Coupling Loss Time Constants in Full-Size Nb3Sn CIC Model Conductors for Fusion Magnets

  • A. Nijhuis
  • H. H. J. ten Kate
  • J. L. Duchateau
  • P. Bruzzone
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)


The cable-in-conduit conductor for the ITER coils have to perform at magnetic fields up to 13 T under the conditions of normal high ramp rates as well as extreme magnetic pulses during a plasma disruption. Modelling, ac loss computations and design optimisations require to understand and identify the coupling loss time constants in multistage cables. For this AC loss measurements are performed on jacketed full size Nb3Sn cable-in-conduit conductors. A transverse sinusoidal magnetic field is applied on the conductor to determine the coupling loss time constants with a calorimetric method. Moreover the decay of the coupling currents after a linear ramp is monitored with compensated pick-up coils. A comparison is made between the results obtained with both measuring methods. It appears that the n.τ value taken from the slope of the loss versus frequency curve in the low frequency limit has only a meaning at these low frequencies. At higher rates of magnetic field which are relevant to describe a plasma disruption, internal shielding effects are not negligible and a different approach has to be used. The experimental results and a straightforward model are presented to find the coupling current time constants of this type of conductors. It is shown that several dominant time constants can exist that are associated with relatively small volume fractions of a cable.


Void Fraction Small Volume Fraction Coupling Loss Linear Ramp Plasma Disruption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A.M. Campbell, “A general Treatment of Losses in Multifilamentary Superconductors,” Cryogenics, Vol.: 22, 1982, pp. 3–16 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J.L. Duchateau, B. Turck, and D. Ciazynski, “Coupling Current Losses in Composites and Cables,” Note PEM 93–23, Chapitre 3 du projet européen COMETT, Cadarache, July 1993.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D. Ciazynski, B. Turck, J.L. Duchateau, and C. Meuris, “AC Losses and Current Distribution in 40 kA NbTi and Nb3Sn Conductors for NET/ITER,” IEEE Transitions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol.: 3, No.: 1, March 1993, pp. 594–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    D. Ter Avest, “Properties of the Superconductor in Accelerator Dipole Magnets,” Thesis University of Twente, ISBN 90–9004244-X, June, 1991.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Bruzzone, L. Bottura, J. Eikelboom, and A.J.M. Roovers, “AC Losses for the Prototype Cable-in-Conduit Conductors for NET,” IEEE Transitions on Magnetics, Vol.: 28, No.: 1, January 1992, pp. 194–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Bruzzese, S. Ceresara, S. Chiarelli, A. Delia Corte, P. Gislon, T. Pietrobon, S. Rossi, and M. Spadoni, “The Cable-in Conduit Nb3Sn Conductor for the EURATOM-ENEA 12 T Wind and React Magnet,” IEEE Transitions on Applied Superconductivity, Vol.: 3, No.: 1, March 1993, pp. 515–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Nijhuis, H.H.J ten Kate, P. Bruzzone, and L. Bottura, “Parametric Study on Coupling Loss in Subsize ITER Nb3Sn Cabled Specimen,” paper presented at MT-14, Tampere, Finland, June 14, 1995.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Krempasky and C. Schmidt, “Theoretical Analysis of Time Constant Measurements of Technical Superconductors,” IEEE Transitions on Magnetics, Vol.: 30, No.: 4, July 1994, pp. 2654–2657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. Krempasky and C. Schmidt, “Frequency Behaviour of Phase Shift Between Magnetisation and External AC Field in Technical Superconductors,” Cryogenics, Vol.: 34, Supplement, June 1994.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Nijhuis
    • 1
  • H. H. J. ten Kate
    • 1
  • J. L. Duchateau
    • 2
  • P. Bruzzone
    • 3
  1. 1.Low Temperature DivisionUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Association EURATOM-CEACadaracheFrance
  3. 3.ITER/NET teamMax-Planck InstitutGarchingGerma+ny

Personalised recommendations