Cable Magnetization Effects in the LHC Main Dipole Magnets

  • L. Bottura
  • M. Schneider
  • L. Walckiers
  • R. Wolf
Part of the Advances in Cryogenic Engineering book series (ACRE, volume 43)


Several short (1 m) and long (10 m) dipole models have been tested within the scope of the on-going R&D programme for LHC at CERN. We report here the results of measurements of field quality, focussing on the contribution of persistent current magnetization. We show that measurements of the dependence of allowed harmonics on magnetic field at 1.8 K can be computed with reasonable accuracy. The calculation is based on a model of the filament magnetization adjusted to fit available strand data. Low field measurements of the first allowed harmonics, sextupole and decapole, correlate satisfactorily with the filament diameter and the scaling obtained from the simulation program.


Large Hadron Collider1 Minimum Current Filament Diameter Penetration Phase Field Error 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    N. Siegel, Status of the Large Hadron Collider and magnet program, IEEE Trans. Appl. Sup., 7, 2, 252–257, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    D.A. Herrup, et al., Time varying sextupole corrections during the Tevatron ramps, Proc. of 13th Particle Accelerator Converence, Chicago IL, 518–520, 1989.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. Brueck, et al., Persistent current effects in the superconducting HERA magnets and correction coils, Proc. 2nd Eur. Part. Acc. Conf., 1990, 1160–1162.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Greene, et al., The magnet system of the relativistic heavy ion collider (RHIC), IEEE Trans. Mag., 32, 4, 2041–2046, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Y. Zhao, et al., Current dependence of harmonic field coefficients of 5-cm-aperture, 15-m-long SSC dipole magnet prototypes, IEEE Trans. Appl. Sup., 3, 1, 674–677, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K.H. Mess, P. Schmueser, R. Wolff, Superconducting accelerator magnets, World Scientific, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    R. Wolf, Persistent currents in LHC magnets, IEEE Trans. Mag., 28, 1, 374–377, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Bottura, L. Walckiers, R. Wolf, Field errors decay and “Snap-Back” in LHC model dipoles, IEEE Trans. Appl. Sup., 7, 2, 602–605, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Magnetization measurements on LHC strands performed by A. Wisniewki, R. Puzniak, Institute of Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw and H Fikis, Technische Universität Wien, Vienna.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. Bottura
    • 1
  • M. Schneider
    • 1
  • L. Walckiers
    • 1
  • R. Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations