Field and Length Dependence of the Creep Rate in Proximity Effected Multifilamentary Strands

  • M. D. Sumption
  • E. W. Collings
Part of the An International Cryogenic Materials Conference Publication book series (ACRE, volume 40)


Magnetization creep rates have been measured in proximity effected multifilamentary superconductive strands. Measurements have been made as a function of field for both untwisted strands of various lengths (L), and longer strands for several twist pitches (Lp). The results are described using a model which includes dual field gradients and a semi-Bean approximation. Three regimes are found; (1) low fields where the creep rate is similar to NbTi, (2) intermediate fields, where the creep rate is high due to proximity effect (PE), and (3) high fields, where the NbTi creep rate is recovered. U0 values for proximity effected strands are found to be between 5.3 and 10 meV. PE creep in twisted 71.1 cm strands (even where Lp/L ≪ 1) in which static PE at lower fields is controlled by Lp, is strongly influenced by end effects.


Creep Rate Proximity Effect Flux Creep Intermediate Field Magnetization Decay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    W.J. Can Jr., Effect of twist on wires made from in-situ superconductors, J. Appl. Phys. 54, 6549 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Harada, Y. Mawatari, O. Miura, et al,Excess magnetization due to interfilamentary proximity coupling in NbTi multifilamentary wires, Cryogenics 31, 183 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. D. Sumption and E. W. Collings, Effect of twist pitch, sample length, and field orientation on the proximity enhanced magnetization of fine filamentary multifilamentary strands, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 38, 783 (1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. D. Sumption, Proximity effect magnetization and energy loss in multifilamentary composites: influence of strand design and sample geometry, Ph.D. Thesis, Ohio University, 1992.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W.S. Gilbert, R.F. Althaus, P.J. Barale, et al,Magnetic field decay in model SSC dipoles, IEEE Trans. Magn. 25, 1459 (1989).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Bruck, D. Gall, G. Knies, et al,Time dependent field distortions from magnetization currents in the superconducting HERA magnets, Cryogenics 30, 606 (1990).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Stiening, SSC Lab Internal Report SSCL-359 (1991).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A.K. Ghosh, Youwen Xu, and M. Suenaga, Flux creep in multifilamentary conductors of NbTi and Nb3Sn, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 36, 27 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Yamafuji, Y. Mawatari, N. Harada, et al,Effect of flux creep on SSC dipole magnets, Cryogenics 30 (Suppl.), 615 (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. Matsumoto, A. Takagi, Y. Tanaka, et al,Magnetization decay effects in NbTi multifilamentary superconducting wires, IEEE Trans. MAG. 27, 2411 (1991).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    K. R. Marken Jr., M. D. Sumption, and E. W. Collings, Magnetization decay of SSC-type strands in various short test sample configurations, Adv. Cryo. Eng. (Materials) 38, 715 (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Yamafuji, N. Harada, Y. Mawatari, Creep rates of excess magnetization due to interfilamentary proximity couplings in superconducting NbTi multifilamentary wires, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 5, S117 (1992).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.D. Sumption, K.R. Marken, and E.W. Collings, Enhanced static magnetization and creep in fine-filamentary and SSC-prototype strands via helical cabling geometry enhanced proximity effects, IEEE Trans. Appl. Superconductivity 3, 751 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M.R. Beasley, R. Labusch, and W.W. Webb, Flux creep in Type-II superconductors, Phys. Rev. 181, 682 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y. Xu, M. Suenaga, A.R. Moodenbaugh, and D.O. Welsh, Magnetic field and temperature dependence of magnetic flux creep in c-axis oriented YBa2Cu307 powder, Phys. Rev. B 40, 10882 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    P.J. Kung, M.P. Maley, M.E. McHenry, J.O. Willis, and J.Y. Coulter, Magnetic hysteresis and flux creep of melt-powder-growth YBa2Cu307 superconductors, Phys. Rev. B, 46, 6427 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Sumption
    • 1
  • E. W. Collings
    • 1
  1. 1.Battelle Memorial InstituteColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations