Climatological Variability in the Evaluation of Cost Effectiveness of Emission Control Strategies to Reduce Acid Deposition

  • Jack D. Shannon
  • David G. Streets
Part of the NATO · Challenges of Modern Society book series (NATS, volume 10)

Abstract

One of the major problems with designing control strategies for acidic deposition is that potential future deposition patterns must be simulated using past meteorological conditions. We can estimate the future emission patterns that would result from the implementation of a given control strategy, but efforts to predict what effect these emission patterns would have on future deposition levels are hampered by uncertainty about future transport and deposition climatology. This problem has been set aside in most previous work by using a single past year of meteorological data as a surrogate for all future years. This meant that we could estimate the amount of deposition that would occur at a particular location as a result of a particular control strategy, and indeed we could design an emission reduction strategy to achieve a desired amount of deposition, but we could not predict how that level of deposition might fluctuate from year to year as a result of natural climatological variation. With the recent processing of a six-year record of meteorological data, however, these questions can now be investigated.

Keywords

Emission Reduction Control Cost Emission Reduction Strategy Atmospheric Transport Model Deposition Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Streets, D.G., D.A. Hanson, and L.D. Carter, “Targeted Strategies for Control of Acidic Deposition,” Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, 34, 1187 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    National Research Council, “Acid Deposition: Atmospheric Processes in Eastern North America,” National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1983).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shannon, J.D., “A Model of Regional Long-Term Average Sulfur Atmospheric Pollution, Surface Removal and Net Horizontal Flux,” Atmos. Environ., 15, 689 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Samson, P.J., University of Michigan, personal communication, 1985.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Final Report of Work Group 1, Submitted to the Coordinating Committee created under the August 5, 1980, Memorandum of Intent on Transboundary Air Pollution between the United States and Canada, January 1983.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gorham, E., F.B. Martin, and J.T. Litzau, “Acid Rain: Ionic Correlations in the Eastern United States,” Science, 225, 407 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jack D. Shannon
    • 1
  • David G. Streets
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Research DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonneUSA
  2. 2.Energy and Environmental Systems DivisionArgonne National LaboratoryArgonne

Personalised recommendations