Advertisement

Analysis of Anomalous Resistivity in an Aluminium Stabilized Superconductor for the Large Helical Device

  • S. Imagawa
  • N. Yanagi
  • T. Mito
  • T. Satow
  • J. Yamamoto
  • O. Motojima
  • the LHD group
Part of the An International Cryogenic Materials Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 40)

Abstract

The helical coils of the Large Helical Device are pool-cooled superconducting coils. The conductor consists of Nb-Ti/Cu monoliths, pure aluminium stabilizer and a copper sheath. The copper sheath is necessary to sustain the large electromagnetic force created by approximately 100 MPa pressure. The aluminium stabilizer is selected to produce a high recovery current and high stability for thermal disturbances. In the short sample tests of the candidates for the conductor, anomalous magnetoresistivity of aluminium-copper composite conductor was observed, which is considered to be caused by Hall effect. We have been carrying out a program of improvement of the conductor to reduce the anomalous magnetoresistivity. A high resistive metal clad around the aluminium stabilizer is effective in reducing the Hall effect, but it spoils current-transition between superconducting wires and the stabilizer. Per the results of analysis for Hall effect and the current-transition, there should be optimum value for the resistance between the aluminium stabilizer and the clad that includes contact resistance. Since the contact resistance would be strongly related to the kind of material of the clad, there should be optimum material for the clad. By adapting Cu-2%Ni for the clad, we succeeded in reducing the Hall effect without spoiling current-transition fatally.

Keywords

Contact Resistance Hall Effect Contact Resistivity Hall Current Helical Coil 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Motojima, et al., Physics and engineering design studies on the Large Helical Device, Fusion Eng. Des., 20 (1993) 3–14.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Imagawa, H. Tamura, K. Yamazaki, T. Satow, J. Yamamoto, 0. Motojima and LHD design group, Design analysis of electromagnetic forces on the Large Helical Device, Fusion Eng. Des., 20 (1993) 67–72.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Mito, J. Yamamoto, K. Takahata, N. Yanagi, 0. Motojima and LHD Design Group, Development of superconducting conductors for Large Helical Device, IEEE Trans. Magn., 27 (1993) 2224–2227.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    T. Mito, K. Takahata, N. Yanagi, M. Sakamoto, A. Nishimura, J. Yamamoto and 0. Motojima, Short sample tests of aluminum-stabilized superconductors for Large Helical Device, Fusion Eng. Des., 20 (1993) 233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. W. Eckels, N. C. Iyer, A. T. Male, J. H. Parker, Jr. and J. W. Coltman, Magnetoresistance: the Hall effect in composite aluminium cryoconductor, Cryogenics, 29 (1989) 748–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Kaneko and N. Yanagi, Enhancement of magnetoresistance due to Hall current in aluminium–copper composite, Cryogenics, 32 (1992) 1114–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    N. Yanagi, T. Mito, K. Takahata, M. Sakamoto, A. Nishimura, S. Yamada, S. Imagawa, H. Kaneko, J. Yamamoto, and 0. Motojima, Experimental observation of anomalous magnetoresistivity in 10–20 kA class aluminum stabilized superconductors, this conference, CX-5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Imagawa
    • 1
  • N. Yanagi
    • 1
  • T. Mito
    • 1
  • T. Satow
    • 1
  • J. Yamamoto
    • 1
  • O. Motojima
    • 1
  • the LHD group
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Fusion ScienceNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations