X-Ray Stereophotogrammetric Examinations of Flexor Tendon Excursion in the Tendon Sheath Area after Tendon Repair

  • Lars Hagberg
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 256)


A number of early controlled mobilization techniques following direct repair of flexor tendons have been established and described to improve the final results.2,5,6,7,8,9,11,13,18 The efficiency of the different methods are, however, not well documented, controlled clinical studies are rare and there are also negative reports.419 Lane et al.12 found in an experimental study a rapid decrease in tendon gliding occurring within hours of the surgical procedure. They concluded that postoperative hematoma and edema restricted gliding long before collagenous adhesions were synthesized. This may be an explanation to unpredictable results from passive mobilization methods in cases where peroperative tendon gliding were satisfactory. Would then the addition of limited active flexion be necessary in these cases and could that be performed without excessive dehiscence? An investigational method is needed to study the effects of different controlled mobilization techniques on tendon excursion at the level of injury and the gap formation in the tendon repair during the treatment. In this study, Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) has been applied on tendon tissues for clinical studies on movements of flexor profundus tendons during different postoperative treatments.


Flexor Tendon Tendon Sheath Tendon Repair Tendon Tissue Control Mobilization 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Barone, C. Pavaux, P.C. Blin, and P. Cuq, “Atlas of Rabbit Anatomy,” Masson & Cie, Paris (1973).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N.M. Cannon, and J.W. Strickland, Therapy following flexor tendon surgery, Hand Clinics 1:147 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K.W. Cullen, P. Tolhurst, D. Lang, and R.E. Page, Flexor tendon repair in zone II followed by controlled active mobilization, J. Hand Surg. 14B:392 (1989).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Creekmore, H. Bellinghausen, V.L. Young, R.C. Wray, P.M. Weeks, and P. Schindeler Grasse, Comparison of early passive motion and immobilization after flexor tendon repairs, Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 75:75 (1985).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.J. Duran, and R.G. Houser, Controlled passive motion following flexor tendon repair in zones 2 and 3, in: “American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand,” C.V.Mosby Co., St. Louis (1975).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R.J. Duran, R.G. Houser, C.R. Coleman, et al., Management of flexor tendon lacerations in zone 2 using controlled passive motion postoperatively, in: “Rehabilitation of the hand, 2nd ed.,” Hunter, J.M., Schneider, L.H., Mackin, E.J., et al., eds., C.V.Mosby Co., St. Louis (1984).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R.H. Gelberman, D. Amiel, M. Gonsalves, et al., The influence of protected passive mobilization on the healing of flexor tendons: a biomechanical and microangiographic study, Hand 13:120 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.H. Gelberman, S.L. Woo, K. Lothringer, et al., Effects of early intermittent passive mobilization on healing canine flexor tendons, J. Hand Surg. 7:170 (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    R.H. Gelberman, J.S. van de Berg, G.N. Lundborg, and W.H. Akeson, Flexor tendon healing and restoration of the gliding surface; an ultrastructural study in dogs, J. Bone Joint Surg. 65A:70 (1983).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. Hagberg, and G. Selvik, Tendon excursion and dehiscence during early controlled mobilization after flexor tendon repair in zone II: an X-ray stereophotogrammetric analysis, Copyright 1991, by Mosby-Year Book, Inc., J. Hand Surg., 16:4, 669 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    H.E. Kleinert, J.E. Kutz, and M.J. Cohen, Primary repair of zone II flexor tendon lacerations, in: “American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons:Symposium on Tendon Surgery in the Hand,” C.V.Mosby Co., St. Louis (1975).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J.M. Lane, J. Black, and F.W. Bora, Gliding function following flexor-tendon injury; a biomechanical study of rat tendon function, J. Bone Joint Surg. 58:985 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.D. Lister, H.E. Kleinert, J.E. Kutz, et al., Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization, J. Hand Surg. 2:441 (1977).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D.A. McGrouther, and M.R. Ahmed, Flexor tendon excursions in “No man’s land,” Hand 13:129 (1981).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Selvik, P. Alberius, and A.S. Aronson, A roentgen stereophotogrammetric system: construction, calibration and technical accuracy, Acta Radiol. Diagn. 24:343 (1983).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. Selvik, Roentgen stereophotogrammetry; a method for the study of the kinematics of the skeletal system, Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 60:232 (1989).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J.O. Small, M.D. Brennen, and J. Colville, Early active mobilization following flexor tendon repair in zone II, J. Hand Surg. 14B:383 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J.W. Strickland, and S.V. Glogovac, Digital function following flexor tendon repair in Zone II: a comparison of immobilization and controlled passive motion techniques, J. Hand Surg. 5:537 (1980).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Tonkin, L. Hagberg, G. Lister, and J. Kutz, Post-operative management of flexor tendon grafting, J. Hand Surg. 13B:277 (1988).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Hagberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Hand Surgery, Malmö Allmänna SjukhusUniversity of LundMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations