Solid to Plasma Transition in Fs-Laser-Irradiated Fe: Collapse of the Spin-Orbit Gap

  • M. K. Grimes
  • Y.-S. Lee
  • M. C. Downer


Quantitative measurements of the optical conductivity of iron under earth core conditions are important in modelling geomagnetism1. We approximate such conditions transiently2 by exciting an Fe, and a control Al, surface in a vacuum or helium environment with 620 nm, 120 fs FWHM laser pulses with 105 peak-background contrast ratio at .6 ps focussed to peak intensities 1011 < I < 1015 W/cm2 on target. Figs. 1 and 2 present p- and s- polarized self-reflectivity R p,s (θ, I) for constant incident angle θ and peak intensity I, respectively. Geometric correction for the dependence of spot shape on θ has been made in plotting the data. Using very linear pulse energy reference monitors, reproducibility to within ∆R/R ≤ 0.1% was achieved. This allowed measurement of very slight reflectivity changes, as shown in the inset of Fig. 1. This figure also shows that the reflectivities of Fe and Al in the solid to plasma transition region (1013 – 1015 W/cm2) approach each other as I increases, consistent with their similar total conduction electron densities (n e ≃ 1.8 × 1023 cm−3) when the Fe d-electrons are included. This suggests qualitatively that progressive unbinding of the d-electrons dominates the changes in optical properties of Fe in this regime. Fig. 2 provides evidence that a density gradient develops during the laser pulse. It is well known3 that θ min the angle at which the minumum p-polarized reflectivity occurs, shifts toward smaller angles as the density gradient scale length grows. Although the largest angle of incidence attainable in the experiment was smaller than θ min under these conditions, the data clearly indicate a shift toward smaller values, seen for Fe in Fig. 2 as a crossing of the p-polarized data sets.


Optical Conductivity Riemann Solution5 Plasma Transition Resonance Term Spot Shape 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. A. Jacobs, The Earth’s Core, Academic Press, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. C. Downer, H. Ahn, D. H. Reitze, D. M. Rife, X. Y. Wang, in Laser Interactions with Atoms, Solids, and Plasmas, edited by R. M. More, Plenum Press, New York, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    O.L. Landen, D.G. Stearns, E.M. Campbell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1475 (1989); O.L. Landen, B.T. Vu, D.G. Stearns, W.E. Alley, in SPIE Conference Proceedings Vol. 1413, Short-Pulse High-Intensity Lasers and Applications (1991).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. M. Milchberg, R. R. Freeman, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6, 1351 (1989).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ya.B. Zeldovich and Yu.P. Rainer, Physics of Shock Waves and High-Temperature Hydrodynamic Phenomena, Ch. 1, Academic Press, New York, 1966.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N.W. Ashcroft and K. Sturm, Phys. Rev. B, 3, 1898 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Singh, C.S. Wang, and J. Callaway, Phys. Rev. B 11, 287 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.N. Glezer, Y. Siegal, L. Huang, and E. Mazur, Phys. Rev. B 51, 6959 (1995).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Grimes
    • 1
  • Y.-S. Lee
    • 1
  • M. C. Downer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations