Advertisement

Characterization of Simulated Production Welds in Alloy 908

  • C. H. Jang
  • D. C. Grundy
  • R. G. Ballinger
  • M. M. Steeves
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)

Abstract

This study characterized room temperature mechanical properties of Incoloy® alloy 908* welds made from two base metal conditions: mill-annealed or homogenized (1050°C/1hr). An automatic pulsed-gas tungsten arc welder simulated actual conduit welding conditions.

The weld fusion zone showed a typical cellular-dendritic microstructure with the precipitation of secondary phases within the interdendritic zone. Grain boundary liquation phenomenon was observed near the fusion boundaries in the heat affected zone. Complete resolidification of liquated grain boundaries prevented crack formation during welding.

The tensile properties of the welds showed a strong dependence on the selection of the base metal used for welding. When the base metal was homogenized, the welds showed about the same amount of ductility as the homogenized base metal in the as-welded condition. Its strength was also higher than that of the surrounding homogenized base metal. The fracture toughness of welds was measured by the J-integral test technique. Unlike the tensile properties, the fracture toughness of the welds showed no dependence on the condition of the base metal. The fracture toughness of the welds was about 140 MPa√m in the aged condition. The fatigue crack growth rates of aged production welds were comparable to those of the base metal. The fatigue crack growth threshold was measured to be about 3.7 MPa√m for the as-welded production welds with homogenized base metal.

Keywords

Fracture Toughness Base Metal Fatigue Crack Growth Fusion Zone Heat Affected Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    D.B. Montgomery, “Preliminary Description of ITER Magnet-Drawing Package,” Trip report to ITER R&D meeting at JET, (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C.H. Jang, I.S. Hwang, R.G. Ballinger and M.M. Steeves, Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat. 40: 1323 (1994).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    C.H. Jang, Ph.D Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1995).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D.J. O’lone, M.S. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, (1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    I.S. Hwang, R.G. Ballinger and C.H. Jang, “Properties of Incoloy 908,” Workshop on structural materials R&D for ITER, Boulder, (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C.H. Jang, “Alloy 908 Weld Characterization,” U.S. ITER Incoloy 908 workshop, Pacific Grove, (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M.M. Steeves, private communication (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J.T. Salkin, “Development of Welding Procedure for Incoloy 908 Superconductor Sheathing”, Job report prepared for Inco Alloys International, Inc., by Arc Application Inc., (1994).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.T. Salkin, “Incoloy 908 Test Plates Welded with the Simulated Procedure for Square Sheathing”, Job report prepared for Massachusetts Institute of Technology, by Arc Application Inc., (June 1994).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.T. Salkin, “Incoloy 908 Test Plates Welded with the Simulated GTA Procedure for Square Sheathing”, Job Report Prepared for Massachusetts Institute Technology, by Arc Application Inc., (Sept. 1994).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM Standard E 8–86, “Standard Methods of Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.”Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ASTM Standard E 647–93, “Standard Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates.”Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    W.A. Herman, R.W. Hertzberg, C.H. Newton and R. Jaccard, “Fatigue 87”, R.O. Ritchie and E.A. Starke, Jr. eds., Engineering Materials Advisory Services Ltd., (1987), p. 819.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    R.L. Tobler and I.S. Hwang, Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat. 40: 1315 (1994).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASTM Standard E 813–89, “Standard Test Method for JIc, A Measure of Fracture Toughness.”Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM Standard E 1152–87, “Standard Test Method for Determining J-R Curves.”Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.C. Ernst, W.A. Baeslack III and J.C. Lippold, Welding Journal, p. 418s-430s, (Oct. 1989)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    B. Radhkrishnan and R.G. Thompson, Met. Trans. 24A: 1409, (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W.A. Owczarski, “Physical Metallurgy of Metal Joining,” R. Kossowsky and M.E. Glicksman des., The Metallurgical Society of AIME, (1979), p. 166.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    R. Nakkalil, N.L. Richards and M.C. Chaturvedi, Met. Trans.24A: 1169 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. H. Jang
    • 1
  • D. C. Grundy
    • 1
  • R. G. Ballinger
    • 2
  • M. M. Steeves
    • 1
  1. 1.Plasma Fusion CenterMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Nuclear Engineering and Materials Science and EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations