Spatio-Temporal Source Estimation of Evoked Potentials by Wavelet-Type Decomposition

Wavelet-Type Source Estimation of EPs
  • Amir B. Geva
  • Hillel Pratt
  • Yehoshua Y. Zeevi


Scalp recording of electrical events allows evaluation of human cerebral function, but contributions of the specific brain structures generating the recorded activity are ambiguous. This problem is ill-posed and cannot be solved without auxiliary physiological knowledge about the spatio-temporal characteristics of the generators’ activity. The widely-used model to describe the evoked potentials’ sources is a set of current dipoles. It does not include a temporal model of source activity and does not propose a solution of the number of sources that are active simultaneously nor how to differentiate their contributions.

In our multichannel wavelet-type decomposition, scalp recorded signals are decomposed into a combination of physiologically-based wavelets. The coherent activity of a population of neurons may be derived by convolving a single cell’s electrical contribution with the population’s Gaussian temporal distribution of activity. Thus, we chose the Hermite Functions (derived from the Gaussian function to form mono-, bi- and tri-phasic waveforms) as the mathematical model to describe the temporal pattern of mass neural activity.

For each wavelet we solve the inverse problem for two symmerically positioned and oriented dipoles, one of which attains zero magnitude when a single source is more suitable. We use the wavelet to model the temporal activity pattern of the symmetrical dipoles. By this we reduce the dimension of inverse problem and find a plausible solution. Once the number and the initial parameters of the sources are given, we can apply multiple source estimation to correct the solution for generators with overlapping activity.

Application of the procedure to subcortical and cortical components of short-latency visual evoked potentials (SVEP) in response to high-intensity, strobe flashes, demonstrates its feasibility.


Mother Wavelet Residual Signal Hermite Function Current Dipole Source Estimation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Achim. A., Richer, F.. Saint-Hilaire, J.M.,1991, Methodological considerations for the evaluation of Spatio-Temporal Source Models (STAM). Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 79: 227–240.Google Scholar
  2. Allison. G., Goff. W. R.. Williamson, P.D.. and Van Gilder. J. C., 1980, On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential. In Desmedt J.E. (ed.): Clinical Uses of Cerebral. Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology.Google Scholar
  3. Basel, Karger. 7: 51-68. Daubechies. L, 1988, Orthogonal bases of compactly supported wavelets, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 41: 909-996.Google Scholar
  4. Donchin, E., 1980, Event-related brain potentials: a tool in the study of human information processing. In: Begleiter H. (ed.) Evoked Potentials in Psychiatry. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Duffy, F. H.. 1982, Topographic display of evoked potentials: clinical applications of brain electrical activity mapping (BEAM) evoked potentials, Ann. NY.Acad. Sci. 388: 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fender, D. H.. 1987, Source localization of brain electrical activity. In: Gevins, A. S, and Remond, A. (eds.), Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Handbook of Electroencephalographv and Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Vol. 1, 13: 355–403.Google Scholar
  7. Gath, I.. and Geva, A. B., 1989. Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 7: 773–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Genossar, T., and Porat, M., 1992, Optimal bi-orthonormal approximation of signals. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 22 (3): 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Geva, A. B., Pratt H., and Zeevi Y. Y., 1993, WaveletDecomposition of multichannel evoked potential s, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 87: S25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Geva, A. B., Pratt, H., 1994, Unsupervised clustering of evoked potentials by waveform, Med. & Biol. Eng. & Comput. 32: 543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geva. A. B., Pratt. H., and Zeevi, Y Y., 1995, Spatio-temporal multiple source localization by wavelet-type decomposition of evoked potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. In press.Google Scholar
  12. Lehmann. D., 1987, Principles of spatial analysis. In: Gevins,A. S, and Remond. A. (eds.), Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Handbook of Electroencephalographv and Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier: Amsterdam, vol. 1, 12: 309–354.Google Scholar
  13. Mallat, S. Ci., 1989, A theory for multiresolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation, IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11:674-693.Google Scholar
  14. McGillem, C. D., and Aunon, J. L, 1987, Analysis of event-related potentials. In: Gevins, A. S.. and Remond, A. (eds.), Methods and Analysis ofBrain Electrical and Magnetic Signals. Handbook ofElectroencephalographv and Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier: Amsterdam. vol. 1, 5. 131- I 69.Google Scholar
  15. Moller, A. R., Jannetta, P. J., and Jho, H. D., 1990, Recordings from human dorsal column nuclei using stimulation of the lower limb, Neurosurgery 26: 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Morioka, T., Shima, F., Kato, M., and Fukui, M., 1991, Direct recording of somatosensory evoked potentials in the vicinity of the dorsal column nuclei in man: their generator mechanisms and contribution to the scalp far-field potentials, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 80: 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morton, J., Marcus, S., and Frankish, C., 1976, Perceptual centers (P-centers), Psychol. Rev. 83: 405–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mosher, J. C., Lewis, P. S., and Leahy, R. M., 1992, Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data, IEEE Trans. on Biomed. Eng. 39: 541–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nunez, P.L., 1981, Electric Fields of the Brain. The Neurophysics ofEEG. Oxford: New York.Google Scholar
  20. Papakostopolous, D. A., and Crow, H. J., 1980, Direct recording of the somatosensory evoked potentials from the cerebral cortex of man and the difference between precentral and postcentral potentials. In Desmedt, J.E. (ed.): Clinical Uses of Cerebral, Brainstem and Spinal Somatosensory Evoked Potentials. Progress in Clinical Neurophysiology. Karger:Basel, 7: 15–26.Google Scholar
  21. Plonsey, R., and Fleming, D. G., 1969, Bioelectric Phenomena. McGraw-Hill: New York. 5: 203-275.Google Scholar
  22. Porat, M., and Zeevi, Y. Y., 1988, The generalized Gabor scheme of image representation in biological and machine vision, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intel. 10: 452–468.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pratt, H., Michalewski, H. J., Barrett, G., and Starr, A., 1989, Brain potentials in a memory-scanning task: I. Modality and task effects on potentials to probes, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72: 407–42 I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratt, H.. Martin, W. H., Bleich, N., Zaaroor, M., and Schacham, S. E., 1994, A high intensity, goggle-mounted flash stimulator for short latency visual evoked potentials. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 92: 469–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Regan, D., 1989, Human Brain Electrophysiology. Evoked Potentials und Evoked Magnetic Fields in Science and Medicine. Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  26. Rioul, O., and Duhamel, P., 1992. Fast algorithms for discrete and continuous wavelet transforms, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory 1T38: 569–586.Google Scholar
  27. Scherg, M.. and von Cramon. D., 1985. A new interpretation of the generators of BAEP waves I-V. Results of spatio-temporal dipole model, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory IT62: 290–299.Google Scholar
  28. Slimp. J. C., Minas, L. B., Stolov, W. C., and Wyler, A. R., 1985. Somatosensory evoked potentials after removal of somatosensory cortex. Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 37: 663–669.Google Scholar
  29. Tichonov, A. N., and Arsenin, V. Y., 1977, Solution of Ill-Posed Problems. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
  30. Urasaki, E., Wada, S., Kadoya, C., Yokota, A., Matsuoka, S., and Shima, F.,1990, Origin of scalp far-field NJ 8 of SSEPs in response to median nerve stimulation, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 77:39-5 I.Google Scholar
  31. Urasaki, E., Uematsu, S., and Lesser, R. P., 1993, Short latency somatosensory evoked potentials recorded around the human upper brainstem, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol. 88:92-104.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir B. Geva
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hillel Pratt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yehoshua Y. Zeevi
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Technion — Israel Institute of TechnologyIsrael
  2. 2.Behavioral Biology, Gutwirth BldgEvoked Potentials LaboratoryIsrael
  3. 3.Departments of Electrical and Biomedical EngineeringHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations