Abstract
Three-dimensional (3D) digitization of biological specimens overcomes many of the problems of specimen registration attendant when using “standard” two-dimensional views or projections. External surfaces can be digitized directly by hand with electromagnetic, laser-light, sound, servo-mechanism and stereophotogrammetric devices, which are reviewed here. Single-point source laser-light devices are generally the most precise. Data may be captured directly from external or internal surfaces as adjoining tomographic slices (e.g., microscope; CT, and MR not reviewed here). The resulting stack of slices may be used to produce an isosurface image. There are a great many visualization environments available, some of which are briefly described, that facilitate the construction of isosurface images and measurement collection from Three-dimensional images. Three-dimensional models of Three-Dimensional image data are usually “printed” in plastic via a variety of new technologies briefly summarized.
The next great surge in morphometrics will involve the superb new technology of high-speed workstations. (Bookstein, 1991)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bookstein, F. L. 1991 Morphometric tools for landmark data: Geometry and biology. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
Coatrieux J. L. and C. Barillot 1990 A survey of 3D display techniques to render medical data. Pages 175–195 in K. H. Hoëhne, H. Fuchs, S. M. Pizer, (eds.) 3D imaging in medicine. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
Corner, B. D., S. Lele, and J. T. Richtsmeier. 1992. Measurement error of 3D landmark data. Quantitative Anthropology 3: 347–359.
Corner, B., and J. T. Richtsmeier 1992 Cranial growth in the Squirrel monkey (Saimuri sciureus): A quantitative analysis using 3D coordinate data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 87: 67–81.
Cutting, C. B., J. G. McCarthy, and D. B. Karron. 1988. 3D input of body surface data using a laser light scanner. Annals of Plastic Surgery 21: 38–45.
Fruhauf, M. 1991. Volume visualization on workstations: Image quality and efficiency of different techniques. Comput. and Graphics 15: 101–107.
Jacobs, P. 1993. Stereolithography: From art to part. Cutting Tool Engineering 45: l-3.
Kalvin A. D. 1991. Segmentation and surface-based modeling of objects in 3D biomedical images. Ph.D. dissertation: New York University.
Kalvin, A. D., C. B. Cutting, B. Haddad, and M. Noz. 1991. Constructing topologically connected surfaces for the comprehensive analysis of 3D medical structures. SPIE 1445: 247–258.
Kalvin A. D., D. Dean, J.-J. Hublin, and M. Braun. 1992. Visualization in anthropology: Reconstruction of human fossils from multiple pieces. Pages. 404–420 in A. E. Kaufman and G. M. Nielson, (eds.). Proceedings of IEEE Visualization ‘82.
Krieg, J. C., H. R. Jones, A. G. Rodgers, and M. R. Schneider. 1992. A 4 millisecond, low latency, 120 Hz, electromagnetic tracker for virtual reality applications. Internal Application Note, Polhemus.
Lele, S., and J. T. Richtsmeier. 1992. On comparing biological shapes: Detection of influential landmarks. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 87: 49–65.
MacLarnon, A. M. 1989. Applications of the Reflex instruments in quantitative morphology. Folia Primatologica 53: 33–49.
Magnusson, M., R. Lenz, and P. E. Danielsson. 1991. Evaluation of methods for shaded surface display of CT volumes. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 15: 247–256.
Raab, F. H., E. B. Blod, T. O. Steiner, and H. R. Jones 1979 Magnetic position and orientation tracking system. IEEE Trans. Aerospace and Elec. Sys. 15: 709–718.
Richtsmeier, J. T., and A. Walker 1993. A morphometric study of facial growth. Pages 391–410 in A Walker and R Leakey (eds.), The Nariokotome Homo erectus skeleton. Harvard University Press: Cambridge.
Robb, A. R., and D. P. Hanson. 1991. A software system for interactive and quantitative visualization of multidimensional biomedical images. Austral. Phys. and Eng. Sci. in Med. 14: 9–30.
Rogowitz, B. E., and L. A. Treinish. 1993. An architecture for rule-based visualization. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization `93: 236–234.
Sandeman, D. R., N. Patel, C. Chandler, R. J. Nelson, H. B. Coakham, and H. B. Griffith. 1992. Advances in image directed neurosurgery: Preliminary experience with the ISG Viewing Wand compared with the Leksell G frame. Clinical MRI 2: 91–92.
Udupa, J. K., and D. Odhner. 1993. Shell rendering. IEEE Comp. Graphics and Applic. 27: 58–67.
Udupa, J. K., K. I. Goncalves, D. Narendula, D. Odhner, S. Samarasekera, and S. Sharma. 1993.3DVIEWNIX: An open, transportable software system for the visualization and analysis of multidimensional, multimodality, multiparametric images. SPIE 1897: 47–58.
Vannier, M. W., and G. C. Conroy. 1989. Imaging workstations for computer-aided primatology: Promises and pitfalls. Folia Primatologica 53: 7–21.
Vinarub, E. I., and N. Kapoor. 1992. 3D digitizing hidden surface using borescopic sensor technology. Proc. App. Machine Vision Conf. ‘82: MS92 160: 1–11.
Wohlers, T. T. 1992. 3D Digitizers. Computer Graphics World 2: 73–77.
Zinreich, J. S., S. A. Tebo, D. M. Long, H. Brem, D. E. Mattox, M. E. Loury, C. A. Vander Kolk, W. M. Koch, D. W. Kennedy, and R. N. Bryan. 1993. Frameless stereotaxic integration of CT imaging data: Accuracy and initial applications. Radiology 188: 735–742.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dean, D. (1996). Three-Dimensional Data Capture and Visualization. In: Marcus, L.F., Corti, M., Loy, A., Naylor, G.J.P., Slice, D.E. (eds) Advances in Morphometrics. NATO ASI Series, vol 284. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9083-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4757-9085-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-9083-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive