Theories of Aggression

From Drives to Cognitions
  • Leonard D. Eron
Part of the The Plenum Series in Social/Clinical Psychology book series (SSSC)

Abstract

The first comprehensive theoretical account of the etiology of aggression which assigned a major role to learning theory was the monograph, Frustration and Aggression by Dollard, Doob, Miller, Mowrer, and Sears (1939), a group of psychologists at Yale University. Up until that time most psychologists considered aggression to be instinctual in nature and inherent in human beings as it was in other animal species. Although convinced of the centrality of learning in the development of aggressive behavior, the authors of the monograph did not disagree with the idea that there was a biological basis to aggression. As a matter of fact, they were influenced to a significant degree by the psychoanalytic thinking of that time. For Freud, pleasure seeking and pain avoidance were the basic mechanisms of mental functioning, and frustration occurred when these activities were blocked. The Yale researchers, who were basically behaviorists, proposed, however, to translate the Freudian propositions into more objective behavioral terms which could be put to empirical test. For example, the Yale group’s hypothesis about instigation to injure the frustrator finds a close parallel in Freud’s (1915) statement that “if the object is a source of unpleasant feelings...” this can eventually lead to “an aggressive inclination against the object... an instigation to destroy it” (p. 137).

Keywords

Aggressive Behavior Violent Behavior Aggression Relation Proactive Aggression Parental Nurturance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, L. (1962). Aggression: A social psychological analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, L. (1984). Some effects of thoughts on anti and prosocial influences of media events: A cognitive—neoassociation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 410–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, A. (1963). Physical aggression in relation to different frustrations. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 1–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cohen, R. (1955). Social norms, arbitrariness of frustration and status of the agent of frustration in the frustration—aggression hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 222–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodge, K. A., and Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H., and Sears, R. R. (1939). Frustration and aggression. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dubow, E., Huesmann, L. R., and Eron, L. D. (1988). Mitigating aggression and promoting prosocial behavior in aggressive elementary school boys. Behavior Research and Theory. 577–581.Google Scholar
  11. Eron, L. D. (1961). Use of theory in developing a design. In L. D. Eron (Ed.), Application of role and learning theories to the study of the development of aggression in children. Psychology Reports, 9, 292–334.Google Scholar
  12. Eron, L. D. (1982). Parent—child interaction, television violence and aggression of children. American Psychologist, 42, 435–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eron, L. D. (1987). The development of aggressive behavior from the perspective of a developing behaviorism. American Psychologist, 42, 435–442.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. R., Dubow, E., Romanoff, R., and Yarmel, P. W. (1987). Aggression and its correlates over 22 years. In D. Crowell, I. M. Evans and C. R. O’Donnell (Eds.), Childhood aggression and violence. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  15. Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. R., Lefkowitz, M. M., and Walder, L. O. (1974). How learning conditions in early childhood relate to aggression in late adolescence. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 44, 412–423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eron, L. D., Walder, L. O., and Lefkowitz, M. M. (1971). Learning of aggression. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  17. Feshbach, S. (1970). Aggression. In P. Mussen (Ed.), Carmichael’s manual of child psychology. (Vol. 2, pp. 159–259 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Freud, S. (1957). Instincts and their vicissitudes. Standard Edition (Vol. 14, pp. 109–140). London: Hogarth Press. (Original work published 1915 ).Google Scholar
  19. Guerra, N. G., and Slaby, R. G. (1990). Cognitive mediators of aggression in adolescent offenders: 2. Intervention. Developmental Psychology, 26, 269–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huesmann, L. R. (1977). Formal models of social behavior. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Experimental Social Psychology, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  21. Huesmann, L. R. (1980). Encoding specificity in observational learning. Paper presented at a Colloquium at Institute of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  22. Huesmann, L. R. (1982). Television violence and aggressive behavior. In D. Pearl, L. Bouthilet and P. Lazar (Eds.), Television and behavior: Ten years of scientific programs and implications for the 80’s. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  23. Huesmann, L. R. (1988). An information model for the development of aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 14, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huesmann, L. R., and Eron, L. D. (1984). Cognitive processes and the persistence of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behavior, 10, 243–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Klein, R., Brice, P., and Fischer, P. (1983). Mitigating the imitation of aggressive behaviors by changing children’s attitudes about media violence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 899–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huesmann, L. R., Guerra, N. G., Eron, L. D., Miller, L. S., Zelli, A., Wrobleska, J., and Adami, P. (1991). Mitigating the development of aggression in young children by changing their cognitions. Aggressive Behavior, 17, 75–76.Google Scholar
  27. Huesmann, L. R., Eron, L. D., Lefkowitz, M. M., and Walder, L. O. (1984). The stability of aggression over time and generations. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1120–1134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kazdin, A. (1987). Treatment of antisocial behavior in children: Current status and future directions. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 187–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lefkowitz, M. M., Eron, L. D. Walder, L. O., and Huesmann, L. R. (1977). Growing up to be violent: A longitudinal study of the development of aggression. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Miller, N. E. (1941). The frustration-aggression hypothesis. Psychological Review, 48, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Parke, R. D., and Slaby, R. G. (1983). The development of aggression. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology ( 4th ed., pp. 547–642 ). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Pastore, N. (1952). The role of arbitrariness in the frustration-aggression hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 47, 728–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., and Rasmussen, P. (1986). Cognitive social learning mediators of aggression. Child Development, 57, 700–711.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leonard D. Eron
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center for Group Dynamics, Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations