Contact Surfaces between Strands of Rutherford Cables in Various Curing Conditions

  • A. Kimura
  • T. Shintomi
  • A. Terashima
  • S. Kawabata
  • F. Sumiyoshi
  • H. Hirabayashi
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)


Interstrand AC losses and contact resistances of Rutherford cables are easily affected by curing conditions. We have measured the interstrand AC losses and contact resistances for three kinds of Rutherford cables, made from strands with a Cu matrix, a CuMn barrier around a filamentary bundle and a CuMn matrix inside a Cu sheath. The losses of all the cables were relatively large, if there was no release of pressure after curing. They were significantly reduced after releasing the pressure at a room temperature except for the cable with a Cu matrix at a high curing temperature. The measured contact resistances show the same dependencies. Strands of the cable with a Cu matrix were bonded at crossover points by curing at higher temperature, and bonded crossover points were not broken when pressure is released after curing. We have also observed contact surfaces of the strands by using a Scanning Electron Microscope, and found that there were traces of diffusion bonding on the contact surfaces. The fact that the other cables show smaller AC losses by releasing pressure can be explained by the mechanical properties of the matrix materials.


Contact Resistance Crossover Point Diffusion Bonding Diffusion Welding High Energy Accelerator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Delchamps et al., “AC Loss Measurement of SSC Dipole Magnets,” Proceedings of the ICFA Workshop on AC Superconductivity, Tsukuba, (1992) pp. 19.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. H. Morgan, “Eddy Currents in Flat Metal-filled Superconducting Braids,” J. Appl. Phys., 44: 3319 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Polak, et al., “Losses in 23 Strands NbTi and Nt3Sn Flat Cables,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 17: 2035 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Wake et al., “AC Loss in Energy Doubler Magnets,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 15: 141 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. E. Sytnikov et al., “Coupling Losses in Superconducting Transposed Conductors Located in Changing Magnetic Field,” Cryogenics, 29: 926 (1889).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. P. Verweij and H. H. J. ten Kate, “Coupling Currents in Rutherford Cables under Time Varying Conditions,” IEEE Trans. Applied Superconductivity, 3: 146 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Y. Lei et al., “Study on Interstrand Coupling Losses in Rutherford-type Superconducting Cables,” KEK report, 92–18(1993).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Kimura et al., “Influence of Curing on AC Losses of Cables for Superconducting Accelerator Magnets,” IEEE Trans. Magn., 30: 2515 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Kimura et al., “Stabilities of the Rutherford Cables with Cu Matrix and CuMn Barrier,” to be published in IEEE Trans. Applied Superconductivity (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    O. Ohashi, private communicationsGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Kimura et al., to be published in Cryogenics.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. G. Collings et al., “Magnetic Studies of AC Loss in Pressurized Rutherford Cables with Coated Strands and Resistive Cores,” this conferenceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Kimura
    • 1
  • T. Shintomi
    • 2
  • A. Terashima
    • 2
  • S. Kawabata
    • 3
  • F. Sumiyoshi
    • 3
  • H. Hirabayashi
    • 4
  1. 1.The Graduated University for Advanced StudiesTsukuba, Ibaraki, 305Japan
  2. 2.National Laboratory for High Energy PhysicsTsukuba, Ibaraki, 305Japan
  3. 3.Kagoshima UniversityKagoshima, 890Japan
  4. 4.National Institute for Fusion ResearchNagoya, AichiJapan

Personalised recommendations