From Single-Variable to Persons-in-Relation

  • David E. Hunt


It has been more than 25 years since the original work on The Achievement Motive (McClelland et al., 1953) appeared, and therefore I consider directions for future research in achievement motivation with special reference to earlier chapters. My comments will attempt to incorporate the methodological suggestions proposed by Walberg and Uguroglu and the proposal by Parsons and Goff to shift emphasis from an agentic to more communal perspective. My remarks are especially influenced by deCharms’ proposal to study persons-in-action rather than single variables, and the first section is a variation and extension of his theme. I next consider how conceptualizing a person informs methodological decisions, and finally, I propose the study of persons-in-relation as the appropriate phenomenon for psychological inquiry.


Community Psychology Achievement Motivation Communal Perspective Methodological Decision Comprehensive Conception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argyris, C. Some unintended consequences of rigorous research. Psychological Bulletin, 1968, 70, 185–197.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakan, D. The duality of human existence, Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.Google Scholar
  3. Cronbach, L. J., & Furby, R. How should we measure “change” or should we? Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. deCharms, R. Enliancing motivation: Change in the classroom, New York: Irvington, 1976.Google Scholar
  5. Entwisle, D. K. To dispel fantasies about fantasy-based measures of achievement motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harvey, O. J., Hunt, D. E., & Schroder, H. M. Conceptual systems and personality organization, New York: Wiley, 1961.Google Scholar
  7. Heider, F. The psychology of interpersonal relations, New York: Wiley, 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hovland, C. I. The generation of conditioned responses: I. The sensory generalization of conditioned responses with varying frequencies of tone. Journal of General Psychology, 1937, 17, 125–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hunt, D. E. Matching models in education: The coordination of teaching methods with student characteristics. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, 1971.Google Scholar
  10. Hunt, D. E. Theory-to-practice as persons-in-relation. Ontario Psychologist, 1977, 9, 52–62.Google Scholar
  11. Hunt, D. E. Conceptual Level theory and research as guides to educational practice. Interchange, 1978, 8, 78–90 (a).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunt, D. E. Theorists are persons, too: On preachng what you practice. In C. Parker (Ed.), Encouraging student development in college. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1978, 250–266. (b)Google Scholar
  13. Hunt, D. E. In-service training as persons-in-relation. Theory into Practice, 1978, 17, 239–244. (c)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hunt, D. E., & Sullivan, E. V. Between psychology and education. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden, 1974.Google Scholar
  15. Macmurray, J. The self as agent, London: Faber, 1957.Google Scholar
  16. Macmurray, J. Persons in relation, London: Faber, 1962.Google Scholar
  17. McClelland, D. C, Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A., & Lowell, E. L. The achievement motive, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Murray, H. A. Explorations in personality, New York: Oxford University Press, 1938.Google Scholar
  19. Ossorio, P. G. Never smile at a crocodile. Journal of Theory of Social Behaviour, 1973,5, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sampson, E. E. Psychology and the American ideal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1977, 35, 767–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarason, S. B. The psychological sense of community, San Francisco: Jossey Bass, 1974.Google Scholar
  22. Sarason, S. B. Community psychology, networks, and Mr. Everyman. American Psychologist, 1976, 31, 317–323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tolman, E. C. Prediction of vicarious trial and error by means of the schematic sowbug. Paper presented to American Psychological Association meeting, 1938. (Available in Tolman, E. C. Behavioral psychological man. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1958, pp. 190–206).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • David E. Hunt
    • 1
  1. 1.Ontario Institute for Studies in EducationCanada

Personalised recommendations