Regional Air Quality Model Assessment and Evaluation

  • C. M. Bhumralkar
Part of the NATO · Challenges of Modern Society book series (NATS, volume 10)


It is important to know what fraction of a regional air quality impact comes from sulfur oxides and nitrogen oxides that are emitted by-fossil fuel power plants, as opposed to other sources. To meet this need, many theoretical models have been developed and evaluated to determine how well they are able to simulate atmospheric transport, diffusion and transformation processes. Schiermeier and Misra (1983) have reported the results of a joint U.S./Canadian studies, and Stewart et al. (1983) have evaluated a number of regional models for the National Park Service (NPS). This paper summarizes the results of a study that was undertaken jointly by SRI International, Argonne National Laboratory, and TRC Environmental Consultants for the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI). A more comprehensive reporting of the results has been published by Ruff et al. (1984).


Argonne National Laboratory Electric Power Research Institute National Park Service Washout Ratio Scavenge Coefficient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Boris, J.P., and D.L. Book, 1973: Flux Corrected Transport, I.SHASTA, A Fluid Transport Algorithm That Works. J. Comp. Phy., 11, 38–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chamberlain, A.C., 1953: Aspects of Travel and Deposition of Aerosols and Vapor Clouds. AERE Harwell Report R1261. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. Conover, W.M., 1980: Practical Nonparametric Statistics, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  4. Crawford, T.Y., 1966: A Computer Program for Calculating the Atmos-spheric Dispersion of Large Clouds. Lawrence Livermore Laboratory Report UCRL-50179, 56 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Endlich, R.M., K.C. Nitz, R. Brodzinsky, and C.M. Bhumralkar, 1984: A Long Range Transport Model for Eastern North America: Part 1 -Sulfur Oxides. Atmos. Environ., 16, 505–512.Google Scholar
  6. Fox, D.G., 1981: Judging Air Quality Model Performance—Review of the Woods Hole Workshop. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 62, 599–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gifford, F.A., 1982: Horizontal Diffusion in the Atmosphere: A Lagrangian-Dynamic Theory. Atmos. Environ., 16, 505–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Heffter, J.L., 1980: Air Resources Laboratories Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion Model (ARL-ATAD). Tech. Memo ERL-ARL-8lf, Air Resources Laboratories, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. McNaughton, D.J., 1984: Use of Currently Available Precipitation Data for Regional Air Quality Modeling, J. Air Poll. Contr. Assoc., 31, 250–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mueller, P.K. and G.J. Hidy, 1983: The Sulfate Regional Experiment: Report of Findings, EA-1901, Volume 1, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  11. Ruff, R.E., et al., 1984: Regional Air Quality Model Assessment and Evaluation. EPRI Report EA-3671, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California.Google Scholar
  12. Samson, P.J., M.J. Small, and B.T. Beryland, 1982: User’s Guide to the Atmospheric Contributions to Inter-Regional Deposition (ACID) Model. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  13. Schiermeier, F.A. and P.K. Misra, 1983: Evaluation of Eight Linear Regional Scale Sulfur Models by the Regional Modeling Subgroup of the United States/Canadian Memorandum of Intent Workgroup 2, APCA International Specialty Conference on the Meteorology of Acidic Deposition, Hartford, Conn.Google Scholar
  14. Scott, B.C., 1978: Parameterization of Sulfate Removal by Precipitation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 17, 1375–1381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sheih, C.M., M.L. Wesley, and B.B. Hicks, 1979: Estimated Dry Deposition Velocities of Sulfur Over the Eastern United States and Surrounding Regions. Atmos. Environ., 13, 1361–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sheih, C.M. and F.L. Ludwig, 1985: A Comparison of Numerical Pseudodiffusion and Atmospheric Diffusion. Atmos. Environ., 19, (in press).Google Scholar
  17. Stewart D.A., R.E. Morris and M.K. Liu, 1983: Evaluation of Long-Term Regional Transport Models of Interest to the National Park Service. Report SYSAPP 83/136, Systems Applications, Inc., San Rafael, California.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Bhumralkar
    • 1
  1. 1.Atmospheric Science CenterSRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations