Sociobiology and Differential Psychology

The Arduous Climb from Plausibility to Proof
  • Arthur R. Jensen

Abstract

Rushton has performed a most necessary service to the advancement of behavioral science. He has indicated, succinctly yet quite comprehensively, how differential psychology can fruitfully be brought under the purview of the newly developing science of sociobiology. We may rather safely predict that his effort will meet at least temporary resistance. In the long history of differential psychology (i.e., the study of individual and group differences in behavioral traits) and in the comparatively short history of sociobiology (i.e., the study of the biological basis of social behavior) we have seen tides of opposition beyond the usual technical criticism and analysis which are a normal accompaniment to all important scientific endeavor. The resistance has evinced more of the character of the resistance which has been seen historically in connection, not with normal science, but with true scientific revolutions in the Kuhnian sense. In such cases, science has invaded areas of deep human concern and seemingly threatened entrenched theories of man’s nature and place in the universe. The apposition of evolutionary biology and human individual and group differences and social behavior, as proposed in Rush-ton’s essay, will be perceived by some as a similar threat to humans’ welfare and self-esteem.

Keywords

Brain Size Brain Weight Total Body Surface Area Color Blindness Cranial Capacity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), A model for intelligence. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1982.Google Scholar
  2. Harrison, G. A., Weiner, J. S., Tanner, J. M., & Barnicot, N. A. Human biology: An introduction to human evolution, variation, and growth. London: Oxford University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
  3. Ho, K-C, Roessmann, U., Straumfjord, J. V., & Monroe, G. Analysis of brain weight: I. Adult brain weight in relation to sex, race, and age. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 1980, 104, 635–639. (a)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ho, K-C., Roessmann, U., Straumfjord, J. V., & Monroe, G. Analysis of brain weight: II. Adult brain weight in relation to body height, weight, and surface area. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 1980, 104, 640–645. (b)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ho, K-c., Roessmann, U., Hause, L., & Monroe, G. Newborn brain weight in relation to maturity, sex, and race. Annals of Neurology, 1981, 10, 243–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jensen, A. R. Educability and group differences. New York: Harper & Row, 1973.Google Scholar
  7. Jensen, A. R. Bias in mental testing. New York: Free Press, 1980. (a)Google Scholar
  8. Jensen, A. R. Uses of sibling data in educational and psychological research. American Educational Research Journal, 1980, 17, 153–170. (b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen, A. R. Straight talk about mental tests. New York: Free Press, 1981.Google Scholar
  10. Jensen, A. R. The debunking of scientific fossils and straw persons. Contemporary Education Review, 1982, 1, 121–135.Google Scholar
  11. Jensen, A. R. The effects of inbreeding on mental ability factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 1983, 4, 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jensen, A. R., & Reynolds, C. R. Race, social class and ability patterns on the WISC-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 1982, 3, 423–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Laycock, F., & Caylor, J. S. Physiques of gifted children and their less gifted siblings. Child Development, 1964, 35, 63–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Loehlin, J. C., Lindzey, G., & Spuhler, J. N. Race differences in intelligence. San Francisco: Freeman, 1975.Google Scholar
  15. Osborne, R. T., & McGurk, F. C. J. (Eds.). The testing of Negro intelligence (Vol. 2). Athens, Georgia: Foundation for Human Understanding, 1982.Google Scholar
  16. Passingham, R. E. The brain and intelligence. Brain, Behavior, and Evolution, 1975, 11, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Passingham, R. E. Brain size and intelligence in man. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 1979, 16, 253–270.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Van Valen, L. Brain size and intelligence in man. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 1974, 40, 417–424.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur R. Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Human LearningUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations