Abstract
Therapists typically treat a wide range of persons for a diversity of problems. One way to reduce the complexity and difficulty of making decisions about treatment is to fall into a pattern of routinely relying on one particular treatment approach. And as in assessment, this strategy may work well with many of the types of problems we treat. However, although routinely relying on a particular approach may often work well, we consider it important to be open to alternatives. Being pragmatic contributes to choosing the most effective ways for treating children because it places no limits on the nature or type of approach that we adopt, other than the pragmatic constraint that it works. Thus, although we (like everyone else) do have preferred treatment approaches, in the end the criterion we advocate and try to put into practice is to be guided by what works with the present problems and populations we are treating.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silverman, W.K., Kurtines, W.M. (1996). Building Blocks. In: Anxiety and Phobic Disorders. Clinical Child Psychology Library. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9212-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9212-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-45227-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9212-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive