Fatigue Tests and Life Estimation of Incoloy Alloy 908

  • J. Feng
  • L. S. Toma
  • C. H. Jang
  • M. M. Steeves
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)


Incoloy® alloy 908* is a candidate conduit material for Nb3Sn cable-in-conduit superconductors. The conduit is expected to experience cyclic loads at 4 K. Fatigue fracture of the conduit is one possible failure mode. So far, fatigue life has been estimated from fatigue crack growth data, which provide conservative results. The more traditional practice of life estimation using S-N curves has not been done for alloy 908 due to a lack of data at room and cryogenic temperatures. This paper presents a series of fatigue test results in response to this need. Tests were performed in reversed bending, rotating bending, and uniaxial fatigue machines. The test matrix included different heat treatments, two load ratios (R=-1 and 0.1), two temperatures (298 and 77 K), and two orientations (longitudinal and transverse). As expected, there is a semi-log linear relation between the applied stress and fatigue life above an applied stress (e.g., 310 MPa for tests at 298 K and R=-1). Below this stress the curves show an endurance limit. The aged and cold-worked materials have longer fatigue lives and higher endurance limits than the others. Different orientations have no apparent effect on life. Cryogenic temperature results in a much high fatigue life than room temperature. A higher tensile mean stress gives shorter fatigue life. It was also found that the fatigue lives of the reversed bending specimens were of the same order as those of the uniaxial test specimens, but were only half the lives of the rotating bending specimens for given stresses. A sample application of the S-N data is discussed.


Fatigue Crack Fatigue Life Load Ratio Endurance Limit Fatigue Crack Initiation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L.S. Toma, M.M. Steeves and R.P. Reed, “Incoloy Alloy 908 Data Handbook,” PFC/RR-94–2, PFC, MIT, Cambridge (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    M.M. Morra and R.G. Ballinger et al., Incoloy 9XA, a new low coefficient of thermal expansion sheathing alloy for use in ICCS magnets, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering (Materials),” Vol. 34 (1987), p. 157.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Feng and F.A. McClintock et al., Evaluation of conductors and design criteria development for the central solenoid of the Compact Ignition Tokamak (CIT), in: “Fusion Technology,” Vol. 19 (1991), p. 1177.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Suresh, “Fatigue of Materials,” Cambridge University Press, New York (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.O. Fuchs and R.I. Stephens, “Metal Fatigue in Engineering,” John Wiley & Sons, New York (1980).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    M.W. Brown and K.J. Miller, Two decades of progress in the assessment of multiaxial low cycle fatigue life, in: “Low-Cycle Fatigue and Life Prediction,” ASTM STP 770, ASTM (1982), p. 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Broek, “Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics,” Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Nyilas and J. Zhang et al., Fatigue and fatigue crack growth properties of 316LN and Incoloy 908 below 10 K, in: “Advances in Cryogenic Engineering (Materials),” Vol. 38 (1992), p. 133.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Feng and M.M. Steeves, “CS Model Coil, Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Incoloy Alloy 908 Conduits,” PFC/RR-95–4, PFC, MIT (1995).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F.A. McClintock, J. Feng and R.F. Vieira, Using statistical and uncertainty analyses in design, applied to a tokamak central solenoid, in: “IEEE Conf. Proc., 14th Symposium on Fusion Engineering,” Vol. 2 (1991), p. 872.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Feng
    • 1
  • L. S. Toma
    • 1
  • C. H. Jang
    • 1
  • M. M. Steeves
    • 1
  1. 1.Plasma Fusion CenterMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations