AC Loss and Contact Resistance in Nb3Sn Rutherford Cables With and Without a Stainless Steel Core

  • M. D. Sumption
  • E. W. Collings
  • R. M. Scanlan
  • A. Nijhuis
  • H. H. J. ten Kate
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 44)

Abstract

Calorimetric measurements of AC loss and hence interstrand contact resistance (IRC), were measured on two types of Rutherford cable wound with unplated Nb3Sn strand. One of the cable types was furnished with a thin core of AISI 316L stainless steel and the other was left uncored. The cables were subjected to pressures of 5, 10, and 20 MPa, respectively, during reaction heat treatment (RHT), and to 100 MPa during measurement. AC loss was measured at 4.2 K in sinusoidal fields of amplitudes 200 and 400 mT at frequencies of 5 to 90 mHz both with and without the presence of DC bias fields of up to 1 T. The transverse fields were applied both parallel and perpendicular to the face of the cable. For the cored cable IRC was relatively high, typically 70 μΩ at 1 T. On the other hand for the uncored cable at 1 T, IRC was more than an order of magnitude lower; also for the uncored cable IRC was found to decrease still further with decreasing bias field. Since the strand contained a Ta-protected Nb diffusion barrier it was deduced that the application of the bias field altered the way in which eddy currents flowed within the strand, in one case (0 T) via the Nb barrier and the Cu sheath, and in the other (1 T) via the A15 filaments, the bronze, and the sheath, which led to a higher IRC. It is concluded that AC loss in a Nb3Sn-strand Rutherford cable can be significantly moderated both by paying attention to strand design as well as through the insertion of a core.

Keywords

Contact Resistance Eddy Current Bias Field Coupling Loss Lawrence Berkeley Labaratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W.B. Sampson, M. Suenaga, and S. Kiss, “A Multifilamentary Nb,Sn Dipole Magnet”, IEEE Trans. Magn, MAG-13, 287–289 (1977).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    W.B. Sampson, S. Kiss, K.E. Robins, and A.D. McInturff, “Nb3Sn Dipole Magnets”, IEEE Trans. Magn. MAG-15, 117–118 (1979).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. McClusky, K.E. Robins, and W.B. Sampson, “A Nb3Sn High Field Dipole”, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 19931995 (1991).Google Scholar
  4. H.H.J. ten Kate, A. den Ouden, D. ter Avest, et al., “Development of an Experimental 10 T Nb3Sn Dipole Magnet for the CERN LHC”, IEEE Trans. Magn. 27, 1996–1999. (1991).Google Scholar
  5. R.M. Scanlan, W.A. Barletta, D. Dell’Orco, et al.,“Review of the Status of Superconducting Accelerator and Detector Magnets at Extremely High Fields”, Nucl. Insts. and Methods in Phys. Research A 380, 544–554 (1996).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J.M. Butler, C.A. Swenson, and W.J. Carr, Jr., “Progress in Understanding Ramp Rate Sensitivity in High Energy Booster Dipole Magnets”, in Supercollider5, ed. by P. Hale ( Plenum Press, NY, 1994 ) pp. 821–824.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.W.. Collings, M.D. Sumption, S.W. Kim, et al, “Suppression of Eddy Current Loss in Bare-Copper Rutherford Cables using Stainless Steel Cores of Various Thicknesses”, Proc. 16th Int. Conf. Cryo. Eng./Int. Cryo. Mats. Conf., ed. by T. Haruyama et al. ( Elsevier Science, Tokyo, 1997 ) pp. 1767–1770.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E.W. Collings, M.D. Sumption, S.W. Kim, et al.,“Suppression and Control of C oupling Currents in StabriteCoated Rutherford Cable with Cores of Various Materials and Thicknesses”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 962–966 (1997).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    M.D. Sumption, H.H.J. ten Kate, R.M. Scanlan, et al.,“Contact Resistance and Cable Loss Measurement of Coated Strands and Cables Wound from them”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 5, 692–696 (1995).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.W. Collings, M.D. Sumption, R.M. Scanlan, et al.,“Magnetic Studies of AC Loss in Pressurized Rutherford Cables with Coated Strands and Resistive Cores”, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 42, 1225–1232 (1996).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    M.D. Sumption, R.M. Scanlan, A. Nijhuis, et al., “Calorimetric Measurements of the Effect of Nickel and Stabrite Coatings and Resistive Cores on AC Loss in Accelerator Cables under Fixed Pressure”, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 42, 1303–1311 (1996).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M.D. Sumption, E.W. Collings, R.M. Scanlan, et al.,“Surface Conditions, Contact Resistance, and AC Loss in Rutherford-Type Cables with Various Coatings and Cores”, Cryogenics submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    E.W. Collings, Applied Superconductivity, Metallurgy, and Physics of Titanium Alloys, Vol. 2, ( Plenum Press, NY, 1986 ) pp. 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.B.J. Mulder and E.M.J. Niessen, “Coupling Losses of Multifilamentary Superconductors Having Several Concentric Regions and Mixed Matrix”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 3, 142–145 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    C.E. Bruzek, P. Sulten, P. Mocaer, et al. “Development of Superconducting Wires for Fusion Applications”, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 42, 1369–1376 (1996).Google Scholar
  16. A. Verweij, contribution to Proc. 32nd Workshop (June, 1996) on Superconducting Accelerator and Detector Magnets at Extremely High Fields“, co-authored by W. Barletta, E.W. Collings, L.D. Cooley, et al.,Nucl. Insts. and Methods in Phys. Research to be published.Google Scholar
  17. D.B. Smathers, M.B. Siddall, M.M. Steeves, et al.,“Manufacture and Evaluation of Tin Core Modified Jelly Roll Cables for the US-DPC Coil”, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 36, 131–137 (1990).Google Scholar
  18. B.J.P. Baudouy, K. Bartholomew, J. Miller, et al.,“AC Loss Measurement of the 45-T Hybrid/CIC Conductor”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 5, 688–691 (1995).Google Scholar
  19. A. den Ouden, S. Wessel, E. Kroopshoop, et al.,Application of Nb3Sn Superconductors in High-Field Accelerator Magnets“, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 733–738 (1997).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    A.D. Mclnturff, R.J. Benjegerdes, P.A. Bish, et al.,“Test Results for a High Field (13 T) Nb3Sn Dipole”, Proc. IEEE Particle Accelerator Conf., May 12–16, 1997 to be published; see also R.M. Scanlan, R.J. Benjegerdes, P.A. Bish, et al.,“Preliminary Test Results of a 13 Tesla Niobium Tin Dipole”, Proc. European Conf. on Applied Superconductivity, EUCAS-97 to be published.Google Scholar
  21. A.P. Verweij, A. den Ouden, B. Sachse, et al.,“The Effect of Transverse Pressure on the Inter-Strand Coupling Loss of Rutherford Type of Cables”, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 40, 521–527 (1994).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Kimura, “Electromagnetic Properties of Superconducting Compacted Strandeed Conductors”, Doctoral Dissertation,The Graduate University for Advanced Studies, 1–1 Oho, Tsukuba-shi, Ibaraki, JapanGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J.L. Duchateau, T. Schild, and D. Ciazynski, “Coupling Losses in Cables for Fusion Application: Influence of the Strand”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 967–970 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J.D. Adam, D. Leroy, L.R. Oberli, et al..“Rutherford Cables with Anisotropic Transverse Resistance”, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 7, 958–961 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Sumption
    • 1
  • E. W. Collings
    • 1
  • R. M. Scanlan
    • 2
  • A. Nijhuis
    • 3
  • H. H. J. ten Kate
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Materials Science and EngineeringThe Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratorySuperconducting Magnet GroupBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Applied Superconductivity CenterUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations