Advertisement

Nonlinear Modeling of Physiological Systems Using Principal Dynamic Modes

  • Vasilis Z. Marmarelis

Abstract

The use of a small number of properly selected principal dynamic modes (PDM) may provide the long-sought parsimony and physiological interpretability of nonlinear models of physiological systems obtained from stimulus-response experimental data. The advocated approach makes use of a filter-bank comprised of the selected FDM’s that are feeding into a multi-input static nonlinear operator. This model form facilitates the system identification task and makes nonlinear modeling possible in certain cases previously thought intractable. Since the estimation of the PDM’s is based only on 1st-order and 2nd-order kernel measurements, and the estimation of the static nonlinearity can be practically extended to high-order systems, it is hoped that this modeling method will broaden the scope of Volterra-Wiener applications and facilitate the interpretation of the obtained results. This may promote the broader use of nonlinear models in studies of physical and physiological systems.

Keywords

Elliptic System Volterra Series Volterra Kernel System Kernel Laguerre Function 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barrett, J.F. (1963). The use of functionals in the analysis of nonlinear physical systems. J. Electron. Control, 15:567–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Korenberg, M.J. (1988). Identifying nonlinear difference equation and functional expansion representations: The fast orthogonal algorithm. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 16:123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, Y.W. and Schetzen, M. (1965). Measurement of the Wiener kernels of a nonlinear system by crosscorrelation. Int. J. Contr., 2:237–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marmarelis, P.Z. and Marmarelis, V.Z. (1978). Analysis of Physiological Systems: The White-noise Approach. Plenum, New York, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (ed.) (1987). Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. I, University of Southern California, Biomedical Simulations Resource, Los Angeles, California.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (ed.) (1989). Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. II, Plenum, New York, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (1977). A family of quasi-white random signals and its optimal use in biological system identification. Part I: Theory. Biol. Cyb., 27:49–56.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (1989). Signal transformation and coding in neural systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 36:15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. (1993). Identification of nonlinear biological systems using Laguerre expansions of kernels. Ann. Biom. Eng., 21:573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marmarelis, VZ., Chon, K.H., Chen, Y.M., Marsh, D.J. and Holstein-Rathlou, N.H. (1993). Nonlinear analysis of renal autoregulation under broadband forcing conditions. Ann. Biom. Eng., 21:591–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marmarelis, V.Z., Citron, M.C. and Vivo, C.P. (1986). Minimum-order Wiener modeling of spike output systems. Biol. Cybern., 54:115–123.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marmarelis, V.Z. and Orme, M.E. (1993). Modeling of neural systems by use of neuronal modes. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 40:1149–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ogura, H. (1985). Estimation of Wiener kernels of a nonlinear system and a fast algorithm using digital Laguerre filters. 15th NIBB Conf., pp. 14–62, Okazaki, Japan.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rugh, W.J. (1981). Nonlinear System Theory: The Volterra/Wiener Approach, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schetzen, M. (1980). The Volterra and Wiener Theories of Nonlinear Systems, Wiley, New York, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sutter, E.E. (1987). A practical nonstochastic approach to nonlinear time-domain analysis. In: Advanced Methods of Physiological System Modeling, Vol. I, University of Southern Califonia, Biomedical Simualtions Resource, Los Angeles, California, pp. 303–315.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Victor, J.D. (1979). Nonlinear systems analysis: Comparison of white noise and sum of sinusoids in a biological system. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 76:996–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Volterra, V. (1930). Theory of Functional and of Integral and Integro-differential Equations, Dover, New York, New York.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watanabe, A. and Stark, L. (1975). Kernel method for nonlinear analysis: Identification of a biological control system. Math. Biosc., 27:99–108.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wiener, N. (1958). Nonlinear Problems in Random Theory, Wiley, New York, New York.zbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vasilis Z. Marmarelis
    • 1
  1. 1.Departments of Biomedical and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Southern CaliforniaUSA

Personalised recommendations