Co-constructionism: What is (and is not) in a name?

  • Jaan Valsiner
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 10)


Discussion of co-constructionism as a theoretical orientation participates in parallel in two social discourses. First, it serves as a re-classificatory device for the discourse about developmental psychology as a scientific discipline. Secondly, it acts as a conceptual canalizer for the construction of developmental methodology. It is in the latter discourse that co-constructionism can lead to novel solutions to old problems in developmental psychology. Elaborations in the realm of developmentally adequate methodology lead to the centrality of irreversible time and emerging phenomena in any theory construction.


Social Institution Knowledge Construction Personal Opinion Theory Construction Psychological Phenomenon 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bateson, G. (1971). The message “this is play”. In R.E. Herron & B. Sutton-Smith (Eds.), Child’s play (pp. 261–266). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Bazerman, C. (1987). Codifying the social scientific style: the APA Publication Manual as a behaviorist rhetoric. In J.S. Nelson, A. Megill, & D.N. McCloskey (Eds.), The rhetoric of the human sciences (pp. 125–144). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  3. Behar, R. (1990). Rage and redemption: reading the life story of a Mexican marketing woman. Feminist Studies, 16, 2, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs, J.L. (1979). The creation of value in Canadian Inuit society. International Social Science Journal, 31, 3, 393–403.Google Scholar
  5. Catan, L. (1986). The dynamic display of process: Historical development and contemporary uses of the microgenetic method. Human Development, 29, 252–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devereux, G. (1967). From anxiety to method in the behavioural sciences. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  8. Elbers, E. (1986). Interaction and instruction in the conservation experiment. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 1, 1, 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foucault, M. (1983). This is not a pipe. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gigerenzer, G. (1993). The superego, the ego, and the id in statistical reasoning. In G. Keren & C. Lewis (Eds.), A handbook for data analysis in the behavioral sciences: Methodological issues (pp. 311–339). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Gigerenzer, G., Zwijtink, Z., Daston, L., Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of chance: How probability changed science and everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Goés, M.C.R. (1992). The modes of participation of others in the functioning of the subject. Paper presented at the First Conference on Socio-Cultural Studies, Madrid, September 15–18.Google Scholar
  13. Gregersen, H., & Sailer, L. (1993). Chaos theory and its implications for social science research. Human Relations, 46, 7, 777–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hermans, H. J. M. (1991). The person as co-investigator in self-research: valuation theory. European Journal of Personality, 5, 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hermans, H.J.M. & Bonarius, H. (1991a). The person as co-investigator in personality research. European Journal of Personality, 5, 199–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermans, H.J.M. & Bonarius, H. (1991b). Static laws in a dynamic psychology? European Journal of Personality, 5, 245–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermans, H.J.M., Kempen, H.J.G., & van Loon, R.J.P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 1, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kindermann, T. & Valsiner, J. (1989). Strategies for empirical research in context-inclusive developmental psychology. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Cultural context and child development: Towards a culture-inclusive developmental psychology (pp. 13–50). Toronto-Gottingen-Bern: C.J. Hogrefe and H. Huber.Google Scholar
  19. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In W. Kessen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology. Vol. 1. History, theory & methods (pp. 295–356). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Lamb, S., & Wozniak, R. (1990). Developmental co-construction: metatheory in search of method. Contemporary Psychology, 35, 9, 853–854.Google Scholar
  21. Lewin, K., & Lippitt, R. (1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy: a preliminary note. Sociometry, 1, 3–4, 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lightfoot, C., & Folds-Bennett, T. (1992). Description and explanation in developmental research: separate agendas. In J. Asendorpf & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Stability and change in development: A study of methodological reasoning (pp. 207–228). Newbury Park, Ca.: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Linell, P., & Marková, I. (1993). Acts in discourse: From monological speech acts to dialogical inter-acts. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 23, 2, 174–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marková, I. (1990). A three-step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue. In I. Marková & K. Foppa(Eds.), The dynamics of dialogue (pp. 129–146. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester.Google Scholar
  25. Marková, I. (1994). Sociogenesis of language: Perspectives on dialogism and on activity theory. In W. de Graaf & R. Maier (Eds.), Sociogenesis re-examined. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Mead, G.H. (1932). The philosophy of the present. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  27. Oliveira, Z.M.R., & Rossetti-Ferreira, M.C. (1994). Understanding of co-constructive nature of human development: role coordination in early peer interaction. In J. Valsiner & H.G. W. Voss (Eds.), The structure of learning processes. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  28. Reed, E.S. (1993). The intention to use a specific affordance: a conceptual framework for psychology. In R.H. Wozniak & K.W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context (pp. 45–76). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  29. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Rogoff, B. (1992). Three ways of relating person and culture. Human Development, 35, 5, 316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rogoff, B. (1993). Children’s guided participation and participatory appropriation in sociocultural activity. In R.H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context (pp. 121–153). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Rogoff, B., Chavajay, P., & Matusov, E. (1993). Questioning assumptions about culture and individuals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 533–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rommetveit, R. (1979a). On negative rationalism in scholarly studies of verbal communication and dynamic residuals in the construction of human inter-subjectivity. In R. Rommetveit & R. Blakar (Eds.), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication (pp. 147–161). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rommetveit, R. (1979b). On common codes and dynamic residuals in human communication. In R. Rommetveit & R. Blaker(Eds.), Studies of language, thought and verbal communication (pp. 163–175). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Savage-Rumbaugh, E.S., Murphy, J., Sevcik, R.A., Brakke, K.E., Williams, S.L., & Rumbaugh, D.M. (1993). Language comprehension in ape and child. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58, 3–4 (serial No. 233).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schubauer-Leoni, M.L. (1989). Didactic interactions in mathematics. Dossiers de Psychologie (Université de Neuchâtel), No. 37, 37–46.Google Scholar
  37. Schutz, A., & Luckmann, T. (1973). The structures of the life-world. Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Siegler, R.S., & Crowley, K. (1991). The microgenetic method: A direct means for studying cognitive development. American Psychologist, 46, 606–620.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smolka, A.L.B. (1990). School interactions: An analysis of speech events in a Brazilian public school setting. Paper presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, October 19–21.Google Scholar
  40. Smolka, A.L.B. (1992). Towards the co-constructive methodology in the study of human development. Paper presented at the First Conference on Socio-Cultural Studies, Madrid, September 15–18.Google Scholar
  41. Smolka, A.L.B. (1993). A dinamica discursive no ato de escrever: Relacoes oralidade escritura. In A.L.B. Smolka & M.C. Goés (Eds.), A linguagem e o outro no espaco escolar: Vygotsky e a construçao do conhecimento. Campinas: Papyrus.Google Scholar
  42. Smolka, A.L.B. (1994). Discourse practices and the issue of internalization. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and Theoretical Discourse in Social-Cultural Studies. Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
  43. Smolka, A.L.B., Fontana, R.A.C., & Laplane, A.L.F. (1994). The collective process of knowledge construction: Voices within voices. In A. Rosa and J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and Theoretical Discourse in Social-Cultural Studies. Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
  44. Smolka, A.L.B., Goés, M.C., and Pino, A. (1994). The constitution of the the subject: A persistent question. In J. Wertsch & B. Rogoff (Eds.), Sociocultural studies of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Smollett, E.W. (1975). Differential enculturation and social class in Canadian schools. In T.R. Williams (Ed.), Socialization and communication in primary groups (pp. 221–231). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  46. Thorngate, W. (1992). Evidential statistics and the analysis of developmental patterns. In J.B. Asendorpf & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Stability and change in development (pp. 63–83). Newbury Park, CA.: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Torczyner, H. (1979). Magritte: The true art of painting. New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.Google Scholar
  48. Trevarthen, C. (1988). Universal co-operative motives: How infants begin to know the language and culture of their parents. In G. Jahoda & I. Lewis (Eds.), Acquiring culture: cross-cultural studies in child development (pp. 37–90). London: Croom HelmGoogle Scholar
  49. Whinger, H. (1920). Die Philosophie des als ob: System der theoretischen, praktischen und religiosen Fiktionen der Menschheit. (4th ed.) Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  50. Wenti, S.S., & Good, J.M.M. (1991). Social affordances and interaction. Ecological Psychology 3, 2, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Valsiner, J. (1984a). Two alternative epistemological frameworks in psychology: The typological and variational modes of thinking. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 4, 449–470.Google Scholar
  52. Valsiner, J. (1984b). The childhood of the Soviet citizen: Socialization for loyalty. Ottawa: Carleton University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Valsiner, J. (1987). Culture and the development of children’s action. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  54. Valsiner, J. (1988). Culture is not an independent variable: A lesson from cross-cultural research for “mainstream” psychology. Paper presented at the symposium The contributions of cross-cultural psychology to mainstream psychological theory at 24th International Congress of Psychology, Sydney, Australia, September 2.Google Scholar
  55. Valsiner, J. (1989). Human development and culture. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  56. Valsiner, J. (1991). Construction of the mental: From the “cognitive revolution” to the study of development. Theory & Psychology, 1, 4, 477–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Valsiner, J. (1993). Irreversibility of time and the construction of historical development psychology. Paper presented at the XII Biennial Meetings of the International Society for the Study of Behavioural Development, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, July 19–23, 1993.Google Scholar
  58. Valsiner, J. (1994). James Mark Baldwin and his impact: Social development of cognitive functions. In A. Rosa & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Historical and Theoretical Discourse in Social-Cultural Studies Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje.Google Scholar
  59. Valsiner, J., & Cairns, R.B. (1992). Theoretical perspectives on conflict and development. In C.U. Shantz & W.W. Hartup (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 15–35). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Valsiner, J., & Van der Veer, R. (1993). The encoding of distance: The concept of the zone of proximal development and its interpretations. In R. R. Cocking & K. A. Renninger (Eds.), The development and meaning of psychological distance (pp. 35–62). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  61. Van Geert, P. (1992). Vygotsky’s dynamic systems. Comenius, 12, 4 (Whole No. 48), 383–401.Google Scholar
  62. Vasconcellos, V.M.R., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Construction of personal place at 18 months of age: A co-constructionist analysis. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, Philadelphia, PA., June 5.Google Scholar
  63. Von Hofsten, C. (1993). Prospective control: A basic aspect of action development. Human Development, 36, 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vygotsky, L.S., & Luria, A.R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  65. Vygotsky, L.S., & Luria, A.R. (1994). Tool and symbol. In R. van der Veer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Vygotsky Reader Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Wertsch, J.V. (1991). Voices in the mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wertsch, J.V. (1993). Commentary. Human Development, 36, 168–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wertsch, J.V., & O’Connor, K. (1992). The cognitive tools of historical representation: A sociocultural analysis. Paper presented at the First Socio-Cultural Studies Conference, Madrid, Spain, September.Google Scholar
  69. Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, culture, and cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Winegar, L.T. (1988). Children’s emerging understanding of social events: Co-construction and social process. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), Child development within culturally structured environments. Vol. 2. Social co-construction and environmental guidance of development (pp. 3–27). Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar
  71. Winegar, L.T., & Valsiner, J. (1992). Re-contextualizing context: Analysis of metadata and some further elaborations. In L.T. Winegar & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Children’s development within social context. Vol 2. Research and methodology (pp. 249–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  72. Winegar, L.T., Renninger, K.A., & Valsiner, J. (1989). Dependent independence in adult-child relationships. In D. A. Kramer & M. J. Bopp (Eds.), Movement through form: Transformation in clinical and developmental psychology (pp. 157–168). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaan Valsiner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA

Personalised recommendations