External Control and Regional Development in an Integrated Europe

  • Brian Ashcroft
Part of the Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation book series (ESTI, volume 9)

Abstract

The process of European integration is generally perceived as an opening up to competition of both product and factor markets. Indeed, for many, the promotion of competition is the raison d’être of the European ideal. However, while competition and market integration are important dimensions of the integration process they do not completely define it. Alongside market integration there exists a process of company integration and functional specialisation which is having, and will continue to have, profound implications for economic development in Europe’s peripheral regions. This process is taking the form of cross-border takeovers, movements of company functions between locations, inward investments, management buy-outs and so on. The rationale for these changes may be to take advantage of increased market opportunities, but will just as likely be motivated by concerns to limit and restrict the effect of increased competition. Whatever the motivation behind such change, the outcome is likely to be further increases in the degree to which companies and economic activities in the peripheral regions are controlled by firms outside the region typically in the ‘core’ regions of the EU. This is because ‘core’ regions attract a disproportionate number of the headquarters of companies, a process which continues, largely through takeovers and re-organisations, within member states of the EU such as Germany [Schackmann-Fallis (1989)] and the UK [Ashcroft, Coppins, and Raeside (1994)]. Such trends would, I suspect, be found in other EU countries if the data were available. Further European integration is likely to accelerate and adjust this process in favour of the ‘core’ regions of the wider European economy.

Keywords

Regional Development Regional Economy External Control Firm Formation Supply Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AMIN, A. (1992), “Big firms versus the regions in the Single European Market” Ch. 6 in Dunford and Kafkalis (eds), Cities and Regions in the New Europe, Belhaven Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. ASHCROFT, B.; COPPINS. B.; RAESIDE, R. (1994), “The Regional Dimension of Takeover Activity in the UK”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 41, No. 2.Google Scholar
  3. ASHCROFT, B.; DUNLOP, S.; LOVE, J.H. (1993), Innovation in Scottish Manufacturing Finns, Scottish Foundation for Economic Research and Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  4. ASHCROFT, B.; LOVE, J.H. (1993), Takeovers, Mergers and the Regional Economy, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  5. ASHCROFT. B.; LOVE, J.H.; MALLOY, E. (1991), “New firm formation in the British Counties with special reference to Scotland”, Regional Studies, Vol. 25, pp 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ASHCROFT, B.; LOVE J.H.; SCOULLER, J. (1987), The Economic Effects of the Inward Acquisition of Scottish Manufacturing Companies 1965 to 1980, ESU Research Paper No 11, Industry Department for Scotland, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  7. FRITSCH, M. (1992), “Regional differences in new firm formation: evidence from West Germany”, Regional Studies, Vol. 26, pp 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. HOOD, N.; YOUNG, S. (1982), Multinationals in Retreat, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  9. JACQUEMIN, A. ET AL (1989), “Horizontal mergers and competition policy in the European Community”, European Economy No 40, (May), CEC Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. LOVE, J.H. (1990), “External takeover and regional linkage adjustment: the case of Scotch whisky”, Environment and Planning A, Vol. 22, pp 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LOVE, J.H. (1993), “EC mergers regulation, economic cohesion and the public interest”, Strathclyde Papen in Economics, 93/1, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow.Google Scholar
  12. MCNIE, W.M. (1983), “Employment performance of overseas-owned manufacturing units operating in Scotland 1954–77” Statistical Bulletin No A1. 1, Industry Department for Scotland, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  13. MARKUSEN, A. (1985), Profit Cycles, Oligopoly and Regional Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  14. PORTER, M. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  15. SCHACKMANN-FALLIS, K.P. (1989), “External control and regional development within the Federal Republic of Germany” International Regional Science Review, Vol. 12, No 3, pp 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. YOUNG, S.; PETERS, E.; HOOD, N. (1993), “Performance and employment change in overseas-owned manufacturing industry in Scotland 1980–90”, Scottish Economic Bulletin, No 7, pp 29–38.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brian Ashcroft
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraser of Allander InstituteUniversity of StrathclydeUK

Personalised recommendations