Materials pp 387-395 | Cite as

Fracture-Mechanical Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Plastics in the Crack-Opening-Mode (Mode I)

  • Elmar K. Tschegg
  • Karl Humer
  • Harald W. Weber
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 38)


In view of applications of fiber reinforced plastics at cryogenic temperatures, the mechanical properties of these materials have to be tested both at low temperatures and under various loading conditions (e.g. in tension, compression, shear and in particular in the crack opening mode). The main difficulty with a characterization of the crack growth (mode I) in glass-fiber reinforced materials lies in the fact that the crack length as well as the crack tip cannot be assessed with sufficient accuracy because of delamination and bridging of broken and unbroken fibers. Hence, linear elastic fracture-mechanics cannot be employed. In the present work, first attempts to characterize crack growth in mode I under quasi-static loading conditions in terms of fracture-mechanics have been made. Tests and evaluation procedures based on the fracture-energy-concept, which does not require the knowledge of the exact crack length, have been made at room temperature and at 77 K using a two dimensional glass-fiber reinforced epoxy (ISOVAL 10). Details of the technique as well as results of acoustic-emission investigations and of the influence of sample shape on the fracture-mechanical quantities will be presented. Advantages and disadvantages of the new technique will be discussed.


Cryogenic Temperature Linear Elastic Material Ligament Length Specific Fracture Energy Starter Notch 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    S. Hashemi, A. J. Kinloch and J. G. Williams, Mechanics and mechanisms of delamination in a poly(ether sulphone)-fibre composite, Comp. Sci. Tech. 37: 429–462 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. M. Newaz and J. Ahmad, A simple technique for measuring mode I de-lamination energy release rate in polymeric composites, Eng. Fract. Mech. 33:541–552 (1989).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. C. Garg, Intralaminar and interlaminar fracture in graphite/epoxy laminates, Eng. Fract. Mech. 23: 719–733 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. K. Sarkarand S. K. Maiti, Prediction of mode I fracture toughness of a laminated fibre composite from matrix fracture toughness of the basic layer, Eng. Fract. Mech. 38: 71–82 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Hillerborg, Analysis of a single crack, in Proc. “Fracture Mechanics of Concrete, Developments in Civil Engineering”, Ed. by F. Wittmann, Elsevier Amsterdam, 7:223-249 (1983).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. K. Tschegg, Strain softening behavior of fiber-reinforced materials, Mat. Sci. Eng. submitted (1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. Hillemeier, Bruchmechanische Untersuchungen des RiBfortschritts in zementgebundenen Werkstoffen; thesis, Universität Karlsruhe (1976).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. K. Tschegg, “Prüfeinrichtung zur Ermittlung von bruch- mechanischen Kennwerten sowie hiefür geeignete Prüfkörper”, Patent No. 390328, 1986, Patent application 31. 1. 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. K. Tschegg, New equipment for fracture tests on concrete, J. Mat. Struct. submitted (1990).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. N. Linsbauer and E. K. Tschegg, Determination of fracture energy of cementitious materials subjected to environmental influences, Final report Al, COST 502, No. HNL-01–89 (1989).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. K. Tschegg, K. Humer and H. W. Weber, Influence of test geometry on tensile strength of fibre reinforced plastics at cryogenic temperatures, Cryogenics 31: 312–318 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. K. Tschegg, K. Humer, H. W. Weber, to be published.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1992

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elmar K. Tschegg
    • 1
  • Karl Humer
    • 2
  • Harald W. Weber
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Angewandte und Technische PhysikTechnische UniversitätWienAustria
  2. 2.Atominstitut der österreichischen UniversitätenWienAustria

Personalised recommendations