Fire Protection Systems

  • David R. Storm

Abstract

Every analysis of fire protection and prevention, whether it be a winery or fireworks factory, has two main objectives in common:
  1. 1.

    safety for the occupants of the building

     
  2. 2.

    protection for the building and contents from fire damage or total loss

     
Urban wineries have the same problems as wineries located at rural sites, but with the former, the solutions are considerably less complex and less costly. Only the rural winery setting will be discussed in this chapter, although the statutory requirements are the same for both rural and urban locations. The winery structure must be planned and detailed by the winery architect to meet Building Code and Uniform Fire Code requirements. The building designer cannot make a winery completely inflammable or fireproof, but he/she can, with judicious selection of construction materials and the control of draft and ventilation within the building envelope, reduce the risk of catastrophic fire and prevent its spread, should one occur. Multiple-option egress points should be detailed by the architect and approved by the local building official or fire protection agency representative.

Keywords

Fire Protection Fire Department Sprinkler System Local Fire National Fire Protection Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 151.
    Factory Mutual Engineering Corporation. 1967. Handbook of Industrial Loss Prevention. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
  2. 152.
    Factory Mutual Engineering Corporation 1994. Uniform Fire Code. Austin, TX: International Fire Code Institute, Vol. I, pp. 1–349–1–361.Google Scholar
  3. 153.
    Storm, D.R. 1990. Winery fire protection systems, Part II. Winery Water and Waste, Pract. Winery Vineyard 10 (6).Google Scholar
  4. 154.
    Storm, D.R. 1990. Winery fire protection systems, Part I. Wineiy Water and Waste. Pract. Winery Vineyard 10 (5).Google Scholar
  5. 155.
    Storm, D.R. 1993. Fire in the U.S. 1983–90. Washington, DC: National Fire Incidence Reporting System, Federal Emergency Management Agency.Google Scholar
  6. 156.
    Storm, D.R. 1995. Justice Department cracks down on ADA compliance. Consulting-Specifying Eng. April 1995. P.R.Google Scholar
  7. 157.
    Storm, D.R. 1980. Life Safety Code Handbook, 4th ed. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association.Google Scholar
  8. 158.
    Storm, D.R. 1994. Fire Resistance Design Manual. Washington, DC: Gypsum Association, Publ. GA-600–94.Google Scholar
  9. 159.
    Storm, D.R. 1995. Fire Protection Equipment Directory. Northbrook, Il: Underwriters Lab.Google Scholar
  10. 160.
    Storm, D.R. 1995. Factory Mutual Approved Fire Protection Equipment Directory. Norwood, MA: Factory Mutual Engineering Corp.Google Scholar
  11. 161.
    Jensen, R. 1975. Fire Protection for the Design Professional. Boston, MA: Cahners Books.Google Scholar
  12. 162.
    Jensen, R. 1988. Fire Protection Requirements for Occupancy Permit, Napa County, CA. Resol. of Board of Supervisors No. 88–98, August 8.Google Scholar
  13. 163.
    Foote, E. 1995. Personal communication California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, St. Helena, CA.Google Scholar
  14. 164.
    Foote, E. 1995. Personal communication. Stevens Water Monitoring Systems, A Division of Leupold & Stevens, Inc., Beaverton, OR.Google Scholar
  15. 165.
    Coon, J. 1991. Fire Protection Design Criteria, Options, Selection. Kingston, MA: R.S. Means Co.Google Scholar
  16. 166.
    Coon, J. 1991. Fairbanks-Morse Pump Division. 1991. Fire Pump Products Kansas City, KA: pp. 280–281.Google Scholar
  17. 167.
    Desrochers, M. 1993. Design parameters for fail-safe fire pump systems. Consulting-Specifying Eng. 13(6):42–46.Google Scholar
  18. 168.
    Desrochers, M. 1990. National Fire Protection Association Publication No. 20. National Fire Protection Association. Sec. 11–4.5, pp. 20–37.Google Scholar
  19. 169.
    Ingrassia, E. 1992. Fire alarm systems: Seven factors influencing selection. Consulting-Specifying Eng 12(1):60–62.Google Scholar
  20. 170.
    Dunn, J.E. and Fry, J.E. 1966. Fires Fought with Five or More Jets. Fire Research Technical Paper No. 16, London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  21. 171.
    Rutstein, R. 1979. Elimination of the fire hazard in different occupancies. The Fire Surveyor.Google Scholar
  22. 172.
    ThorJ. and Sedin, G. 1979. Fire Risk Evaluation and Cost Benefit of Fire Protective Measures in Industrial Buildings. Stockholm: Swedish Institute of Steel Construction.Google Scholar
  23. 173.
    Schwed, R.L. 1992. The marriage of fire alarm and building management systems. Engineered Syst.Google Scholar
  24. 174.
    Corsley, W.A. 1987. Protecting hazardous locations from fire disasters. Consulting-Specifying Eng.Google Scholar
  25. 175.
    MCGREAL, M. 1995. Changes to the 1994 edition of NFPA 13. Plumb. andMech. Eng.Google Scholar
  26. 176.
    Mcgreal, M. 1995. Piping materials for automatic sprinkler systems. Plumb. Mech. Eng Google Scholar
  27. 177.
    Bychowski, J.A. 1994. Automatic sprinklers: Simple, successful fire suppression devices. Consulting-Specifying Eng 16(5):71–80.Google Scholar
  28. 178.
    Wilcox, W.E. 1990. Early suppression, fast-response sprinklers reduce losses. Consulting-Specifying Eng. 48–49.Google Scholar
  29. 179.
    Moore, A.P. 1995. Choosing an alternative to Halon 1301. Plumb. Mech. Eng. 23–31.Google Scholar
  30. 180.
    Beck, P.E. 1990 Fire protection: Halons. Consulting-Specifying Eng. 43–45.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • David R. Storm
    • 1
  1. 1.Storm Engineering, Inc.USA

Personalised recommendations