The Craniofacial Evidence for Anthropoid and Tarsier Relationships

  • Callum Ross
Part of the Advances in Primatology book series (AIPR)

Abstract

Monkeys and apes have long been observed to resemble humans in the external appearance of the head, having a globular braincase, a short snout, and forward-facing eyes. In 1864, Mivart grouped them in the suborder, Anthro-poidea, distinct from the Lemuroidea, to which he assigned lemurs, lorises, galagos, aye-ayes, and tarsiers (Mivart, 1864, p. 635). Although Mivart later (1873) identified a lengthy list of features distinguishing anthropoids from lemuroids, he maintained that New and Old World anthropoids had evolved in parallel from separate nonprimate ancestors. Mivart’s conception of An-thropoidea—a polyphyletic taxon united by numerous distinctive features of the skull—thrived in the intellectual milieu of the “classical primatological synthesis” in which parallelism was seen as a widespread phenomenon (e.g., Le Gros Glark, 1934, 1959; Simpson, 1945, 196D. However, with the adoption by primate systematists of the principles of phylogenetic systematics (Hennig, 1966) and, later, of the parsimony criterion for choosing between competing hypotheses of evolutionary relationships, the assumption of widespread parallelism fell out of vogue. Anthropoids have come to be interpreted as a closed descent community (sensu Ax, 1985), and their distinctive features have been reinterpreted as synapomorphies inherited from an ancestral stem species.

Keywords

Internal Carotid Artery Auditory Tube Transverse Septum Carotid Canal Pterygoid Plate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Albeich, P. 1985. Problems with the interpretation of developmental sequences. Syst. Zool. 34: 46–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ax, P. 1985. Stem species and the stem lineage concept, Cladistics 1:279–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beard, K. C. 1988. The phylogenetic significance of strepsii hinism in Paleogene primates. Int. J. Primatot. 9:83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beard, K. C., and Godinot, M. 1988. Carpal anatomy of Smilodeites gracilis (Adapiformes, Noth- arctinae) and its significance for Lemuriform phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol. 17:71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beard, K. C., Dagosto, M., Ciebo, D. L., and Godinot, M. 1988. Interrelationships among primate higher taxa. Nature 331:712–714.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beard, K. C., Krishtalka, L., and Stucky, R. K. 1991. First skulls of the Early Eocene primate Shoshomus cooperi and the anthropoid—tarsier dichotomy. Nature 349:64–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beecher, R. M., 1977. Function and fusion at the mandibular symphysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 47:325–330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Beecher, R. M., 1979. Functional significance of the mandibular symphysis. J. Morphol. 159:117–130.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Beecher, R. M., 1983. Fvolution of the mandibular symphysis in Notharctinae (Adapidae, Primates). Int. J. Primatol. 4:99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bown, F. M., and Rose, K. D. 1987. Patterns of dental evolution in early Eocene anaptomorphine primates (Omomyidae) from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Palcont. Soc. Mem. 23. J. Palcont. 61(5):suppl.Google Scholar
  11. Cartmill, M. 1970. The Orbits of Arboreal Mammals. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  12. Cartmill, M. 1972. Arboreal adaptations and the origin of the Order Primates. In: R. H. Tuttle (ed.), The Functional and Fvolutionan Biology of Primates, pp. 97–122. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  13. Cartmill, M. 1978. The orbital mosaic in prosimians and the use of variable traits in systematica. Folia Primatol. 30:89–114.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cartmill, M. 1980. Morphology, function and evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Fvolutionan Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 243–274. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cartmill, M. 1983. Assessing tarsier affinities: Is anatomical description phylogenetically neutral? Oeobios Mem. Spec. 6:153–101.Google Scholar
  16. Cartmill, M., and Kay, R. F. 1978. Graniodental morphology, tarsier affinities, and primate suborders. In: D. J. drivers and K. A. Joysey (eds.), Recent Advances in Primatology, Vol. 3, pp. 205–214. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  17. Cartmill, M., MacPhee, R. D. F., and Simons, F. t.. 1981. Anatomy of the temporal bone in early anthropoids with remarks on the problem of anthropoid origins. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 56: 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cave, A. J. F. 1907. Observations on the platyrrhine nasal fossa. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 26:277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cave, A.J. F., and Haines, R. VV. 1940. I he paranasal sinuses of the anthropoid apes. J. Anat. 74:493–523.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Chappill, J. A. 1989. Quantitative characters in phylogenetic analysis Cladistics 5:217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Conroy, O. C. 1980. Ontogenv, auditory structures and primate evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 52:443–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Covert, II. II,, and Williams, B. A. 1991. The anterior dentition oi’Washakius iusignis and adapid— anthropoidean affinities. J. Hum. Fvol. 21:403–407.Google Scholar
  23. Dagosto, M. 1988. Implications of postcranial evidence for the origin of Fuprimates. J. Hum. Fvol. 17:35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dagosto, M. 1990. Models for the origin of the anthropoid postcranium. J. Hum. Fvol. 19:121–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diamond, M. K. 1992. Homology and evolution of the orbitotemporal venous sinuses of humans. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 88:21 1–244.Google Scholar
  26. Farle, C. 1897a. On the affinities of Tarsius: A contribution to the phylogeny of the Primates. Am. Naturalist 31:509–087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karle, C. 1897b. Relations of Tarsi us to the lemurs and apes. Science 5:258–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Karle, C. 1897c. Further considerations on the systematic position of larsius. Science 5:057–058.Google Scholar
  29. Elliot Smith, O. 1919. On the zoological position and affinities of Tarsi us. Proc. Zool. Soc. Fond. 1919:405–475.Google Scholar
  30. Felsentein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the boost rap. Fvolution 39(4):783–791.Google Scholar
  31. Franzen, J. K. 1987. Fin neuer Primate aus dem Mitteleozän der Grube Messel (Deutschland, S-Hcssen). Cour. Forsch. Inst. Senckenberg 91:151–187.Google Scholar
  32. Gebo, D. F. 1980. Anthropoid origins—the foot evidence. J. Hum. Fvol. 15: 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gebo, D. F. 1989. Locomotor and phylogenetic considerations in anthropoid evolution. J. Hum. Fvol. 18:191–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gebo, D. L., and Dagosto, M. 1988. Foot anatomy, climbing and the origin of the Indriidae. J. Hum. J. Fvol. 17:135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, E. 1812. Tableau des Quadrumanes, Ou des animaux composant le premier Order de la Classe des Mammifères. Ann. Mus. Hist. Nat. 19:85–122, 156–170.Google Scholar
  36. Gervais, P. 1854. Histoire Naturelle des Mammifères. Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Gingerich, P. D. 1973. Anatomy of the temporal bone in the Oligocene anthropoid Apidium and the origin of the Anthropoidea. Fol. Primatol. 19:329–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Cranial anatomy and evolution of the early Tertiary Plesiadapidae. Univ. Michigan Pap. Paleontol. 15:1–141.Google Scholar
  39. Gingerich, P. D. 1980. Eocene Adapidae, paleobiogeography, and the origin of South American Platyrrhini. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continental Drift, pp. 123–138. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gingerich, P. D. 1984. Primate evolution: Evidence from the fossil record, comparative morphology and molecular biology. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 27:57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gingerich, P. D., and Martin, R. D. 1981. Cranial morphology and adaptations in Eocene Adapidae. II The Cambridge skull of Adapis parisiensis. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 56:235–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gingerich, P. D., and Schoeninger, M. 1977. The fossil record and primate phylogeny. J. Hum. Evol, 6:483–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Gunnell, G. F. 1989. Evolutionary History of Microsyopoidea (Mammalia, ? Primates) and the Relationship between Plesiadapiformes and Primates. University of Michigan Papers on Paleontology No. 27. The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  44. Haines, R. W. 1950. The interorbital septum in mammals. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 41:585–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hennig, W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematica. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.Google Scholar
  46. Hershkovitz, P. 1977. Living New World Monkeys (Platyrrhini). Volume1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Honey, J. G. 1990. New washakiin primates (Omomyidae) from the Eocene of Wyoming and Colorado, and comments on the evolution of the Washakiini. J. Vert. Paleont. 10:206–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1896. Die Keimblase von Tarsius. Festschr. Cegenbaur. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  49. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1897a. The Descent of the Primates. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  50. Hubrecht, A. A. W. 1897b. Relations of Tarsius to the lemurs and apes. Science 5:550–551.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Hylander, W. L. 1977. In vivo bone strain in the mandible of Cal ago crassicaudatus. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 46:309–326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hylander, W. L. 1979. An experimental analysis of temporomandibular joint reaction force in macaques. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 51:433–456.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hylander, W. L. 1984. Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: A test of competing hypotheses. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 64:1–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Hylander, W. L. 1985. Mandibular function and biomechanical stress and scaling. Am. Zool. 25:315–330.Google Scholar
  55. Kampen, C. J. van. 1905. Die Tympanalgegend des Säugetierschädels. Cegenbaurs Morphol. Jahrb. 34:321–722.Google Scholar
  56. Kay, R. F., Thewissen, J. G. M., and Yoder, A. D. 1992. The cranial anatomy of Ignacius graybullianus and the affinities of the Plesiadapiformes. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 89:477–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kay, R. F. and Cartmill, M. 1977. Cranial morphology and adaptations of Palaechthon nacimienti and other Paromomyidae (Plesiadapoidea, ? Primates), with a description of a new genus and species. J. Hum. Evol. 6:19–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kay, R. F., Thorington, R. W. Jr. and Houde, P. 1990. Eocene plesiadapiform shows affinities with flying lemurs not primates. Nature 345:342–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kermack, K. A., Musset, F. and Rigney, H. W. 1981. The skull of Morganucodon. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 71:1–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1981. Evolution of the therian mammals in the Late Cretaceous of Asia. Part IV. Skull structure in Kennalestes and Asioryctes. Palaeont. Pol. 42:25–78.Google Scholar
  61. Kielan-Jaworowska, Z. 1984. Evolution of the therian mammals in the Late Cretaceous of Asia. Part V. Skull structure in Zalambdalestidae. Palaeont. Pol. 46:107–117.Google Scholar
  62. Klauuw, C. J. van der. 1931. On the auditory bulla in some fossil mammals with a general introduction to this region of the skull. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 62:1–352.Google Scholar
  63. Le Gros Clark, W. E. 1934. On the skull structure of Pronycticebus gaudryi. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1934:19–27.Google Scholar
  64. Le Gros Clark, W. E. 1959. The Antecedents of Man. Harper, New York.Google Scholar
  65. MacPhee, R. D. 1981. Auditory regions of primates and eutherian insectivores: Morphology, ontogeny and character analysis. Contrib. Primatol. 18:1–282.Google Scholar
  66. MacPhee, R. D. K., and Cartmill, M. 1986. ßasicranial structures and primate systematics. In: D. R. Swindler and J. Erwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1 : Systematics, Evolution and Anatomy, pp. 219–275. Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  67. MacPhee, R. D. E., Cartmill, M. and Gingerich, P. D. 1983. New Palaeogene primate basicrania and the definition of the order Primates. Nature 301:509–511.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Margush, T., and McMorris, E. R. 1981. Consensus n-trees. Bull. Math. Biol. 43:239–244.Google Scholar
  69. Martin, R. D. 1990. Primate Origins and Evolution. A Phylogenetic Reconstruction. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  70. Mishler, B. D., Donoghue, M. J., and Albeit, V. A. Undated. Ehe decay index as a measure of robustness within a cladogram.Google Scholar
  71. Mivart, St. G.J. 1804. Notes on the crania and dentition of the Lemuridae. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1864:011–048.Google Scholar
  72. Mivart, St. G. J. 1873. On Lepilemur and Cheirogaleus, and on the zoological rank of the Lemuroidea. Proc. Zool. Soc. Land, 1873:484–510.Google Scholar
  73. Müller, J. 1934. Ehe orbitotemporal region of the skull of the Mammalia. Arch. Neerl. Zool. 1:118–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Northcutt, R. G. 1990. Ontogeny and phylogeny: A re-evaluation of some conceptual relationships and some applications. Brain Behav. Evol. 36:1 10–140.Google Scholar
  75. Novacek, M. J. 1980. Ehe skull of leptictid insectivorans and the higher-level classification of eutherian mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 183:1–112.Google Scholar
  76. Pocock, R. I. 1918. On the external characters of lemurs and of Tarsius. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 1918:19–53.Google Scholar
  77. Radinsky, L. B. 1970. I he fossil record of prosimian brain evolution. In: C. Noback and W. Montagna (eds.), The Primate Brain. Advances m Primatology, Vol. 1, pp. 209–224. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  78. Radinsky, L. B. 1979. The Eossil Evidence of Primate Brain Evolution (James Arthur Lecture). American Museum of Natural History, New York.Google Scholar
  79. Rasmussen, D. I. 1980. Anthropoid origins: A possible solution to the Adapidae-Omomyidae paradox. J. Hum. Evol. 15:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Rasmussen, D. T. 1990. Ehe phylogenctic position of Mahgarita stevensi: Protoanthropoid or lemuroid? Int. J. Primatol. 11:439–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rasmussen, D. E, and Simons, E. L. 1988. New specimens of Oligopithecus savagei, early Oligocene primate from Egypt. Eol. Primatol. 51:182–208.Google Scholar
  82. Rasmussen, D. E, and Simons, E. L. 1992. Paleobiology of the Oligopithecines, the earliest known anthropoid primates. Int. J. Primatol. 13:1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ravosa, M. J. 1991. Structural allometry of the prosimian mandibular corpus and symphysis. J. Hum. Evol. 20:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rose, K. D, and Bown, E. M. 1991. Additional fossil evidence on the differentiation of the earliest euprimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:98–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rosenberger, A. L. 1985. In favor of the Nerrolemur-ldrsicv hypothesis. Eol. Primatol. 45:179–194.Google Scholar
  86. Rosenberger, A. E., and Szalay, E. S. 1980. On the tarsiiform origins of Anthropoidea. In: R. L. Ciochon and A. B. Chiarelli (eds.), Evolutionary Biology of the New World Monkeys and Continen tal Drift, pp. 139–157. Plenum Press. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Ross, C. E. 1991. Muscle attachment and the function of the haplorhine postorbital septum. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. [Suppl.] 12:154.Google Scholar
  88. Ross, C. F. 1993. The Eunctions of the Postorbital Septum and Anthropoid Origins. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar
  89. Ross, C. F. 1994. The muscular and osseous anatomy of the primate anterior temporal fossa and the functions of the postorbital septum. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. (in review).Google Scholar
  90. Ross, C. F., and Ravosa, M. 1993. Basicranial flexion, relative brain size and facial kyphosis in anthropoid primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 91:305–324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Russell, D. E. 1964. Les mammifères paléocène d’Europe. Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Paris [C] 13:1–321.Google Scholar
  92. Saban, R. 1963. Contribution a l’étude de l’os temporal des primates. Description cliez l’bomme et les prosimiens. Anatomie comparée et pliylogenie. Mem. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Pans [A] 29:1–378.Google Scholar
  93. Scbmid, P. 1981. Comparison of Eocene nonadapids and Tarsi us. In: A. B. Cbiarelli and R. S. Corrucini (eds.), Primate Evolutionary Biology. Selected Papers (Part A) of the Vlllth Congress of the International Primatological Society, pp. 6–13. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  94. Simons, E. L. 1972. Primate Evolution. An introduction to Man’s Place in Nature. Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Simons, E. L. 1989. Description of two genera and species of Late Eocene Antbropoidea from Egypt. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 86:9956–9960.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Simons, E. L. 1991. Additional evidence on the differentiation ot the earliest euprimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:98–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Simons, E. L. 1992. Diversity in the early Tertiary anthropoidean radiation in Africa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10743–10747.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Simons, E. L., and Rasmussen, D. T. 1989. Cranial anatomy of Aegyptopithecus and Tarsi us and the question of the tarsier—Anthropoidean clade. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 79:1–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Simons, E. L., and Russell, D. 1960. Notes on the cranial anatomy of Necrolemur. Breviora 127: 1–14.Google Scholar
  100. Simpson, C. C. 1945. Ehe principles of classification and a classification of mammals. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 85:1–350.Google Scholar
  101. Simpson, C. C. 1961. Principles of Animal Taxonomy. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  102. Skelton, R. R., and Mcllenry, H. 1992. Evolutionary relationships among early hominids. J. Hum. Evol. 23:309–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Sober, E. 1989. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. , Mil Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  104. Spat/, W. B. 1968. Die Bedeutung der Augen fur die sagittale Gestaltung des Schädels von Tarsi us (Prosimiae, Tarsiif ormes). Fol. Primatol. 9:22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Stehlin, H. C. 1912. Die Säugetiere des schweizerischen Eoceäns. (britischer Catalogen der Mate-rialen. VII(l): Adapts. Abh. Schweiz. Palaont. Ces. 38:1 165–1298.Google Scholar
  106. Swofford, D. L. 1991. PAUP, Phylogenese Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1. Computer program distributed by the Illinois Natural History Survey, Champaign, Illinois.Google Scholar
  107. Szalay, F. S. 1973. New Paleocene primates and a diagnosis of the new suborder Paomomyiformes. Fol. Primatol. 19:73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Szalay, F. S. 1975. Phylogeny of primate higher taxa: Ehe basicranial evidence. In: W. P. Luckett and F. S. Szalay (eds.), Phylogeny of the Primates: A Multidisciplinary Approach, pp. 91–125. Plenum Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Szalay, F. S. 1976. Systematica of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates): Taxonomy, phylogeny and adaptations. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156:157–450.Google Scholar
  110. Szalay, F. S., and Dagosto, M. 1988. Evolution of hallucial grasping in the primates. J. Hum. Evol. 17:1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Szalay, F. S., and Delson, ¥,. 1979. The Evolutionary History of the Primates. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  112. Szalay, F. S., and Wilson, J. A. 1976. Basicranial morphology of the early Tertiary tarsiiform Rooneyia from Texas. Fol. Primatol. 25:288–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Szalay, F. S., Rosenberger, A. L., and Dagosto, M. 1987. Diagnosis and differentiation of the Order Primates. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol.30:75–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Wible, J. R. 1984. The Ontogeny and Phylogeny of the Mammalian Cranial Arterial Pattern. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.Google Scholar
  115. Wible, J. R. 1986. Transformations in the extracranial course of the internal carotid artery in mammalian phylogeny. J. Vert. Paleontol. 6:313–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Wible, E.. 1990. Petrosals of late Cretaceous marsupials from North America and a ciadistic analysis of the petrosal in therian mammals. J. Vert. Paleontol. 10:183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Wiley, F. O). 1981. Phyloornetics: The Theory and Practice of Phylooenede Sysfematics. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  118. Williams, P. L., Warwick, R., Dyson, M., and Bannister, L. II. 1989. dray’s Anatomy, 37th cd. Churchill Livingstone, London.Google Scholar
  119. Wilson, J. A., and Slalay, F. S. 1975. New adapid primate ol european affinities from Texas. Fol. Primatol. 25:294–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wormian, J. L. 1903–04. Studies of Kocene Mammalia in the Marsh Collection, Peabody Museum. Part II. Primates. Am. J. Sci. 15:103–170, 399–414, 419–430; 16:345–308; 17:23–33, 133–140, 203–214.Google Scholar
  121. Yoder, A. D. 1992. The Phylogenese Affinities of the Cheirogaleidae: A Molecular and Morphological Analysis. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Duke University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Callum Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biological Anthropology and AnatomyDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations