Materials pp 55-59 | Cite as

Metastable Austenites in Cryogenic High Magnetic Field Environments

  • J. W. Chan
  • D. Chu
  • A. J. Sunwoo
  • J. W. MorrisJr.
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 38)


The fracture behavior of austenitic stainless steels of differing stability, AISI310S, 304, and 304L, in a 4.2 K, 8T magnetic field environment are examined. 304L specimens with different amounts of work at different rolling temperatures are also examined. The different rolling conditions are used to produce stability differences independent of those inherent to chemistry differences. The application of an 8T magnetic field at 4.2 K leads to measured fracture toughness above and below that without an applied field in the metastable alloys, with the amount and direction of change a function of the stability of the alloy. Stable 310S alloy does not exhibit significant fracture toughness changes. This difference in fracture behavior is attributed to the enhancement of martensitic transformation about the crack tip during the fracture process in a magnetic field.


Fracture Toughness Martensitic Transformation Austenitic Stainless Steel Applied Magnetic Field Free Energy Difference 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fultz, B. and J. W. Morris, Jr., Acta Metall., 34, no. 3: 379, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fultz, B., G. O. Fior, G. M. Chang, R. Kopa, and J. W. Morris, Jr., Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat., 32: 377, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fultz, B., G. M.Chang, R. Kopa, and J. W. Morris, Jr., Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat., 30: 253, 1983.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fukushima, E., S. Kobatake, M. Tanaka, and H. Ogiwara, Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat., 34: 367, 1988.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. W. Chan, J. Glazer, Z. Mei, J. W. Morris, Jr., Adv. Cry. Eng. Mat., 36: 1299, 1989.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fukushima, E., S. Kobatake, M. Tanaka, and H. Ogiwara, presented at the 1 l’ Conference on Magnet Technology, Tsukuba, Japan, Sept 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reed, R. P., Acta Metall., 10: 865, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reed, R. P., Martensitic Phase Transformations. Materials at Low Temperatures, R. P. Reed and A. F. Clark, eds., American Society for Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1983, pp. 295.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strife, J. R., M. J. Carr, and G. S. Ansell, Met. Trans. A, 8A: 1471, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Chan
    • 1
  • D. Chu
    • 1
  • A. J. Sunwoo
    • 1
  • J. W. MorrisJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Advanced Materials Lawrence Berkeley LaboratoryBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations