Testing a Nonlinear Model of Sensory Adaptation with a Range of Step Input Functions

  • Andrew S. French
  • Susan K. Patrick


The mechanosensory neuron in the cockroach tactile spine has been used extensively as a model of sensory encoding. The neuron adapts rapidly to a sustained displacement and has a high-pass frequency response. Its dynamic behavior has been approximated by power functions of time or frequency. It also demonstrates several nonlinearities, including rectification and phase locking. Our previous work has shown that similar nonlinear dynamic behavior can be obtained from a reduced preChapaution, in which electric current is applied directly to the cell body of the neuron. Experiments with this preChapautions suggest that adaptation to a sustained stimulus is caused by an elevation in action potential threshold by two independent processes with different time constants. We have now tested the ability of this model to account for the response of the reduced preChapaution to step functions in current. The model was first fitted to individual step responses produced by different amplitude steps, and then to sets of varying step responses combined to form an input-output series. The results indicate that a model of this type, with two fixed time constants, can account for the dynamic behavior over a wide range of input amplitudes.


Step Response Frequency Response Function Sensory Adaptation Current Convertor Mechanosensory Neuron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Chapman, K.M. and Smith, R.S. (1963) A linear transfer function underlying impulse frequency modulation in a cockroach mechanoreceptor. Nature, 197:699–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dickinson, M.H. (1990) Linear and nonlinear encoding properties of an identified mechanoreceptor on the fly wing measured with mechanical noise stimuli. J. Exp. Biol., 151:219–244.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    French, A.S. (1984a) Action potential adaptation in the femoral tactile spine of the cockroach. Periplaneta americana, J. Comp. Physiol., 155:803–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    French, A.S. (1984b) The dynamic properties of the action potential encoder in an insect mechanosensory neuron. Biophys. J., 46:285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    French, A.S. (1984c) The receptor potential and adaptation in the cockroach tactile spine. J. Neuroscience, 4:2063–2068.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    French, A.S. (1986) Strength-duration properties of a rapidly adapting insect sensory neuron. J. Comp. Physiol., 159:757–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    French, A.S. (1987) Removal of rapid sensory adaptation from an insect mechanoreceptor neuron by oxidizing agents which affect sodium channel inactivation. J. Comp. Physiol., 161:275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    French, A.S. (1989) Two components of rapid sensory adaptation in a cockroach mechanoreceptor neuron. J. Neurophysiol., 62:768–777.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    French, A.S. (1992) Mechanotransduction. Annu. Rev. Physiol., 54:135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    French, A.S., Holden, A.V. and Stein, R.B. (1972) The estimation of the frequency response function of a mechanoreceptor. Kybernetik, 11:15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    French, A.S. and Korenberg, M.J. (1989) A nonlinear cascade model of action potential encoding in an insect sensory neuron. Biophys. J., 55:655–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    French, A.S. and Kuster, J.E. (1981) Sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor:extended bandwidth measurements and sensitivity to stimulus strength. Biol Cybern., 42:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    French, A.S. and Kuster, J.E. (1982) The effects of temperature on mechanotransduction in the cockroach tactile spine. J. Comp. Physiol., 147:251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    French, A.S. and Sanders, E.J. (1981) The mechanosensory apChapautus of the femoral tactile spine of the cockroach. Periplaneta americana, Cell Tiss. Res., 21953–68.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    French, A.S. and Wong, R.K.S. (1977) Nonlinear analysis of sensory transduction in an insect mechanoreceptor. Biol. Cybern., 26:231–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Looft, F.J. (1990) Linear systems analysis of cutaneous Type I mechanoreceptors. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 37:565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pringle, J.W. and Wilson, V.J. (1952) The response of a sense organ to a harmonic stimulus. J. Exp. Biol, 29:220–234.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Press, W.H., Hannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetteriing, W.T. (1990) Numerical Recipes in C, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ramirez, J.M. and French, A.S. (1990) Phentolamine selectively affects the fast sodium component of sensory adaptation in an insect mechanoreceptor. J. Neurobiol., 21:893–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spekreijse, H. (1969) Rectification in the goldfish retina: analysis by sinusoidal and auxiliary stimulation. Vision Res., 9:1461–1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stockbridge, L.L., Torkkeli, P., and French, A.S. (1991) Intracellular nonlinear frequency response measurements in the cockroach tactile spine neuron. Biol. Cybern., 65:181–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thorson, J. and Biedermann-Thorson, M. (1974) Distributed relaxation processes in sensory adaptation. Science, 183:161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew S. French
    • 1
  • Susan K. Patrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysiologyUniversity of AlbertaCanada

Personalised recommendations