Theory Building as Communication

  • John A. Meacham
Part of the Annals of Theoretical Psychology book series (AOTP, volume 10)


Vonèche and Aeschlimann have accepted as their task the critical analysis and interpretation of a paragraph set forth by the co-editors of this volume. In this paragraph questions were raised regarding how progress in developmental theory-building should proceed, by selection of the best theory over others or by integration of various theories and, if by integration, whether by means of eclecticism or through a synthesis of opposites. My assignment is the critical analysis and interpretation of the 100 or so paragraphs put forward by Vonèche and Aeschlimann, in which they have rightly raised difficult and even troubling questions about the meanings of the terms employed in the initial paragraph. For example, what does progress mean? I expect that my own comments will be subjected to further critical analysis and interpretation by Vonèche, Aeschlimann, and others, and that their third-order analysis will in turn undergo additional interpretation by the co-editors, the readers of this volume, and so forth.


Prospective Theory Individual Development Theory Building Positivistic Science Conjunctive Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altaian, L. (1987). Centripetal and centrifugal trends in psychology. American Psychologist, 42, 1058–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beard, C. A. (1932). Introduction. In J. B Bury (Ed.), The idea of progress: An inquiry into its origin and growth (pp. ix-xl). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Bury, J. B. (1932). The idea of progress: An inquiry into its origin and growth. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  4. Bynum, W. F., Browne, E. J., & Porter, R. (1981). Dictionary of the history of science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Daele, L. D., van den (1969). Qualitative models in developmental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 1, 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Geert, P., van (1986). The concept of development. In P. L. C. van Geert (Ed.), Theory building in developmental psychology (pp. 3–50). Amsterdam: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Geert, P. van (1987). The structure of developmental theories: A generative approach. Human Development, 30, 160–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Meacham, J. A. (1980). Formal aspects of theories of development. Experimental Aging Research, 6, 475–487.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Meacham, J. A. (1981). Political values, conceptual models, and research. In R. M. Lerner & N. A. Busch-Rossnagel (Eds.), Individuals as producers of their development: A life-span perspective (pp. 447–474). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Meacham, J. A. (1984). The individual as consumer and producer of historical change. In K. A. McCluskey &H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Historical and generational effects (pp. 47–71). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Meacham, J. A., & Santilli, N. R. (1982). Interstage relationships in Erikson’s theory: Identity and intimacy. Child Development, 53, 1461–1467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Morris, E. K., Hursh, D. E., Winston, A. S., Gelfand, D. M., Hartmann, D. P., Reese, H. W., & Baer, D. M. (1982). Behavior analysis and developmental psychology. Human Development, 25, 340–364.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris, W. (Ed.). (1969). The American heritage dictionary of the English language. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  16. Nisbet, R. (1980). History of the idea of progress. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Walsh, W. H. (1967). Philosophy of history: An introduction. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • John A. Meacham
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations