Advertisement

The Evolution of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods

  • James A. Poupard
  • Stephen F. Rittenhouse
  • Lori R. Walsh
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 349)

Abstract

It is reasonable to conclude that antibiotic testing did not precede the concept of antibiotics, therefore, it is logical to start the review with penicillin and the work of Alexander Fleming. It should be noted that the history of antibiotic testing is no different than other topics in the history of science, there are always relevant predecessors to whatever event is chosen as the starting point for the subject. It would be negligent to fail to mention the work of Paul Ehrlich as well as several early observations that seem worthy of note before focusing on the evolution of the events leading to the contemporary field of antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

Keywords

Susceptibility Testing Disk Diffusion Clinical Microbiology Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Broth Dilution 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lechevalier, H.A. and Solotorvsky M. 1965 Three Centuries of Microbiology. McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts, W. Studies on biogenesis. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, 164:466, 1874.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wheat, P.F. and Spencer, R.C. 1988. The evolution of in-vitro antimicrobial susceptibility techniques J. of Antimicrob. Chemother. 22:579–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Isenberg, H.D. 1988. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: A critical evaluation. J. of Antimicrob. Chemother. 22 suppl. A. 73–86.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wilson, E., Henry, D.A. and Smith, J.A. 1990. Disk elution method for MICs and MBCs. Antimicrobial Agents & Chemo. 34:2128–2132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stubs, K.G. and Wicher, K. 1977. Laboratory evaluation of an automated antimicrobial susceptibility system. Am. J. Clin. Path. 68:769–777.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walsh, L. 1991. An International Survey of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Methods Employed in the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, Medical Col. of PA., Univ. Microfilm International, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pouaprd, J.A. 1982. A Comparison and Evaluation of Relevance of Clinical Microbiology Master’s Degree Programs in the U.S. Univ. of PA., Univ. Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Mich.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McKie, J., Borovoy, R., Dooley, J., Evanega, G. Mendoza, G., Meyer, F., Moody, M., Packer, D., Praglin, J., and Smith, H. 1974. Autobac I — A three hour automated antimicrobial susceptibility system II Microbiological Studies. In Automation in Microbiology & Immunology. ed., Heden C. and Illeni, T. N.Y., John Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spencer, H.J., Stockert, J., Welaj, P., Wilborn, R., and Price, B. 1977. Automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing with the MS-2 system. In Rapid Methods and Automation in Microbiology ed. Johnston, H.H. and Newsom, SWB. pp 262–263.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aldridge, C., Jones, P.W., Gibbson, S. Lanham, J. Myer, M., Vannest, R., and Charles, R. 1977. Automated microbiological detection/identification system. J. of Clin. Micro. 6:406–413.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Piddock, L.J.V. 1990 Techniques used for the determination of antimicrobial resistance and sensitivity in bacteria. J. of Applied Bact. 68:307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Poupard
    • 1
  • Stephen F. Rittenhouse
    • 1
  • Lori R. Walsh
    • 2
  1. 1.SmithKline BeechamKing of PrussiaUSA
  2. 2.Abington Memorial HospitalAbingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations