Deuteron Formation in Expanding Nuclear Matter from a Strong Coupling BCS Approach

  • M. Baldo
  • J. Dukelsky
  • F. Gulminelli
  • U. Lombardo
  • P. Schuck


Central heavy ion collisions at E/A in the 50 to 200 MeV range can roughly be described by the initial build up of compressed and hot nuclear matter and by a sequential decompression. Some of these reactions have recently been reported [1] to end up with final fragments not heavier than α-particles, at most. This is the kind of scenario we shall address in this work. Our main aim is to develop the first steps of a transport theory which goes beyond BUU in a systematic fashion to include light cluster formation in a consistent way. By the latter we mean that cluster formation is followed throughout the entire reaction process without any ad hoc switching on and off of clustering or coalescence processes. In such a way for example memory effects in the formation process and Pauli principle will be fully accounted for. We here shall be mainly concerned with deuteron formation. However, in the end we shall shortly touch upon α-particle production as well. Our theoretical tools will be based on BCS and quasi-particle RPA theory.


Nuclear Matter Cooper Pair Symmetric Nuclear Matter Single Particle Density Time Dependent Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Indra Collaboration, Onset of vaporization for the Ar+Ni system, Phys. Lett. 353B: 27 (1995).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Baldo, U. Lombardo and P. Schuck, Deuteron formation in expanding nuclear matter from a strong coupling BCS approach, Phys. Rev. 52C:975 (1995) and M. Baldo, J. Dukelsky, F. Gulminelli, U. Lombardo and P. Schuck, Contribution to the Predeal International Summer School “Collective Motion and Nuclear Dynamics”, Predeal (Roumania), to be published in World Scientific (1995).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka, “Quantum Theory of Many Particle Systems,” McGraw-Hill Pub. Co. (1971).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. W. Serene and D. Rainer, The quasiclassical approach to superfluid 3He, Phys.Rep. 101: 221 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    F. Gulminelli and P. Schuck, in preparation.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Reinhardt and H. Schulz, Illustration of the semiclassical theory of large amplitude collective excitations and fission by means of a schematic model, Nucl. Phys. 391A: 36 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Vollhardt, P. Wolfle, Transport properties, in “the Superfluid Phases of Helium 3,” Taylor and Francis editors, (1982).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kohl, P. Schuck and S. Stringari, Phase space description of collective nuclear vibrations with the Vlasov equation plus quantum corrections, Nucl. Phys. 459A: 265 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Dukelsky and P. Schuck, Towards a variational theory for RPA like correlations and fluctu- ations, Nucl. Phys. 512A:466 (1990) and Variational RPA for the anharmonic oscillator, Mod. Phys. Lett. 26A: 2429 (1991).ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. P. Krüger, P. Schuck, On an analytic expression for the one magnon dispersion relation in a Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Europhys. Lett. 27: 395 (1994).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 10.
    H. M. Sommermann, Microscopic description of giant resonances in highly excited nuclei, Ann. Phys. 151: 163 (1983).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 11.
    J. Dukelsky and P. Schuck, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Baldo
    • 1
  • J. Dukelsky
    • 2
  • F. Gulminelli
    • 3
  • U. Lombardo
    • 1
    • 4
  • P. Schuck
    • 5
  1. 1.INFNCataniaItaly
  2. 2.IEMMadridSpain
  3. 3.LPCCaen CedexFrance
  4. 4.Università di CataniaCataniaItaly
  5. 5.ISNGrenoble CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations