Skip to main content

From Perception to Conception

  • Chapter
Annals of Theoretical Psychology

Part of the book series: Annals of Theoretical Psychology ((AOTP,volume 10))

Abstract

As I began to read George Butterworth’s chapter, I thought that surely we were going to disagree. He begins by espousing Gibson’s ‘direct realism’ theory of perception, a theory that I have not found to be particularly helpful in my quest to understand the conceptual foundations of the mind. But as he elaborated his understanding of this view, and contrasted it with the more traditional constructivist view of Piaget, I came to realize that despite differences in terminology our views of the perceptual foundations of knowledge are very similar. We agree on the import of recent work on infant perception, and that perceptual functioning forms the initial basis for gaining knowledge about the world. However, we seem to disagree on the extent to which Gibson’s theory is apt to provide a sufficient basis for understanding conceptual growth. I will first summarize our points of agreement, and then discuss the problems to which our common belief in the perceptual foundations of knowledge lead us.

Preparation of this contribution was supported in part by NSF Research Grant BNS-8519218 and DBS-9221867.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baillargeon, R. (1993). The object concept revisited: New directions in the investigation of infents’ physical knowledge. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, M. S. & Salapatek, P. (1983). Infant visual perception. In M. M. Haith & J. J. Campos (Eds.), Infancy and developmental psychobiology (pp. 435–571), Vol. 2. of P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertenthal, B. (1992). Infents’ perception of biomechanical motions: Intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In C. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S. & Bowerman, M. (1992). Learning to express motion events in English and Korean: The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41, 83–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (1985). Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infents’ performance on AB. Child Development, 56, 868–883.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, J. F., III, & Singer, L. T. (1979). The role of simple feature differences in infants’ recognition of feces. Infant Behavior & Development, 2, 39–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fantz, R. L., & Miranda, S. B. (1975). New born infant attention to form of contour. Child Development, 46, 224–228.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, N., Kagan, J., & Weiskopf, S. (1979). The growth of memory during infancy. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 99, 91–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, N. H., Lloyd, S., & Sinha, C. G. (1980). Infant search tasks reveal early concepts of containment and canonical usage of objects. Cognition, 8, 243–262.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., & Spelke, E. S. (1983). The development of perceptioa In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Cognitive Development (pp. 1–76), Vol. 3 of P. Mussen (Ed.), Manual of child psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, E. J., & Walker, A. S. (1984). Development of knowledge of visual-tactual affordances of substance. Child Development, 55, 453–460.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., Cassel, T. Z., & Bamborough, P. (1974). Tracking by young infants. British Journal of Psychology, 65, 345–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofsten, C., von (1982). Eye-hand coordination in the newborn. Developmental Psychology, 18, 450–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofsten, C., von, & Lindhagen, K. (1979). Observations on the development of reaching for moving objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 28, 158–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). Principles of psychology. New York: Holt.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janowsky, J. S. (1985). Cognitive development and reorganization after early brain injury. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1986). From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children’s metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition, 23, 95–147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kellman, P. J. (1988). Theories of perception and research in perceptual development. In A. Yonas (Ed.), Perceptual development in infancy (pp. 267–281). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellman, P.J. (1993). Kinematic foundations of infant visual perceptioa In C.E. Granrud (Ed.), Visual perception and cognition in infancy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad, V.T. (1991), April). Understanding of containment in 5.5-month-old infants. Poster presented at the meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, G. (1989). Memory: Conscious and unconscious. In P. R. Soloman, G. R. Goethals, C. M. Kelley, & B. R. Stephens (Eds.), Memory: Interdisciplinary approaches. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J. M. (1988). How to build a baby: On the development of an accessible representational system. Cognitive Development, 3, 113–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J.M. (1992). How to build a baby: II. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99, 587–604.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J.M. (in press). Precursors of linguistic knowledge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler, J.M. & McDonough, L. (1993). Concept formation in infancy. Cognitive Development, 8, 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meltzoff, A. N., & Borton, R. W. (1979). Intermodal matching by human neonates. Nature, 282, 403–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D. (1986). On categorization in early infancy. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 32, 331–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, P.C., Eimas, P.D., & Rosenkrantz, S.L. (1993). Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3-month-old and 4-month-old infants. Perception, 22, 463–475.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruff, H. A. (1986). Components of attention during infants’ manipulative explo-ratioa Child Development, 57, 105–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., McClelland, J. L., & the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (1976).Infants’ intermodal perception of events. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 626–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (1985). Preferential-looking methods as tools for the study of cognition in infancy. In G. Gottlieb & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Measurement of audition and vision in the first year of postnatal life (pp. 323–363). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E. S. (1988). Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: The apprehension of objects in infancy. In A. Yonas (Ed.), Perceptual development in infancy (pp. 197–234). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelan, E. & Smith, L.B. (in press). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, H., & Kaplan, B. (1963). Symbol formation. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mandler, J.M. (1994). From Perception to Conception. In: van Geert, P., Mos, L.P., Baker, W.J. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Annals of Theoretical Psychology, vol 10. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9194-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9194-5_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9196-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9194-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics