Evamain: Computerised System for the Evaluation of the Hand

  • Jean-Louis Thonnard
  • Léon Plaghki
  • Dominique Bragard
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 256)


The hand is a performant prehensile and sensory tool capable of the strongest grasp and the most delicate touch. The optimal use of our hands in everyday activities depends at the same time on anatomical integrity, joint range of motion, muscle strength, cutaneous sensibility and co-ordination or dexterity. Therefore each of these domains should be explored in a hand test battery. The evaluation of hand function is of critical importance in determining the extent of functional loss in patients with traumatic injuries or destructive diseases and in assessing the outcome of various surgical and rehabilitative procedures.12,23 Advances in reconstructive surgery and hand therapy depend in part on the quality of the methods used to perform these assessments.11,20


Grip Force Hand Function Precision Grip Power Grip Nerve Compression Syndrome 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, Joint motion: method of measuring and recording, The Academy, Chicago, (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A.A. Amis and J.H. Miller, The elbow — measurement of joint movement, Clin. Rheum. Dis. 8:571 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    W.D. Ashton, The Logit Transformation with Special Reference to its uses in Bioassay, Griffin, London (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Bell and E. Tomancik, Repeatability of testing with Semmes-Weinstein mono- filaments, J. Hand Surg. 12A:155 (1987).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J.A. Bell-Krotoski, Sensibility testing: state of the art, in: Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy, J.M. Hunter, L.H. Schneider, E.J. Mackin, A.D. Callahan, 3nd ed., The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.A. Bell-Krotoski, Light touch-deep pressure testing using Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, in: Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy, J.M. Hunter, L.H. Schneider, E.J. Mackin, A.D. Callahan, 3nd ed., The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J.A. Bell-Krotoski, and W.J. Buford, The force/time relationship of clinically used sensory testing instrument , J. Hand Ther. 1:76 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.C. Boone, S.P. Azen, and CM. Lim, Reliability of goniometric measurements, Phys. Ther. 58:1355 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A.D. Callahan, Sensibility testing: clinical methods, in: Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy, J.M. Hunter, L.H. Schneider, E.J. Mackin, A.D. Callahan, 3nd ed., The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.L. Dellon, Evaluation of Sensibility and Reeducation of Sensation in the Hand, William & Wilkins, Baltimore, (1981).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E.E. Fess, The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments, J. Hand Surg. 11A:621 (1986).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E.E. Fess, Documentation: essential elements of an upper extremity assessment battery, in: Rehabilitation of the Hand: Surgery and Therapy, J.M. Hunter, L.H. Schneider, E.J. Mackin, A.D. Callahan, 3nd ed., The C.V. Mosby Co., St. Louis (1990).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E.A. Fleishman, Dimensional analysis of psychomotor abilities, J. exp. Psychol. 48: 437 (1954).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    E.A. Fleishman and G.D. Ellison, A factor analysis of fine manipulative tests, J. appl. Psychol. 46:96 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    R.H. Gelberman, R.M. Szabo, R.V. Williamson, and M.P. Dimick, Sensibility testing in peripheral- nerve compression syndromes, J. Bone Joint Surg. 65A:632 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. Gibson, Observations on active touch, Psychol. Rev. 69:477 (1962).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    HCIMO, Adaptation hospitalière de la classification internationale des maladies et des opérations (Code ICD-9-CM). Université Catholique de Louvain. Département des Sciences Hospitalières et Médico Sociales. Centre d’informatique Médicale (1990).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Helliwell, A. Howe, and V. Wright, Functional assessment of the hand: reproducibility, acceptability, and utility of a new system for measuring strength, Ann. Rheum. Dis. 46:203 (1987).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    R.H. Jebsen, N. Taylor, R.B. Trieschmann, M.J. Trotter, and L.A. Howard, An objective and standardized test of hand function, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 50:311 (1969).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    L.A. Jones, The assessment of hand function: A critical review of techniques, J. Hand Surg. 14A:221 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    G.H. Kraft, Position of function of the wrist, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehab. 53:272 (1972).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Mathiowetz, K. Weber, G. Volland, and N. Kashman, Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations, Hand Surg. 9A:222 (1984).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. Moberg, Objective methods of determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand, J. Bone Joint Surg. 40B:454 (1958).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.R. Napier, The prehensile movements of the human hand, J Bone Joint Surg 38B:902 (1956).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A.C. Nicol, Measurement of joint motion, Clin. Rehabilitation 3:1 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    C.C. Norkin and D.J. White, Measurement of Joint Motion: A Guide to Goniometry, 6nd ed., The F.A. Davis Co., Philadelphia, (1988).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    CG. Phillips, Movements of the Hand, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, (1986).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    J.C. Pryce, The wrist position between neutral and ulnar deviation that facilitates the maximum power grip strength, J. Biomechanics 13:505 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    J.M. Rothstein, P. Miller, and R. Roettger, Goniometrie reliability in a clinical setting: elbow and knee measurements, Phys. Ther. 63:1611 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Scott and S. Marcus, Hand impairment assessment: some suggestions, Applied Ergonomics 22:263 (1991).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Sunderland, Nerves and Nerve Injuries, 2nd ed., Churchill Livingstone, New York (1978).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    R.M. Szabo, R.H. Gelberman, and M.P. Dimick, Sensibility testing in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome, J. Bone Joint Surg. 66A:60 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Tiffin and E.J. Asher, The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and Studies of Reliability and Validity, J. appl Psychol 32:234 (1948).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    G. Westling, and R.S. Johansson, Factors influencing the force control during precision grip, Exp. Brain Res. 53:277 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Louis Thonnard
    • 1
    • 2
  • Léon Plaghki
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dominique Bragard
    • 2
  1. 1.Service de Médecine PhysiqueCliniques Universitaires Saint LucBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Unité READ - Université Catholique de LouvainBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations