Current-Voltage Characteristics of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ in the C-Axis Direction

  • J. Takeya
  • S. Akita
  • J. Shimoyama
  • K. Kishio
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering Materials book series (ACRE, volume 42)


Current-voltage (I-V) characteristics of Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ single crystals were measured in the c-axis direction as a function of temperature and magnetic field parallel to the current. In order to eliminate heating effect, a voltage pulse with a width of 0.5 – 1 μs was applied for each I-V point. We found an ohmic region far below the gap voltage. The ohmic resistance increased with decreasing temperature and grew 30 times larger at 4.2 K than that at room temperature. Magnetic field strongly suppressed the critical current but did not change this ohmic resistance. These behaviors can be explained by a semiconductive shunt resistance connected in parallel to a stack of Josephson junctions. By applying two-step voltage pulses, we observed a hysteretic feature of the intrinsic Josephson junctions. Crystals with different oxygen contents showed a large variation in critical current, normal resistance, the shunt resistance at low temperature and the degree of hysteresis due to a difference in anisotropy ratios. Utilizing the bistability revealed by the hysteretic feature, the Bi2212 crystal can function as a switching device in the c-direction. A natural stack of many junctions will exhibit large response voltage, which is a great advantage for application to power devices.


Contact Resistance Josephson Junction Anisotropy Ratio Response Voltage Shunt Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R. Kleiner, F. Steinmeyer, G. Kunkel, and P. Müller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68: 2394 (1992);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 1a.
    R. Kleiner and P. Müller, Phys. Rev. B 49: 1327 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    J. R. Clem, Phys. Rev. B 43: 7837 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    K. E. Gray and D. H. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70: 1693 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    Y. Kotaka, T. Kimura, H. Ikuta, J. Shimoyama, K. Kitazawa, K. Kishio, and D. Pooke, Physica C235–240: 1529 (1994).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    S. Martin, A. T. Fiory, R. M. Fleming, G. P. Espinoza, and A. S. Cooper, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54:72 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    J. Takeya and S. Akita, Phys. Rev. B 50: 16747 (1994);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 6a.
    J. Takeya and S. Akita, Physica C 235–240: 3287 (1994). We pointed out the possibility of nonequilibrium effect by large current injection. However, our previous I-V curve measured by the de method seems better understood on the basis of self-heating, since the VII vs. I×V curve replotted from the I-V curve is similar to the R-T curve of the same sample. Although we measured the temperature using our special thermometer to check the degree of heating, we may not have measured the actual sample temperature due to heat diffusion.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 7.
    N. Motohira, K. Kuwahara, T. Hasegawa, K. Kishio, and K. Kitazawa, J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn.Int. Ed., 97:944 (1989).Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    A. Junod, K.-Q. Wang, T. Tsukamoto, G. Triscone, B. Revaz, E. Walker, and J. Müller, Physica C 229: 209 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 9.
    T. Hasegawa, H. Ikuta and K. Kitazawa, Tunneling spectroscopy of oxide superconductors in: “Physical Properties of High Temperature Superconductors”, D. M. Ginsberg, ed., World Sci. Pub. Co., Singapore, (1994), Vol. 3, p. 525.Google Scholar
  12. 10.
    M. F. Crommie and A. Zettl, Phys. Rev. B 43: 408 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 11.
    E. L. Hu, L. D. Jackel, A. R. Strnad, R. W. Epworth, R. F. Lucey, C. A. Zogg, and E. Gornik, Appl. Phys. Lett. 32: 584 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 12.
    L. L. Daemon, L. N. Bulaevskii, M. P. Maley, and J. Y. Coulter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70: 1693 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    M. J. Graf, D. Rainer, and J. A. Sauls, Phys. Rev. B 47: 12089 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 14.
    F-X. Regi, J. Schneck, J-F. Palmier, P. Müller and H. Savary, Physica C 235–240: 3293 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    K. K. Likharev, in “Dynamics of Josephson Junctions and Circuits” Gordon and Breach Sci. Pub. Co., Philadelphia (1986).Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    The critical current of our sample may be smaller than that of a small Josephson junction compared to Josephson penetration depth, λ J . However, we calculated this size effect as at most two times, which is not significant in our rough estimate of the specific capacitance. This is mainly because λ J . itself is inversely proportional to I C . Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    A. Yurgens, D. Winkler, Z. M. Zhang, N. V. Zavaritsky, and T. Claeson, Physica C 235–240: 3269 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Takeya
    • 1
  • S. Akita
    • 1
  • J. Shimoyama
    • 2
  • K. Kishio
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Research Institute of Electric Power IndustryKomae-shi, Tokyo, 201Japan
  2. 2.The University of TokyoBunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113Japan

Personalised recommendations