Wrist Range of Motion in Activities of Daily Living

  • David L. Nelson
  • Margaret A. Mitchell
  • Paul G. Groszewski
  • Stephen L. Pennick
  • Paul R. Manske
Chapter
Part of the NATO ASI Series book series (NSSA, volume 256)

Abstract

The wrist motion used to perform activities of daily living (ADL) is important to know when evaluating wrist function after trauma or surgical procedures that limit wrist motion. Several studies have examined wrist motion in terms of absolute range and, more important, functional range. Palmer et al.,10 in the most sophisticated study to date, defined the functional range of the wrist to be 30° of extension, 5° of flexion, 10° of radial deviation, and 15° of ulnar deviation. However, these were mean values, obtained by averaging the data of all subjects in all of the activities; the actual motion requirements of each individual task was therefore obscured, and range was actually underestimated.

Keywords

Wrist Motion Ulnar Deviation Radial Deviation Functional Range Limited Wrist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Joint motion: Method of measuring and recording. Chicago, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (1965).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.C. Boone and S.P. Azen, Normal range of motion of joints in male subjects, J. Bone Joint Surg., 61A:756 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R.H. Brumfield and J.A. Champoux, A biomechanical study of normal functional wrist motion, Clin. Orthop., 187:23 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    R.H. Brumfield, V.L. Nickel, and E. Nickel, Joint motion in wrist flexion and extension, So. Med. J., 59:909 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. Gellman, D. Kauffman, M. Lenihan, M.J. Botte, and A. Sarmiento, An in vitro analysis of wrist motion: The effect of limited intercarpal arthrodesis and the contributions of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints, J. Hand Surg., 13A:378 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.C. Hume, H.G. Gellman, H. McKellop, and R.H. Brumfield, Functional range of motion of the joints of the hand, J. Hand Surg., 15A:240 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    S.E. Logan and P. Groszewski, Dynamic wrist motion analysis using six degree of freedom sensors, Biomed. Sci. Instrumentation 25: (1989).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.M. Meyerdierks, J.F. Mosher, and F.W. Werner, Limited wrist arthrodesis: A laboratory study. J. Hand Surg., 12A:526 (1987).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Minami, T. Ogino, and M. Minami, Limited wrist fusions, J. Hand Surg., 13A:660 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A.K. Palmer, F.W. Werner, D. Murphy, and R. Glisson, Functional wrist motion: A biomechanical study, J. Hand Surg. 10A:39 (1985).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.L. Porter and I. Stockley, Functional index: A numerical expression of post-traumatic wrist function, Injury, 16:188 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P.M. Rozing and J.M.G. Kauer, Partial arthrodesis of the wrist: An investigation in cadavers, Acta Orthop. Scand., 55:66 (1984).PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.H. Sarrafian, J.L. Melamed, and G.M. Goshgarian, Study of wrist motion in flexion and extension, Clin. Orthop., 126:153 (1977).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    T. Trumble, C.J. Bour, R.J. Smith, and G.S. Edwards, Intercarpal arthrodesis for static and dynamic olar intercalated segment instability, J. Hand Surg., 13A:384 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Nelson
    • 1
  • Margaret A. Mitchell
    • 2
  • Paul G. Groszewski
    • 2
  • Stephen L. Pennick
    • 2
  • Paul R. Manske
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of California, San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Program in Occupational TherapyWashington UniversitySt LouisUSA
  3. 3.Division of Orthopedic SurgeryWashington UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations