Skip to main content

A Model for Performing System Performance Analysis in Predesign

  • Chapter
Book cover Applications of Human Performance Models to System Design

Abstract

Two areas of digital simulation are particularly relevant to valid system performance during predesign: mission modelling and man-machine modelling. In this paper, the latter technique is emphasized. The architecture (including the artificial intelligence components) and validation data for a particular model are presented. The components of the predesign process are illustrated in Fig. 1. This process has evolved from, and been applied to a variety of weapons systems (cf. Refs. 1, 2 & 3) and documents (for example, Refs. 4, 5 & 6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Taylor, R.R. and Poole, E.R., A Mission Oriented Approach to Cockpit Design as Applied to Observation and Attack Helicopters, American Helicopter Society 40th Annual Forum, Arlington, VA, May 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holley, C.D. and Parks, R.E., Predicting Man-Machine System Performance in Predesign, Bell Helicopter, Textron, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Graf, V.A. and Holley, C.D., Human Factors Impact on the V-22 Osprey Cockpit Development: An Overview, American Helicopter Society, Washington, D.C., June 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Human Engineering Requirements for Measurement of Operator Workload, ADS-30, U.S. Army Research and Technology Laboratories (AVSCOM), St. Louis, MO, November 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  5. O’Donnell, R.D. and Eggemeir, T., Workload Assessment Methodology, “Handbook of Perception and Human Performance;’ Vol. 2, Cognitive Processes in Performance, K.R. Boff, L. Kaufman and J.P. Thomas (eds), Wiley, New York, NY, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Human Engineering Design Criteria for Military Systems, Equipment, and Facilities, MIL-STD-1472C, Department of Defence, May 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sticha, P.J., Analytical Models of Performance of Procedure, IEEE, 0547–3578/84/0000–0841, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell, D.T. and Stanley, J.C., “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research;’ McNally, Chicago, IL, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sequitur’s Workload Analysis System (SWAS): User’s Manual, Sequitur Systems, Fort Worth, TX, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Karger, D.W. and Bayha, F.H.,“Engineered Work Measurement;’ Industrial Press, New York, NY, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Generic Data System, Methods Time Measurement ( MTM) Association, Fair Lawn, NJ, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel, A.I. and Wolf, J.J.,“Man-Machine Simulation Models;’ Wiley, New York NY, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wickens, D.C., Processing Resources in Attention, “Varieties of Attention;’ R. Parasuraman and R. Davies (eds), Academic Press, New York, NY, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wickens, D.C., The Structure of Attentional Resources,“Attention and Performance VIII;’ R. Nickerson and R. Pew (eds), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wickens, D.C., Mountford, S.J. and Schreiner, W.S., Multiple Resources, Task-Hemispheric Integrity, and Individual Differences in Time-Sharing Efficiency, Human Factors 23, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Multidimensional Scaling of Task Relationships, Sequitur Working Papers, Sequitur Systems, Fort Worth, TX, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Carroll, J. and Chang, J., Analysis of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling via an N-way Generalization of Eckart-Young Decomposition, Psychometrika 35, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Derrick, W.L., The Relationship Between Processing Resource and Subjective Dimensions of Operator Workload, “Human Factor Society 25th Annual Meeting, Proceedings,” 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Advanced Rotorcraft Technology Integration: Interim Report, BHTI Report 677–099–02, Bell Helicopter, Fort Worth, TX, May 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Advanced Rotorcraft Technology Integration: Flight Test Report, BHTI Report 677–099–026, Bell Helicopter, Fort Worth, TX, August 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Holley, C.D. (1989). A Model for Performing System Performance Analysis in Predesign. In: McMillan, G.R., Beevis, D., Salas, E., Strub, M.H., Sutton, R., Van Breda, L. (eds) Applications of Human Performance Models to System Design. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9244-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9244-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9246-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9244-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics