Techniques for Automatic Autogenous Welding of Low Sulfur 316LN Beam Tube

  • S. F. Kane
  • A. L. Farland
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 44)


Leaks and questionable penetration were found in some autogenous machine welded joints between the RHIC beam tube and flange located in the interconnect region. This investigation found the leaks were caused by hot cracking resulting from complications in welding low-sulfur, low-ferrite stainless steel. The marginal penetration is attributed to the joint design and the low sulfur content of the beam tube. Both problems are corrected using the same welding machine with specific electrode placement relative to the joint, and the addition of hydrogen to the shield gas. Repairs only should be accomplished with the addition of filler metal.


Filler Metal Stainless Steel Weld Heat Input Weld Ferrite Number AISI Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    L.P. Connor, Ed., “Welding Handbook: Volume 1, Welding Technology”, Eight Edition, (1987)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. E. Linnert, “Welding Metallurgy: Carbon and Alloy Steels, Vol. 1 Fundamentals”, Fourth Edition (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Burgardt and C.R. Heiple, Interaction Between Impurities and Welding Variables in Determining GTA Weld Shape, Welding Journal 65 (6), p. 150s (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J.L. Fihey and R. Simoneau, Weld Penetration Variation in GTA Welding of Some 304L Stainless Steels, American Welding Society Conference, Kansas City, Missouri, May 16–19 (1982)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Kujanpaa, N. Suutala, T. Takalo, and T. Moisio; Welding Research International, 9 (2): 55 (1979)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    T.A. Siewert, How to Predict Impact Energy from Stainless Steel Composition, WDF 51, p. 88 (1978)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    E.R. Szumachowski, H.F. Reid, Cryogenic Toughness of SMA Austenitic Stainless Steel Weld Metals: Part I — Role of Ferrite, Welding Journal 57 (11), p. 325s (1978)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D.T. Read, H.I. McHenry, P.A. Steinmeyer, R.D. Thomas, Metallurgical Factors Affecting the Toughness of 316L SMA Weldments at Cryogenic Temperatures, Welding Journal 59 (4), p. 104s (1980)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T.A. Siewert, Predicting the Toughness of SMA Austenitic Stainless Steel Welds at 77 K, Welding Journal 65 (3), p. 23 (1986)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Kane, “Fracture Toughness Requirements for RHIC Cryogenic Design”; RHIC Project Tech Note AD/RHIC/RD-40 (May 1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. F. Kane
    • 1
  • A. L. Farland
    • 1
  1. 1.Brookhaven National LaboratoryUptonUSA

Personalised recommendations