Influence of Grain Structure and Solute Composition on the Work Hardening Behavior of Aluminum at Cryogenic Temperatures

  • David Chu
  • J. W. MorrisJr.
Part of the An International Cryogenic Materials Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 40)


An unrecrystallized structure is found to significantly improve the work hardening characteristics by lowering the work hardening rate during the early stages of deformation. This is in contrast to a recrystallized structure, which requires a higher work hardening rate to accommodate the greater degree of multiple slip necessary to maintain strain compatibility between the more randomly oriented grains. The stronger texture associated with the unrecrystallized structure allows deformation to occur more efficiently. The addition of magnesium also improves the work hardening characteristics by increasing the overall level of the work hardening rate. The improved characteristics of the work hardening behavior result in a parallel increase in both the strength and ductility at cryogenic temperatures. These findings are positive since they suggest a method by which improvements in the work hardening behavior and subsequent mechanical properties may be obtained through practical modifications of the microstructure and composition.


Yield Strength Fracture Toughness Flow Stress Cryogenic Temperature Plastic Stress 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J. Glazer, S.L. Verzasconi, E.N.C. Dalder, W. Yu, R.A. Emigh, R.O. Ritchie, and J.W. Morris, Jr.: Adv. Cryogenic Eng., vol. 32, 1986, pp. 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Glazer, S.L. Verzasconi, R.R. Sawtell, and J.W. Morris, Jr.: Metall. Trans. A, vol. 18, 1987, pp. 1695–1701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    C. Dorward: Scripta Metall., vol. 20, 1986, pp. 1379–1383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    K.T. Venkateswara Rao, W. Yu, and R.O. Ritchie: Metall. Trans. A, vol. 20, 1989, pp. 485–497.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. Chu and J.W. Morris, Jr.: Metall. Trans. A, vol. 21, 1990, pp. 1789–1799.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D. Chu and J.W. Morris, Jr.: in Light-Weight Alloys for Aerospace Applications II, E.W. Lee and N.J. Kim, eds., 1991, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Chu, C. Tseng, and J.W. Moms, Jr.: Adv. Cryo. Eng., vol. 38A, 1991, pp. 37–44.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.W.K. Honeycombe: in The Plastic Deformation for Metals, 2nd ed., Edward Arnold, London, England, 1984, p. 457.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    U.F. Kocks, A.S. Argon, and M.F. Ashby: Progress in Materials Science, vol. 19, B. Chalmers, J.W. Christian, and T.B. Massalski, eds., Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1975.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Mecking, B. Nicklas, N. Zarubova, and U.F. Kocks: Acta Metall., vol. 34, 1986, pp. 527–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    P.E. Johnson, J.H. Schmitt, S.A. Vincent, and J.W. Morris, Jr.: Scripta Metall., vol. 24, 1990, pp. 14471452.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. Mecking: in Work Hardening in Tension and Fatigue, A.W. Thompson, ed., TMS-AIME, New York, NY, 1975, pp. 67–88.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G.I. Taylor: J. Inst. Met., vol. 62, 1938, p. 307.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. Yao, D. Chu, and J.W. Morris, Jr.: in Light-Weight Alloys for Aerospace Applications II, E.W. Lee and N.J. Kim, eds., 1991, pp. 99–105.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    K. Jata and E.A. Starke, Jr.: Scripta Metall., 1988, pp. 1553–1556.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.H. Cottrell and R.J. Stokes: Proc. Roy. Soc. A, vol. 233, 1955, pp. 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    S.J. Harris, B. Noble, and K. Dinsdale: in 4th International Aluminum-Lithium Conference, G. Champier, B. Dubost, D. Miannay, and L. Sabetay, eds., Journal de Physique, vol. 48, colloque C3, 1987, pp. 521–526.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Chu
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. W. MorrisJr.
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Materials Science and Mineral EngineeringUniversity of California, BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations