter, Z. Guo, C. Qiao, M.F. Sakr, a, d J.P. Teza; Optoelectronic Busses for High-Performance Computing Proceedings of IEEE, 82:1701–1710 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yiu-Manet al.; Technology development of a high density 32-channel 16 Gb/s optical data link for optical interconnection applications for the optoelectronic technology consortium; Journal of Lightwave Technology 13:995 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Nishikido, S. Fujita, Y. Arai, Y. Akahori, S. Hino, and K. Yamasaki Multigigabit multichannel optical interconnection module for broadband switching system; Journal of Lightwave Technology 13:1104–1110 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P.R. Prucnal; Optically Processed Self-routing, Synchronization, and Contention Resolution for ID and 2D photonic switching architecture; IEEE, Quantum Elect. 29:600 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Cotter and S.C. Cotter; Algorithm for binary Word Recognition suited to Ultrafast nonlinear Optics; Electronics Letters 29:945 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Laurent Fesquet
    • 1
  • Jacques Henri Collet
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire d’Analyse et d’Architecture des Systèmes du CNRSToulouse CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations