Abstract
Teleological theory is shown to rely upon final causation, which in turn also makes use of formal-cause patternings as the ‘that’ for the sake of which events are being intended. In the rise of science over the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the belief crystallized that it was possible to explain events by reducing them to underlying material and efficient causation. Cartesian mathematics made it appear that motion caused patterns to come about and hence was basic to patterns. Modern physics has changed all this, placing the formal cause at the center of explanation. The unseating of material and especially efficient causation in science makes it possible for psychology to formulate telic theory. Formal causation is germane to meaning, and human beings can be seen to behave for the sake of such meaningful patterns. Mechanism is shown to be an instrumentality rather than a basic cause of behavior. Logical learning theory is presented as an example of telic theorizing. It is argued that unless psychology meets the challenge of teleological description it will never emerge as a distinctive area of study with a unique contribution to the family of the sciences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aristotle. Posterior analytics and Topics. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 8). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
Bacon, F. Advancement of learning. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 30). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
Bandura, A. The self system in reciprocal determinism. American Psychologist, 1978, 33, 344–358.
Bandura, A. Self-referent mechanisms in social learning theory. American Psychologist, 1979, 34, 439–440.
Blumenthal, A. L. The founding father we never knew. Contemporary Psychology, 1979, 24, 547–550.
Bohm, D. Causality and chance in modern physics. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, 1957.
Bohr, N. Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1934.
Boring, E. G. A history of experimental psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1950.
Bradley, J. Mach’s philosophy of science. London: Athlone Press, 1971.
Brewer, W. F. There is no convincing evidence for operant or classical conditioning in adult humans. In W. B. Weimer & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
Burtt, E. A. The metaphysical foundations of modern physical science (rev. ed.). Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1955.
Cassirer, E. The problem of knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1950.
de Broglie, L. A general survey of the scientific work of Albert Einstein. In P. Schilpp (Ed.), Albert Einstein, philosopher scientist (Vol. 1). New York: Harper & Row, 1949.
Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. Personality and psychotherapy: An analysis in terms of learning, thinking, and culture. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1950.
Easterbrook, J. A. The determinants of free will. New York: Academic Press, 1978.
Einstein, A. Essays in science. New York: Philosophical Library, 1934.
Farrington, B. Francis Bacon: Philosopher of industrial science. New York: Henry Schuman, 1949.
Feuer, L. S. Einstein and the generations of science. New York: Basic Books, 1974.
Frank, P. Philosophy of science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1957.
Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley, 1958.
Hull, C. L. Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
Jonçich, G. The sane positivist: A biography of Edward L. Thorndike. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press, 1968.
Kant, I. The critique of pure reason. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 42). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
Kelley, H. H. The processes of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 107–128.
Kelly, G. A. The psychology of personal constructs (2 vols.). New York: Norton, 1955.
Kondo, H. Albert Einstein and the theory of relativity. New York: Franklin Watts, 1969.
Kuhn, T. S. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970 [1st edition, 1962].
Kuhn, T. S. The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977.
Marrow, A. J. The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books, 1969.
Mountcastle, V. B. The view from within: Pathways to the study of perception. Johns Hopkins Medical Journal 1975, 136, 109–131.
Mussen, P. The psychological development of the child (3rd. ed.). Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1979.
Neisser, U. Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Oppenheimer, R. Analogy in science. American Psychologist, 1956, 11, 127–135.
Page, M. M. Demand characteristics and the verbal operant conditioning experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 23, 304–308.
Penfield, W. The mystery of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1975.
Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. The self and its brain. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1977.
Randall, J. H., Jr. The development of scientific method in the school of Padua. Journal of the History of Ideas, 1940, 1, 177–206.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 1943, 10, 18–24.
Royce, J. R. The encapsulated man: An interdisciplinary essay on the search for meaning. Princeton, N.J.: Van Nostrand, 1964.
Russell, B. Introduction to mathematical philosophy. London: Allen & Unwin, 1919.
Rychlak, J. F. (Ed.), Dialectic: Humanistic rationale for behavior and development. Basel, Switzerland: Karger, 1976.
Rychlak, J. F. The psychology of rigorous humanism. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1977.
Rychlak, J. F. Discovering free will and personal responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 1979.
Rychlak, J. F. The false promise of falsification. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1980, 1, 183–195.
Rychlak, J. F. A philosophy of science for personality theory (2nd ed.). Malabar, Florida: Krieger, 1981. (a)
Rychlak, J. F. Introduction to personality and psychotherapy: A theory-construction approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1981. (b)
Rychlak, J. F. Freud’s confrontation with the telic mind. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1981, 17, 176–183. (c)
Rychlak, J. F. Logical learning theory: Propositions, corollaries, and research evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981, 40, 731–749. (d)
Sameroff, A. J., & Cavanagh, P. J. Learning in infancy: A developmental perspective. In J. D. Osofsky (Ed.), Handbook of infant development. New York: Wiley, 1979.
Schrödinger, E. Discussions of probability relations between separated systems. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (Vol. 31). Cambridge, England, 1935.
Simon, Y. The great dialogue of nature and space [Edited by G. J. Dalcourt]. Albany, N.Y.: Magi Books, 1970 .
Slife, B. D. Psychology’s reliance on linear time: A reformulation. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 1981, 2, 27–46.
Spence, K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1956.
Sperry, R. W. Bridging science and values: A unifying view of mind and brain. American Psychologist, 1977, 32, 237–245.
Taylor, R. Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior: A rejoinder. Philosophy of Science, 1950, 17, 327–332.
Tolman, E. C. Purposive behavior in animals and men. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1967.
Virgil. Theaeneid. In R. M. Hutchins (Ed.), Great books of the western world (Vol. 13). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, 1952.
Watson, J. B. Behaviorism. New York: Norton, 1924.
Weimer, W. B., & Palermo, D. S. (Eds.). Cognition and the symbolic processes. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1974.
Weizenbaum, J. Computer power and human reason: From judgment to calculation. San Francisco: Freeman, 1976.
Wiener, N. The human use of human beings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1954.
Wightman, W. P. D. The growth of scientific ideas. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1951.
Zilsel, E. The origins of Gilbert’s scientific method. In P. P. Wiener & A. Noland (Eds.), Roots of scientific thought. New York: Basic Books, 1957.
Zukav, G. The dancing wu li masters: An overview of the new physics. New York: Bantam Books, 1979.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1984 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rychlak, J.F. (1984). The Nature and Challenge of Teleological Psychological Theory. In: Royce, J.R., Mos, L.P. (eds) Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9191-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9191-4_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9193-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9191-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive